Author |
Message |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: 1/350 USS Essex CV-9 1943, Pontos++ |
 |
|
Hows this one doing ?
Hows this one doing ?
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2014 11:53 am |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: 1/350 USS Essex CV-9 1943, Pontos++ |
 |
|
The thing about scratch building ship models is that by and large, most of the shapes are really simple. One just needs to sit back and figure out how to best break it down to get the shape and detail you want. Ain't no compound curves in that hangar bay!
The thing about scratch building ship models is that by and large, most of the shapes are really simple. One just needs to sit back and figure out how to best break it down to get the shape and detail you want. Ain't no compound curves in that hangar bay!
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 12:07 am |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: 1/350 USS Essex CV-9 1943, Pontos++ |
 |
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2014 8:26 pm |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: 1/350 USS Essex CV-9 1943, Pontos++ |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: 1/350 USS Essex CV-9 1943, Pontos++ |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: 1/350 USS Essex CV-9 1943, Pontos++ |
 |
|
Superb attention to detail!
Superb attention to detail!
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 9:46 am |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: 1/350 USS Essex CV-9 1943, Pontos++ |
 |
|
Impressive work!
Impressive work!
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 7:35 pm |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: 1/350 USS Essex CV-9 1943, Pontos++ |
 |
|
Taking your time looks like it works for you. Your detail is crisp and clean. Impressive.
Taking your time looks like it works for you. Your detail is crisp and clean. Impressive.
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 4:13 pm |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: 1/350 USS Essex CV-9 1943, Pontos++ |
 |
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 3:59 pm |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: 1/350 USS Essex CV-9 1943, Pontos++ |
 |
|
Plastic Habit wrote: Did Essex herself have the two mooring rings cut into the hull bulkheads below the port side 5" open singles at the forecastle deck? Like in the pic below from AOTS Intrepid. Alan Raven's drawings show none and I can't remember if there was a pic online that didn't show them. Help would be appreciated. There's a slightly better copy of this photo on page 328 of Warship International Vol XXXVI No 4, 1999 - it doesn't look like they're there to me.
[quote="Plastic Habit"]Did [i]Essex[/i] herself have the two mooring rings cut into the hull bulkheads below the port side 5" open singles at the forecastle deck? Like in the pic below from AOTS Intrepid. Alan Raven's drawings show none and I can't remember if there was a pic online that didn't show them. Help would be appreciated.[/quote]
There's a slightly better copy of [url=http://www.navsource.org/archives/02/020942e.jpg]this photo[/url] on page 328 of Warship International Vol XXXVI No 4, 1999 - it doesn't look like they're there to me.
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 10:44 pm |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: 1/350 USS Essex CV-9 1943, Pontos++ |
 |
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:15 pm |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: 1/350 USS Essex CV-9 1943, Pontos++ |
 |
|
Thank you for the reminder on the inset roller doors Tracy. If I'm not mistaken there are three on the port side, one for each set of roller doors aft of the side elevator. The inset roller door being the aft most of each set. The first inset has the mooring ring forward in the opening and the other two insets have the mooring ring set in the aft portion of the opening. Below is a buildup of one of my inset roller door openings.
I have one question that hopefully someone can answer or confirm. Did Essex herself have the two mooring rings cut into the hull bulkheads below the port side 5" open singles at the forecastle deck? Like in the pic below from AOTS Intrepid. Alan Raven's drawings show none and I can't remember if there was a pic online that didn't show them. Help would be appreciated.
Attachments: |
File comment: Here are eight layers of .01 sheet styrene glued up for the inset roller door openings.

SAM_2914.JPG [ 199.05 KiB | Viewed 3921 times ]
|

SAM_2915.JPG [ 197.55 KiB | Viewed 3921 times ]
|
Thank you for the reminder on the inset roller doors Tracy. If I'm not mistaken there are three on the port side, one for each set of roller doors aft of the side elevator. The inset roller door being the aft most of each set. The first inset has the mooring ring forward in the opening and the other two insets have the mooring ring set in the aft portion of the opening. Below is a buildup of one of my inset roller door openings.
I have one question that hopefully someone can answer or confirm. Did [i]Essex[/i] herself have the two mooring rings cut into the hull bulkheads below the port side 5" open singles at the forecastle deck? Like in the pic below from AOTS Intrepid. Alan Raven's drawings show none and I can't remember if there was a pic online that didn't show them. Help would be appreciated.
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 5:11 pm |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: 1/350 USS Essex CV-9 1943, Pontos++ |
 |
|
Looking good. Before you go too crazy on the roller doors, keep a look out for the one that was further inboard than the others. It's easy to spot on plans once you know what to look for - it's the set that has bits on the deck edge and closes inboard of that.
Looking good. Before you go too crazy on the roller doors, keep a look out for the one that was further inboard than the others. It's easy to spot on plans once you know what to look for - it's the set that has bits on the deck edge and closes inboard of that.
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 8:20 pm |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: 1/350 USS Essex CV-9 1943, Pontos++ |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: 1/350 USS Essex CV-9 1943, Pontos++ |
 |
|
I think you're doing this, but can't really tell from the photos: the portholes should be perfectly round, meaning perpendicular to the hull. The way Trumpeter did them is to make them parallel to the waterline, which is incorrect, and gives the oval shape.
I think you're doing this, but can't really tell from the photos: the portholes should be perfectly round, meaning perpendicular to the hull. The way Trumpeter did them is to make them parallel to the waterline, which is incorrect, and gives the oval shape.
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 9:16 am |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: 1/350 USS Essex CV-9 1943, Pontos++ |
 |
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:09 am |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: 1/350 USS Essex CV-9 1943, Pontos++ |
 |
|
Hey all,
Well, I haven't really gotten into the building phase yet as I am trying to work out how I'm going to do the detail. One thing I did find so far, which maybe of interest for those using the Pontos detail set, is that the bomb elevator at the base of the forward part of the bridge structure on the kit piece is not in the same location as the wooden flight deck. Also, the Pontos wooden deck does not have the location for the forward bomb elevator at the base of the #1 duel 5" turret.
Some of the PE items have been soldered together so they can be ready for when I need them. Started some detail work on the port side using WEM mesh and a shutter from AMW. I'm holding off on finishing the port side bulkheads so I can see how well my roller door prototype turns out. I've added some slats to one door, but will do the others before painting and see if they will look like individual slats in the end.
I had started drawing the hanger deck details right onto the hanger deck kit pieces but decided this would create a problem. I want to start gluing the deck pieces to the hull and get some painting underway which would have destroyed all the drawing I would have done. Now, by drawing the hanger deck detail onto some .02 sheet styrene I can refer back to it as I build the detail.
Attachments: |

SAM_2874.JPG [ 184.41 KiB | Viewed 4429 times ]
|

SAM_2879.JPG [ 147.18 KiB | Viewed 4429 times ]
|

SAM_2871.JPG [ 127.06 KiB | Viewed 4429 times ]
|

SAM_2877.JPG [ 150.91 KiB | Viewed 4429 times ]
|

SAM_2876.JPG [ 152.14 KiB | Viewed 4429 times ]
|
Hey all,
Well, I haven't really gotten into the building phase yet as I am trying to work out how I'm going to do the detail. One thing I did find so far, which maybe of interest for those using the Pontos detail set, is that the bomb elevator at the base of the forward part of the bridge structure on the kit piece is not in the same location as the wooden flight deck. Also, the Pontos wooden deck does not have the location for the forward bomb elevator at the base of the #1 duel 5" turret.
Some of the PE items have been soldered together so they can be ready for when I need them. Started some detail work on the port side using WEM mesh and a shutter from AMW. I'm holding off on finishing the port side bulkheads so I can see how well my roller door prototype turns out. I've added some slats to one door, but will do the others before painting and see if they will look like individual slats in the end.
I had started drawing the hanger deck details right onto the hanger deck kit pieces but decided this would create a problem. I want to start gluing the deck pieces to the hull and get some painting underway which would have destroyed all the drawing I would have done. Now, by drawing the hanger deck detail onto some .02 sheet styrene I can refer back to it as I build the detail.
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2014 3:09 pm |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: 1/350 USS Essex CV-9 1943, Pontos++ |
 |
|
Great idea making the hangar deck walls from scratch. The kit pieces just do not fit AT ALL, so you may as well go for the scale thickness.
Great idea making the hangar deck walls from scratch. The kit pieces just do not fit AT ALL, so you may as well go for the scale thickness.
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2014 1:59 pm |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: 1/350 USS Essex CV-9 1943, Pontos++ |
 |
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2014 1:30 pm |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: 1/350 USS Essex CV-9 1943, Pontos++ |
 |
|
Ditto.
I have Franklin on the short list. This should give me inspiration.
Ed-
Ditto.
I have [i]Franklin[/i] on the short list. This should give me inspiration.
Ed-
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2014 6:53 am |
|
|
 |