Author |
Message |
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Respond to smear campaign |
|
|
Yes I had intended to mention that, but forgot while grabbing the appropriate links, etc. If you try and claim it as yours, it's not fair use. But, if you state where it's from, it is.
Yes :doh_1: I had intended to mention that, but forgot while grabbing the appropriate links, etc. If you try and claim it as yours, it's not fair use. But, if you state where it's from, it is.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 12:18 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Respond to smear campaign |
|
|
Tracy, I don't want to start a huge argument or anything I'd simply like a clarification. The quoted passage all sounds well and good but isn't/shouldn't there be an additional sentence that states all of that is only allowed IF the source is credited?? We were always taught in school and college growing up that if we used material from another source and included it in our papers and did NOT credit them then we were plagiarizing, IE passing off someone else's work as our own. Isn't that what's going on here? Again, I just want a clarification, no heated arguments
Tracy, I don't want to start a huge argument or anything I'd simply like a clarification. The quoted passage all sounds well and good but isn't/shouldn't there be an additional sentence that states all of that is only allowed IF the source is credited?? We were always taught in school and college growing up that if we used material from another source and included it in our papers and did NOT credit them then we were plagiarizing, IE passing off someone else's work as our own. Isn't that what's going on here? Again, I just want a clarification, no heated arguments :wave_1:
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:11 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Respond to smear campaign |
|
|
Before John tries to have this single page of his book pulled, I wanted to bring up fair use in the American copyright system and why you should not even try. We have exceptions to the exclusivity provided by copyright - one such is known as "fair use." Fair use is described in Section 107 of the Copyright Law of the United States of America. Here's the relevant passage (Emphasis mine): Quote: Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. You gots a problem wit' dat, it's your problem. </brooklyn>
Before John tries to have this single page of his book pulled, I wanted to bring up fair use in the American copyright system and why you should not even try.
We have exceptions to the exclusivity provided by copyright - one such is known as "fair use." Fair use is described in [url=http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#107]Section 107[/url] of the [url=http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html]Copyright Law of the United States of America[/url]. Here's the relevant passage (Emphasis mine):
[quote]Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the [b]fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction[/b] in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, [b]for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching [/b](including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, [b]is not an infringement of copyright.[/b] [/quote]
You gots a problem wit' dat, it's your problem. </brooklyn>
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 1:16 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Respond to smear campaign |
|
|
I hope the Administrators/Moderators don't mind if I rescue this thread from the abyss, but I don't want to start a new one, and I can't think of a better place to put this. Well, the thing is that the same person who was so desperately demanding the removal of a warship profile here last year, has just recently published a new book on the battleship Bismarck. The following scan taken directly from this book is the latest copycat example from a guy who claims to have been researching the subject for more than 30 years. If you have a minute, please take a quick look at Otto von Bismarck biography and then compare it with the page located on my own website that I wrote myself more than 10 years ago right here: http://www.kbismarck.com/otto-von-bismarck.htmlThe evidence speaks for itself. EDIT: Photo scan taken from the book "Bismarck. Pride of the German Navy" By John Asmussen
I hope the Administrators/Moderators don't mind if I rescue this thread from the abyss, but I don't want to start a new one, and I can't think of a better place to put this.
Well, the thing is that the same person who was so desperately demanding the removal of a warship profile here last year, has just recently published a new book on the battleship Bismarck. The following scan taken directly from this book is the latest copycat example from a guy who claims to have been researching the subject for more than 30 years. If you have a minute, please take a quick look at Otto von Bismarck biography and then compare it with the page located on my own website that I wrote myself more than 10 years ago right here: http://www.kbismarck.com/otto-von-bismarck.html
The evidence speaks for itself.
[img]http://www.kbismarck.com/copy001.jpg[/img]
[color=red]EDIT: Photo scan taken from the book "Bismarck. Pride of the German Navy" By John Asmussen[/color]
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 1:01 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Respond to smear campaign |
|
|
I also tried to help by pointing out the weak points in his argument so that he could shore them up. I wanted to help because I am too an artist and the darn thieves are all of our problems.
Why don't you read through the thread before automatically labeling ALL of us as being against someone. I certainly don't appreciate false accusations and neither do the rest of us. We're all familiar with the age old saying about assuming...
I also tried to help by pointing out the weak points in his argument so that he could shore them up. I wanted to help because I am too an artist and the darn thieves are all of our problems.
Why don't you read through the thread before automatically labeling ALL of us as being against someone. I certainly don't appreciate false accusations and neither do the rest of us. We're all familiar with the age old saying about assuming...
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 4:10 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Respond to smear campaign |
|
|
Excuse me Jim; I tried to help him a couple of times and was either ignored or insulted. It is lunacy at that point to try and continue to help someone. John has poisoned his experience here from the start with his attitude and treatment of others.
Excuse me Jim; I tried to help him a couple of times and was either ignored or insulted. It is lunacy at that point to try and continue to help someone. John has poisoned his experience here from the start with his attitude and treatment of others.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 1:05 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Respond to smear campaign |
|
|
its jim wrote: last post Jimmmy, if one is to sum up your most useful post under a bottom line, than this is it. Happy whatever ~ Olaf!
[quote="its jim"]last post[/quote]
:woo_hoo:
Jimmmy, if one is to sum up your most useful post under a bottom line, than this is it.
Happy whatever ~ Olaf!
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:04 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Respond to smear campaign |
|
|
its shameful the way you have all sided against john. thats it last post
its shameful the way you have all sided against john. thats it last post
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:17 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Respond to smear campaign |
|
|
C'mon John. If he stole your drawing a decade ago, fine. This Robocop approach isn't getting the drawings removed from this website and makes an open discussion most difficult.
C'mon John. If he stole your drawing a decade ago, fine. This Robocop approach isn't getting the drawings removed from this website and makes an open discussion most difficult.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 3:04 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Respond to smear campaign |
|
|
Nope. Tried to give him the benefit of the doubt... I'd been told by others for a while that they had negative opinions of him, but I like to form my own opinions. Consider it forged.
Nope. Tried to give him the benefit of the doubt... I'd been told by others for a while that they had negative opinions of him, but I like to form my own opinions. Consider it forged. :big_grin:
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 3:03 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Respond to smear campaign |
|
|
Tracy White wrote: If you're addressing the owner ONLY you put it in a PM or e-mail. You address him publicly like this you are trying to prove you're the bigger man and boost your ego. You missed an S in your last name; there should be two after the A. His 'winning the hearts and minds' campaign isn't doing so well, I gather....
[quote="Tracy White"]If you're addressing the owner ONLY you put it in a PM or e-mail. You address him publicly like this you are trying to prove you're the bigger man and boost your ego. You missed an S in your last name; there should be two after the A.[/quote]
His 'winning the hearts and minds' campaign isn't doing so well, I gather.... :heh:
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 2:57 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Respond to smear campaign |
|
|
If you're addressing the owner ONLY you put it in a PM or e-mail. You address him publicly like this you are trying to prove you're the bigger man and boost your ego. You missed an S in your last name; there should be two after the A.
If you're addressing the owner ONLY you put it in a PM or e-mail. You address him publicly like this you are trying to prove you're the bigger man and boost your ego. You missed an S in your last name; there should be two after the A.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 2:11 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Respond to smear campaign |
|
|
I don't care what you say and think.
I was addressing the owner so mind you own business.
I don't care what you say and think.
I was addressing the owner so mind you own business.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 2:02 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Respond to smear campaign |
|
|
I reiterate that posting parts of images for discussion is also covered and allowed under US copyright as part of the Fair Use clause WHEN PROPERLY ATTRIBUTED. You can demand removal all you want, but if it's properly attributed and follows the fair use guidelines I posted in the Bismarck thread you have nothing but hot air and bluster.
I reiterate that posting parts of images for discussion is also covered and allowed under US copyright as part of the Fair Use clause WHEN PROPERLY ATTRIBUTED. You can demand removal all you want, but if it's properly attributed and follows the fair use guidelines I posted in the Bismarck thread you have nothing but hot air and bluster.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:54 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Respond to smear campaign |
|
|
Cadman,
I again demand that you remove my drawings and remove any links to my website. You have no permission to show this in your forum.
John
Cadman,
I again demand that you remove my drawings and remove any links to my website. You have no permission to show this in your forum.
John
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:04 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Respond to smear campaign |
|
|
Rico,
I think you should stop your lies and stop using your forum to attack me as you have done in over a decade now.
John
Rico,
I think you should stop your lies and stop using your forum to attack me as you have done in over a decade now.
John
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 11:49 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Respond to smear campaign |
|
|
Cadman wrote: You should give proper credit to Mr. López. I don't think that would be necessary anymore Timothy, since he has just now changed the drawing in question on his website to a new one. The drawing that now appears in the following link is not the same that appeared only a couple of hours ago (see image attached on my previous post above) http://www.bismarck-class.dk/bismarck/p ... elarge.gifHopefully the new creation is of his own and not taken from someone else.
[quote="Cadman"]You should give proper credit to Mr. López.[/quote] I don't think that would be necessary anymore Timothy, since he has just now changed the drawing in question on his website to a new one. The drawing that now appears in the following link is not the same that appeared only a couple of hours ago (see image attached on my previous post above) :cool_2:
http://www.bismarck-class.dk/bismarck/paint_schemes/pictures/1940/paintbism19401sidelarge.gif
Hopefully the new creation is of his own and not taken from someone else.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 11:35 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Respond to smear campaign |
|
|
... and the Scharnhorst I have released on 2004 with Andrea Toller as drawing maker ... were even a wrong intermediate drawing ( wrong !!! ) has been copied ...
... and the Scharnhorst I have released on 2004 with Andrea Toller as drawing maker ... were even a wrong intermediate drawing ( wrong !!! ) has been copied ...
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 11:35 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Respond to smear campaign |
|
|
... than the Admiral Hipper I released on 2007 with Abram Joslin as my drawing maker ...
... than the Admiral Hipper I released on 2007 with Abram Joslin as my drawing maker ...
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 11:33 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
Re: Respond to smear campaign |
|
|
Hello everybody, @ Cadman, I agree with you Timothy. Manuel surely deserves his credits And he is NOT the only one which deserves his credits and recognitions ... and more to come on this one soon ... Bye Antonio
Hello everybody,
@ Cadman,
I agree with you Timothy.
Manuel surely deserves his credits :thumbs_up_1:
And he is NOT the only one which deserves his credits and recognitions ... and more to come on this one soon ...
Bye Antonio :thumbs_up_1:
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 11:12 am |
|
|
|