The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Thu May 15, 2025 4:45 pm

Board index » History and Reference » History & Technology

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post a reply
Username:
Subject:
Message body:
Enter your message here, it may contain no more than 60000 characters. 
Options:
BBCode is OFF
Smilies are OFF
Do not automatically parse URLs
Question
What is the name in the logo in the top left? (hint it's something dot com):
This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
   

Topic review - New Revelations in Attack on American Spy Ship
Author Message
Werner
  Post subject:   Reply with quote
Seasick wrote:
As for being a mistake, I guess the IDF should get glasses for their pilots.

I don't think the pilots made a mistake. I want to know (1) what the orders were from higher up in the IDF, and (2) what was the nature of the intelligence gathered and did The Johnson Administration at some level trade the intelligence, or raise with Israel the possibility of trading the intelligence to the Arabs as part of an effort to "de-escalate" the war.

Remember, this is the height of McNamara's influence in the Pentagon, a man with truly no moral compass.
Post Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 1:32 pm
Seasick
  Post subject:   Reply with quote
There has been considerable effort expended to try and hush this up.

As for being a mistake, I guess the IDF should get glasses for their pilots.
Post Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 1:27 pm
Werner
  Post subject:   Reply with quote
As I recall, during or just after the first attack Liberty hoisted a giant battle flag. After that point, how could you mistake the ship. Besides, she has the obvious C-3 layout and markings of the USN.
Post Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 11:53 am
Walt
  Post subject:   Reply with quote
Anonymous wrote:
It's always easy to Monday morning quaterback situations like these. The
Blackwater Agency is going through a similar scrutiny as we speak.
In the "fog of war" many things can go wrong. It does seem that the IDF did at sometime during the attack realize what they were shooting up. Why they continued is anyone's guess.. Maybe they thought they could sink it and forget it????Blame it on a mine... Who knows.
The only answer to these types of terrible blunders is to stop fighting wars .. something that is not about to happen anytime soon.
It was definitely not in Israel's interest to do this intentionally. And yes I believe that the US in the interest of stabilizing relations with Israel may have tryed to "soft shoe" this incident.. The proof is in how many Americans are aware of this incident...I'll wager it's not taught in American HS history or civics classes. Let Iran or the PRK pull off something like this and I am sure the US response would not be so .....mild.
Anyway the USS Liberty would be a interesting modelling subject.




Sorry this was my post I forgot to log in.... See mistakes do happen :thumbs_up_1: :thumbs_up_1:
Post Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 6:19 am
Guest
  Post subject:   Reply with quote
It's always easy to Monday morning quaterback situations like these. The
Blackwater Agency is going through a similar scrutiny as we speak.
In the "fog of war" many things can go wrong. It does seem that the IDF did at sometime during the attack realize what they were shooting up. Why they continued is anyone's guess.. Maybe they thought they could sink it and forget it????Blame it on a mine... Who knows.
The only answer to these types of terrible blunders is to stop fighting wars .. something that is not about to happen anytime soon.
It was definitely not in Israel's interest to do this intentionally. And yes I believe that the US in the interest of stabilizing relations with Israel may have tryed to "soft shoe" this incident.. The proof is in how many Americans are aware of this incident...I'll wager it's not taught in American HS history or civics classes. Let Iran or the PRK pull off something like this and I am sure the US response would not be so .....mild.
Anyway the USS Liberty would be a interesting modelling subject.
Post Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 6:14 am
JWintjes
  Post subject:   Reply with quote
I read Cristol's book - which interestingly is not only well researched, but also really well written - and discussed it with a couple of colleagues rather recently.

Some of them consider it to be the last word on it, but I actually doubt it - not because there is more to know, but because people are far too susceptible to conspiracy theories of one or the other nature.

Usually I make the experience that people tend not to accept "people sometimes simply make mistakes" as an explanation; always there have to be sinister ongoings behind it.

Jorit, celebrating national holiday :joker:
Post Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 6:14 am
Tiornu
  Post subject:  Re: New Revelations in Attack on American Spy Ship  Reply with quote
The premier expert on the incident maintains a web site:
http://www.libertyincident.com/index.html
Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:55 pm
Werner
  Post subject:   Reply with quote
A lot of this ground has been covered in Proceedings over the last 3-4 years. I think the mechanics of the events have been be established pretty well.

What remains open for me is why Israel attacked. I believe they knew they ordered an attack on an American ship at some point in the chain of command. The question is, why? Was The USA sending intelligence to the Arabs? What was their motive?
Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 10:25 pm
Tim Barron
  Post subject:  New Revelations in Attack on American Spy Ship  Reply with quote
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nati ... 1731.story
Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 10:04 pm

Board index » History and Reference » History & Technology

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group