| Author |
Message |
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Kriegsmarine Scharnhorst & Gneisenau fans! |
 |
|
ModelMonkey wrote: What? Americans make spelling or grammatical mistakes? That's unpossible!  je am français ,cant spoke english  [quote="ModelMonkey"]What? Americans make spelling or grammatical mistakes? That's unpossible! :cool_2:[/quote]
je am français ,cant spoke english :lol_3:
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:43 am |
|
|
 |
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Kriegsmarine Scharnhorst & Gneisenau fans! |
|
|
ModelMonkey wrote: What? Americans make spelling or grammatical mistakes? That's unpossible!  So do Yurpians! me make big gramar and speling errurs! [quote="ModelMonkey"]What? Americans make spelling or grammatical mistakes? That's unpossible! :cool_2:[/quote] :rolf_3:
So do Yurpians! me make big gramar and speling errurs!
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2019 5:17 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Kriegsmarine Scharnhorst & Gneisenau fans! |
|
|
What? Americans make spelling or grammatical mistakes? That's unpossible! What? Americans make spelling or grammatical mistakes? That's unpossible! :cool_2:
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:51 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Kriegsmarine Scharnhorst & Gneisenau fans! |
|
|
ModelMonkey wrote: wefalck wrote: BTW, could the administrators please correct the title ? It should be 'Kriegsmarine' not 'Kreigsmarine' (I know it is the same pronounciation problem in English as with 'diesel-engine' - but it just looks awful). Thanks ... Done! Thanks, Steve! The title has been there for many years but I was afraid to mention it... I have been fighting the 'Marinefleiger' spelling for years but have given up trying to teach Americans the difference between 'ei' and 'ie' in German... [quote="ModelMonkey"][quote="wefalck"]BTW, could the administrators please correct the title ? It should be 'Kriegsmarine' not 'Kreigsmarine' (I know it is the same pronounciation problem in English as with 'diesel-engine' - but it just looks awful). Thanks ...[/quote]
Done![/quote]
Thanks, Steve! The title has been there for many years but I was afraid to mention it... I have been fighting the 'Marinefleiger' spelling for years but have given up trying to teach Americans the difference between 'ei' and 'ie' in German...
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 7:57 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Kriegsmarine Scharnhorst & Gneisenau fans! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2019 7:21 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Kriegsmarine Scharnhorst & Gneisenau fans! |
|
|
wefalck wrote: BTW, could the administrators please correct the title ? It should be 'Kriegsmarine' not 'Kreigsmarine' (I know it is the same pronounciation problem in English as with 'diesel-engine' - but it just looks awful). Thanks ... Done! [quote="wefalck"]BTW, could the administrators please correct the title ? It should be 'Kriegsmarine' not 'Kreigsmarine' (I know it is the same pronounciation problem in English as with 'diesel-engine' - but it just looks awful). Thanks ...[/quote]
Done!
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2019 6:16 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Kriegsmarine Scharnhorst & Gneisenau fans! |
|
|
|
BTW, could the administrators please correct the title ? It should be 'Kriegsmarine' not 'Kreigsmarine' (I know it is the same pronounciation problem in English as with 'diesel-engine' - but it just looks awful). Thanks ...
BTW, could the administrators please correct the title ? It should be 'Kriegsmarine' not 'Kreigsmarine' (I know it is the same pronounciation problem in English as with 'diesel-engine' - but it just looks awful). Thanks ...
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2019 4:49 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Kreigsmarine Scharnhorst & Gneisenau fans! |
|
|
|
Exactly, I was thinking about the new Flyhawk Scharnhorst 1943. I am not a big fan of releasing the same model at different time periods. I want a Scharnhorst April 1940 (Flyhawk might release one) but I know I will by the 1943. And it would suck if the differences are to big.
Exactly, I was thinking about the new Flyhawk Scharnhorst 1943. I am not a big fan of releasing the same model at different time periods. I want a Scharnhorst April 1940 (Flyhawk might release one) but I know I will by the 1943. And it would suck if the differences are to big.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2019 3:31 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Kreigsmarine Scharnhorst & Gneisenau fans! |
|
|
|
The questions likely refers to the new Flyhawk 1/700 kit of the 1943 version - and if that kit can be built as the ship was in April 1940.
The questions likely refers to the new Flyhawk 1/700 kit of the 1943 version - and if that kit can be built as the ship was in April 1940.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2019 11:26 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Kreigsmarine Scharnhorst & Gneisenau fans! |
|
|
|
If the question of 1940 and 1943 differences pertains to models, the Dragon kits of these two versions of Scharnhorst 1/350, captures all the differences except the catapult on turret C was gone by April 1940.
If the question of 1940 and 1943 differences pertains to models, the Dragon kits of these two versions of Scharnhorst 1/350, captures all the differences except the catapult on turret C was gone by April 1940.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2019 8:44 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Kreigsmarine Scharnhorst & Gneisenau fans! |
|
|
|
Say April 1940 and December 1943.
Say April 1940 and December 1943.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2019 12:07 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Kreigsmarine Scharnhorst & Gneisenau fans! |
|
|
|
what month(s) in 1940 & 1943?
what month(s) in 1940 & 1943?
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2019 9:27 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Kreigsmarine Scharnhorst & Gneisenau fans! |
|
|
|
What would be the difference between a Scharnhorst 1940 and 1943. More AA on the 1943 version. But were there any structural differences?
What would be the difference between a Scharnhorst 1940 and 1943. More AA on the 1943 version. But were there any structural differences?
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2019 9:09 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Kreigsmarine Scharnhorst & Gneisenau fans! |
|
|
|
These are early, never realized design studies. It is not the final design. Why should be there one for a sister ship?
These are early, never realized design studies. It is not the final design. Why should be there one for a sister ship?
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2019 10:46 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Kreigsmarine Scharnhorst & Gneisenau fans! |
|
|
|
welp,my question is : Is it possible to have Gneisenau conceptual drawing or not (I only found some about the scharnhorst )?
welp,my question is : Is it possible to have Gneisenau conceptual drawing or not (I only found some about the scharnhorst )?
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2019 9:56 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Kreigsmarine Scharnhorst & Gneisenau fans! |
|
|
|
Still, what is the question? Ersatz Hessen is the ship, which was named Gneisenau. It was never similar to the drawings, which you found. For sure, there were different design studies for Ersatz Elsass and Ersatz Hessen. The ships were built as Scharnhorst class. If they would be built as cruisers ("Panzerschiffe"), they would have been built as very similar sister ships. But they were never built in that way. Therefore, I do not understand your question.
Still, what is the question? Ersatz Hessen is the ship, which was named Gneisenau. It was never similar to the drawings, which you found. For sure, there were different design studies for Ersatz Elsass and Ersatz Hessen. The ships were built as Scharnhorst class. If they would be built as cruisers ("Panzerschiffe"), they would have been built as very similar sister ships. But they were never built in that way. Therefore, I do not understand your question.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2019 8:25 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Kreigsmarine Scharnhorst & Gneisenau fans! |
|
|
|
I was talking about ersatz Hessen,I've made a mistake sorry
I was talking about ersatz Hessen,I've made a mistake sorry
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2019 7:58 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Kreigsmarine Scharnhorst & Gneisenau fans! |
|
|
|
What is your question? The 2 turret version was never built. You can do what you want.
In reality, Ersatz Elsass and Ersatz Hessen were built as the battleships Scharnhorst and Gneisenau. Ersatz Hannover was Bismarck - obviously all different from the drawings shown above.
What is your question? The 2 turret version was never built. You can do what you want.
In reality, Ersatz Elsass and Ersatz Hessen were built as the battleships Scharnhorst and Gneisenau. Ersatz Hannover was Bismarck - obviously all different from the drawings shown above.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2019 7:44 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Kreigsmarine Scharnhorst & Gneisenau fans! |
|
|
|
was the panzerschiff 'Ersatz Hannover" suppose to be similar to the Ersatz Elsass or not? (I didn't find any concept drawing for the gneisenau too)
was the panzerschiff 'Ersatz Hannover" suppose to be similar to the Ersatz Elsass or not? (I didn't find any concept drawing for the gneisenau too)
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2019 2:27 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Calling all Kreigsmarine Scharnhorst & Gneisenau fans! |
|
|
was the Ersatz Hessen (Panzerschiffe D) similar in design to the Ersatz Elsass (Panzerschiffe E)?  Ersatz Elsass also got a 2 turret design  was the Ersatz Hessen (Panzerschiffe D) similar in design to the Ersatz Elsass (Panzerschiffe E)?
[img]https://wiki.gcdn.co/images/4/4c/Ersatz_elsass_blueprint.png[/img]
Ersatz Elsass also got a 2 turret design
[img]https://frm-wows-us.wgcdn.co/wows_forum_us/monthly_2018_08/Entwurf-3-b.jpg.3f119f0a4039aee4337bcd4d75140262.jpg[/img]
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 22, 2019 8:18 pm |
|
|
|
Login
Register
FAQ