The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 3:09 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post a reply
Post icon:
None
Username:
Subject:
Message body:
Enter your message here, it may contain no more than 60000 characters. 

Font size:
Font colour
Options:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are OFF
Disable BBCode
Do not automatically parse URLs
Question
type everything in between the quote marks: "N0$pam" Note the Zero:
This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
   

Topic review - Calling all Gato SS-212 class fans
Author Message
  Post subject:  Re: Calling all Gato SS-212 class fans  Reply with quote
Foundations for large guns were installed on both fore and aft decks. Several subs (e.g., Bluseback, Boarfish) were armed with both near the end of the war.


Attachments:
Blueback.jpg
Blueback.jpg [ 141.7 KiB | Viewed 3695 times ]
Boarfish.jpg
Boarfish.jpg [ 137.74 KiB | Viewed 3695 times ]
Post Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2021 4:48 pm
  Post subject:  Re: Calling all Gato SS-212 class fans  Reply with quote
Woodstock74 wrote:
Not 100% sure where to put this, as I'm not sure if the sub in question was a Gato, or a Balao, or what, but what was the most heavily armed USN Fleet Boat during WWII? I seem to recall one that was armed with a deck 5" both fore and aft? Or maybe it was a 40 mm and a 5", along with the usual 20 mm on the sail? I think I recall the sub captains experimenting in the field with alternate AAA/armament arrangements, though not certain what was feasible (I mean, how easily could an additional 5" deck gun have been installed, was there even the reinforcement in the deck for the mount?)? I also seem to recall options, fore/aft, as to where the single 5" could go? So clearly you could do that, should you be able to procure an extra 5"? Anyhow, contemplating an armed-to-the-teeth what-if with an extra Gato AFV Club kit I have laying around.

Ok, page 215 of Friedman's US Submarines Through 1945. Shots of Pargo and Aspro, both with 5" /25s fore and aft, a single 40mm forward of the bridge, and a twin 20mm on the cigarette deck.
Post Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2021 1:54 pm
  Post subject:  Re: Calling all Gato SS-212 class fans  Reply with quote
Thanks for this info, Tom.
Post Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2021 11:47 am
  Post subject:  Re: Calling all Gato SS-212 class fans  Reply with quote
Well, the correct answer for accuracy is:
E.) None of the above

But, the old Revell kit (lately and incorrectly boxed as Liofish, previously Flasher or Wahoo) is probably your best choice. It’s really a Gato class like Flasher, not a Balao class like Lionfish was. You can fill in the limber holes with a black marker or cut them out (a very tedious process). The guns provided are rudimentary and both propellers have the same blade angle twist, instead of opposite screws. If you want, you can cut the blades off the hub on one screw and reglue them on the hub with the opposite twist. The basic hull shape is not bad, either. With some care, it can be made into something decent, on par with the other kits you mentioned. Back when this kit was the “only game in town” for a fleet boat, Nautilus Models came out with more much accurate accessories for the Revell kit. Resin conning tower fairwaters and wood decks. These are still available on their website.

The Lindberg kit is considerably off on several details. The decking is oversized and it is more like a Balao sail than a Gato. At one point Lindberg even put a rocket launcher with a rocket that looked like one from the old Destination Moon film on their Nautilus kit, about to be rereleased by Atlantis. I think Lindberg kits in general are all in the “looks okay, close nuff” school of plastic kits.

The Kit by Atlantis looks decent, but there are no railings around the conning tower fairwater platforms. Looks odd to my eye. At least the Revell kit has plastic railings.

As you know, much better kits in terms of accuracy are on the market. But if this is more or less for nostalgia, go with Revell.
Post Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2021 6:32 pm
  Post subject:  Re: Calling all Gato SS-212 class fans  Reply with quote
Kit option question:

Of the "old school molds" of Gato/Balao class subs by Revell, Lindberg, Aurora-Atlantis, which one is preferred? Looking for a companion to my Aurora U-505 and I-19 kits. I suspect a new Trumpeter kit will look out of place.
Post Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2021 10:45 am
  Post subject:  Re: Calling all Gato SS-212 class fans  Reply with quote
Woodstock74 wrote:
Yeah definitely wasn't the Narwhal or one-off Argonaut, definitely was something more "standard" like Gato. Frankly, might have read about it in the Time Life "War Under the Pacific" as maybe it was one of the high scoring/really aggressive US sub commanders who retro-fitted his sub. So like the Tang or Barb? But I guess the base question is whether or not it's feasible in the first place, which I think it is, because at very least they could choose a fore or aft position for their singular mount, correct? So meaning there's the underdeck reinforcement for a gun in either position, thus you could feasibly mount 2 if you had them? Digging a bit more, seems Friedman discussed this topic in his book so I'll have to have a look when I'm home from work!

Yes, gun foundations were present in both positions.
Post Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 12:21 pm
  Post subject:  Re: Calling all Gato SS-212 class fans  Reply with quote
In 1945, USS Blenny SS-324, had 5/25 guns on fore and aft decks. One of the crew members provided me with a videotape from 16mm film of Blenny, using the guns on smaller targets. Not common, but such gunboats did exist.

I built a model from the old Revell Lionfish, which I heavily modified for the crew member, Frank Toon. Frank provided me with information, photos and the videotape. The model can be seen here:
http://www.modelshipgallery.com/gallery/ss/ss-324/178-td/Blenny-index.html

Here’s another couple of examples of gunboats, Cobbler and Blueback
http://navsource.org/archives/08/350/0834416.jpg
http://www.navsource.org/archives/08/0832608.jpg
Post Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 11:30 am
  Post subject:  Re: Calling all Gato SS-212 class fans  Reply with quote
Yeah definitely wasn't the Narwhal or one-off Argonaut, definitely was something more "standard" like Gato. Frankly, might have read about it in the Time Life "War Under the Pacific" as maybe it was one of the high scoring/really aggressive US sub commanders who retro-fitted his sub. So like the Tang or Barb? But I guess the base question is whether or not it's feasible in the first place, which I think it is, because at very least they could choose a fore or aft position for their singular mount, correct? So meaning there's the underdeck reinforcement for a gun in either position, thus you could feasibly mount 2 if you had them? Digging a bit more, seems Friedman discussed this topic in his book so I'll have to have a look when I'm home from work!
Post Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 10:50 am
  Post subject:  Re: Calling all Gato SS-212 class fans  Reply with quote
Timmy C wrote:
Maybe you're thinking of the older Argonautand Narwhal class, with two 6" guns?

I also remember reading about either Gatos or Balaos with 5"/25s fore and aft. They were referred to as gunboats.
Post Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2021 3:38 pm
  Post subject:  Re: Calling all Gato SS-212 class fans  Reply with quote
Maybe you're thinking of the older Argonaut and Narwhal class, with two 6" guns? They'd certainly be the most heavily-gunned US subs in the war.
Post Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2021 3:33 pm
  Post subject:  Re: Calling all Gato SS-212 class fans  Reply with quote
Not 100% sure where to put this, as I'm not sure if the sub in question was a Gato, or a Balao, or what, but what was the most heavily armed USN Fleet Boat during WWII? I seem to recall one that was armed with a deck 5" both fore and aft? Or maybe it was a 40 mm and a 5", along with the usual 20 mm on the sail? I think I recall the sub captains experimenting in the field with alternate AAA/armament arrangements, though not certain what was feasible (I mean, how easily could an additional 5" deck gun have been installed, was there even the reinforcement in the deck for the mount?)? I also seem to recall options, fore/aft, as to where the single 5" could go? So clearly you could do that, should you be able to procure an extra 5"? Anyhow, contemplating an armed-to-the-teeth what-if with an extra Gato AFV Club kit I have laying around.
Post Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2021 8:21 am
  Post subject:  Re: Calling all Gato SS-212 class fans  Reply with quote
Max,

You might be able to find some good information on the Pampanito drawing repository:

https://maritime.org/tech/drawings/

These two drawings show the exhaust system and the lists of pipes:

https://maritime.org/tech/drawings/engine-exhaust-arrangement_ss386-s4105a-67864alt1_5400-11-0168.jpg
https://maritime.org/tech/drawings/engine-exhaust-main-aux_ss381-s4105-67810_5400-09-0139.jpg

It looks like the exhaust pipes that come out of the mufflers (e.g. pipes C-25 and C-49) have an outer diameter of 16-3/8".

Jacob
Post Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2021 8:32 pm
  Post subject:  Re: Calling all Gato SS-212 class fans  Reply with quote
The exact size? No. I searched through the manuals I have and could find no definitive number for the exhaust diameter.

But, you can probably derive a reasonable estimate from these photos. My guesstimate is 12-14 inches.


Attachments:
File comment: Diesel exhaust ports
Lionfish.jpg
Lionfish.jpg [ 97.59 KiB | Viewed 5701 times ]
Exhaust-2.jpg
Exhaust-2.jpg [ 151.19 KiB | Viewed 5701 times ]
Post Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2021 3:52 pm
  Post subject:  Gato/ Balao Exhaust Ports  Reply with quote
Would anyone know what the size of the exhaust ports were in diameter?
Thanks in advance.
Post Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2021 4:16 am
  Post subject:  Re: Calling all Gato SS-212 class fans  Reply with quote
I'd be interested in finding any articles or other online resources about the "art" of doctored naval photos. So far my searches have just turned up the general subject of military censorship during WW2 and what was allowed to be reported.
Post Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2020 4:20 pm
  Post subject:  Re: Calling all Gato SS-212 class fans  Reply with quote
Interesting, it's surprising that they would airbrush the forward gun out.
Post Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2020 10:36 am
  Post subject:  Re: Calling all Gato SS-212 class fans  Reply with quote
If it was a 2A, wouldn't there appear to be less space between the gun and the fairwater from that angle? Similar to this:
http://navsource.org/archives/08/183/0825916.jpg

The amount of space between the two in the "Rock" photo is one of the things that made me think it had been altered. I believe I originally saw the photo--or one very much like it--in HT Lenton's "American Submarines." Don't have the book handy, but I do recall the photo leading me to chop the forward AA platform off a sub model I was working on at the time....

Edit: Just found this pic, labeled as USS Hake, on uboat.net which also seems to me to have the forward AA position edited out:

Image
Post Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2020 7:23 pm
  Post subject:  Re: Calling all Gato SS-212 class fans  Reply with quote
ArmchairAdmiral wrote:
Doing a little photographic detective work and looking for confirmation of my conclusion. This is a photograph from HyperWar labeled as the USS Rock, SS-274.
Image

The picture indicates no AA armament platform at the front of the fairwater. NavSource has several other pics that show such a platform on Rock, including that she was launched with one in place. So that rules out this being Rock with a Mod 2A fairwater, which I think was discontinued before she entered service.

I have seen some photos taken at such an angle that it makes the forward AA platform almost disappear, but not quite this cleanly. Therefore, my conclusion is that this is a picture of Rock that has had the forward AA platform censored, for whatever reason.


It seems much more likely to me that this is a boat with the "Mod 2A" fairwater that was mislabeled as the Rock. Mislabeling photos isn't unheard of. For example, this photo is often said to be the Barb:

Image

Wikipedia says she's the Barb, and there are photos signed by Eugene Fluckey himself:

Image

But if you look at the limber hole pattern, she is clearly not the [img]Barb[/img].
Post Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2020 1:22 pm
  Post subject:  Re: Calling all Gato SS-212 class fans  Reply with quote
ArmchairAdmiral wrote:
Doing a little photographic detective work and looking for confirmation of my conclusion. This is a photograph from HyperWar labeled as the USS Rock, SS-274.
Image

The picture indicates no AA armament platform at the front of the fairwater. NavSource has several other pics that show such a platform on Rock, including that she was launched with one in place. So that rules out this being Rock with a Mod 2A fairwater, which I think was discontinued before she entered service.

I have seen some photos taken at such an angle that it makes the forward AA platform almost disappear, but not quite this cleanly. Therefore, my conclusion is that this is a picture of Rock that has had the forward AA platform censored, for whatever reason.


How sure are you that this photo is indeed of ROCK? As you note, the fairwater is intact (forward) on the photo -- all the photos I can find of ROCK show the forward platform cut down and prepped for 20mm installation. I personally have never seen evidence of censors retouching submarine fairwaters (though I'm sure it's possible).
Post Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2020 11:09 am
  Post subject:  Re: Calling all Gato SS-212 class fans  Reply with quote
Doing a little photographic detective work and looking for confirmation of my conclusion. This is a photograph from HyperWar labeled as the USS Rock, SS-274.
Image

The picture indicates no AA armament platform at the front of the fairwater. NavSource has several other pics that show such a platform on Rock, including that she was launched with one in place. So that rules out this being Rock with a Mod 2A fairwater, which I think was discontinued before she entered service.

I have seen some photos taken at such an angle that it makes the forward AA platform almost disappear, but not quite this cleanly. Therefore, my conclusion is that this is a picture of Rock that has had the forward AA platform censored, for whatever reason.
Post Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2020 8:20 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group