The Ship Model Forum

[quote="DavidP"]maybe attachable rods to clean the bores of the 11" guns? a gun cleaning kit.[/quote]

I think the larger horizontally placed cylinders contain cleaning equipment for the 28cm main guns. These are visible in other photos also which makes sense.

WAG....they may be tubes to hold spare 20mm barrels for the extra AA fitted for the Dash?

maybe attachable rods to clean the bores of the 11" guns? a gun cleaning kit.

Has anyone any knowledge as to what are the vertical tubes or pieces as circled in red in the photo ([i]well screenshot from Youtube)[/i] of Scharnhorst's Anton and Bruno Turrets?

They only seem to be there for Operation Cerberus, The Channel Dash in 1942. They are not visible in photos from Operation Berlin in 1941 nor in photos from late 1942 or 1943 when Scharnhorst worked up in the Baltic and transferred to Norway.

Could they be tubes for spare barrels for the extra 20mm Flakvierlings that were embarked for Operation Cerberus? It is hard to find any clearer photo of them than the screenshot I have shown.

Im begining with a 1: 700 scharnhorts battleship proyect but I need some pics for take an idea.
anyone that have some color pics. thanks in advance.

[quote="ModelMonkey"]What? Americans make spelling or grammatical mistakes? That's unpossible! :cool_2:[/quote]
je am français ,cant spoke english :lol_3:

[quote="ModelMonkey"]What? Americans make spelling or grammatical mistakes? That's unpossible! :cool_2:[/quote] :rolf_3:

So do Yurpians! me make big gramar and speling errurs!

What? Americans make spelling or grammatical mistakes? That's unpossible! :cool_2:

[quote="ModelMonkey"][quote="wefalck"]BTW, could the administrators please correct the title ? It should be 'Kriegsmarine' not 'Kreigsmarine' (I know it is the same pronounciation problem in English as with 'diesel-engine' - but it just looks awful). Thanks ...[/quote]

Done![/quote]
Thanks, Steve! The title has been there for many years but I was afraid to mention it... I have been fighting the 'Marinefleiger' spelling for years but have given up trying to teach Americans the difference between 'ei' and 'ie' in German...

:thumbs_up_1:

[quote="wefalck"]BTW, could the administrators please correct the title ? It should be 'Kriegsmarine' not 'Kreigsmarine' (I know it is the same pronounciation problem in English as with 'diesel-engine' - but it just looks awful). Thanks ...[/quote]

Done!

BTW, could the administrators please correct the title ? It should be 'Kriegsmarine' not 'Kreigsmarine' (I know it is the same pronounciation problem in English as with 'diesel-engine' - but it just looks awful). Thanks ...

Exactly, I was thinking about the new Flyhawk Scharnhorst 1943. I am not a big fan of releasing the same model at different time periods. I want a Scharnhorst April 1940 (Flyhawk might release one) but I know I will by the 1943. And it would suck if the differences are to big.

The questions likely refers to the new Flyhawk 1/700 kit of the 1943 version - and if that kit can be built as the ship was in April 1940.

If the question of 1940 and 1943 differences pertains to models, the Dragon kits of these two versions of Scharnhorst 1/350, captures all the differences except the catapult on turret C was gone by April 1940.

Say April 1940 and December 1943.

what month(s) in 1940 & 1943?

What would be the difference between a Scharnhorst 1940 and 1943. More AA on the 1943 version. But were there any structural differences?

These are early, never realized design studies. It is not the final design. Why should be there one for a sister ship?

welp,my question is : Is it possible to have Gneisenau conceptual drawing or not (I only found some about the scharnhorst )?