Author |
Message |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: USS Bunker Hill CG-52 Dragon 1/350 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2019 3:31 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: USS Bunker Hill CG-52 Dragon 1/350 |
|
|
Looking good LucasB!! I'm currently doing a 1/700 USS Mobile Bay and saw your post on this build. I like how you detailed the helo-hangar. Pretty sweet! Looking forward to your progress photos.
Looking good LucasB!! I'm currently doing a 1/700 USS Mobile Bay and saw your post on this build. I like how you detailed the helo-hangar. Pretty sweet! Looking forward to your progress photos.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 3:04 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: USS Bunker Hill CG-52 Dragon 1/350 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2019 3:27 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: USS Bunker Hill CG-52 Dragon 1/350 |
|
|
Timothyo wrote: Pulling up a chair to watch this build! I have heard that this is a bad fitting kit, how are things fitting for you? Looks like an excellent start- I like the hanger!
Regards, Timothy The model is already older production date.The base is not bad,you have to adapt enough,add details.Superstructures do not fit together. But there is no other model of this beautiful ship.
[quote="Timothyo"]Pulling up a chair to watch this build! I have heard that this is a bad fitting kit, how are things fitting for you? Looks like an excellent start- I like the hanger!
Regards, Timothy[/quote]
The model is already older production date.The base is not bad,you have to adapt enough,add details.Superstructures do not fit together. But there is no other model of this beautiful ship.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2019 12:15 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: USS Bunker Hill CG-52 Dragon 1/350 |
|
|
navydave1989 wrote: While it's plausible that various types of helicopters landed aboard during the Desert Shield/Storm timeframe, the embarked helos would have been SH-60Bs, assigned to Light Helicopter Anti-submarine Squadron 47 (HSL-47). https://nara.getarchive.net/media/an-sh ... ine-f1ff32Thank you for the report, it did not please me, but at least I'm clear.
[quote="navydave1989"]While it's plausible that various types of helicopters landed aboard during the Desert Shield/Storm timeframe, the embarked helos would have been SH-60Bs, assigned to Light Helicopter Anti-submarine Squadron 47 (HSL-47). https://nara.getarchive.net/media/an-sh-60b-sea-hawk-helicopter-from-detachment-7-light-helicopter-anti-submarine-f1ff32[/quote]
Thank you for the report, it did not please me, but at least I'm clear.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2019 12:12 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: USS Bunker Hill CG-52 Dragon 1/350 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2019 12:10 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: USS Bunker Hill CG-52 Dragon 1/350 |
|
|
While it's plausible that various types of helicopters landed aboard during the Desert Shield/Storm timeframe, the embarked helos would have been SH-60Bs, assigned to Light Helicopter Anti-submarine Squadron 47 (HSL-47). https://nara.getarchive.net/media/an-sh ... ine-f1ff32
While it's plausible that various types of helicopters landed aboard during the Desert Shield/Storm timeframe, the embarked helos would have been SH-60Bs, assigned to Light Helicopter Anti-submarine Squadron 47 (HSL-47). https://nara.getarchive.net/media/an-sh-60b-sea-hawk-helicopter-from-detachment-7-light-helicopter-anti-submarine-f1ff32
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2019 10:39 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: USS Bunker Hill CG-52 Dragon 1/350 |
|
|
Pulling up a chair to watch this build! I have heard that this is a bad fitting kit, how are things fitting for you? Looks like an excellent start- I like the hanger!
Regards, Timothy
Pulling up a chair to watch this build! I have heard that this is a bad fitting kit, how are things fitting for you? Looks like an excellent start- I like the hanger!
Regards, Timothy
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2019 10:31 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: USS Bunker Hill CG-52 Dragon 1/350 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2019 3:11 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
USS Bunker Hill CG-52 Dragon 1/350 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2019 3:10 pm |
|
|
|