by JWintjes » Wed Nov 28, 2007 6:06 am
Anonymous wrote:
A captain of men at the onset, and a captain of men in the greatest adversity, that is what distinguish a great explorer from the pilot, or passenger, or a swift handed carpenter who stemmed a leak, aboard a ship of exploration. Shackleton had it, Erikson had it, Magellan had it, it may be politically incorrect to say it, and their other acts are reprehensible, but Cortez and Pizzaro had this. Columbus, not in so high a degree.
When Magellan fell, even his enemies, men he had demoted and degraded, lamented that their light and their mirror is gone. Unlikely will you find this magnitude of greatness from Yuri Grigarin, Chuck Yeager, or Neil Armstrong.
Again, to my shocking astonishment, I find myself in agreement with Chuck.
Shackleton is the triumph of willpower and leadership in the face of odds that on the face of it are impossible; Magellan would seem to me to be an excellent comparison.
Jorit
[quote="Anonymous"]
A captain of men at the onset, and a captain of men in the greatest adversity, that is what distinguish a great explorer from the pilot, or passenger, or a swift handed carpenter who stemmed a leak, aboard a ship of exploration. Shackleton had it, Erikson had it, Magellan had it, it may be politically incorrect to say it, and their other acts are reprehensible, but Cortez and Pizzaro had this. Columbus, not in so high a degree.
When Magellan fell, even his enemies, men he had demoted and degraded, lamented that their light and their mirror is gone. Unlikely will you find this magnitude of greatness from Yuri Grigarin, Chuck Yeager, or Neil Armstrong.[/quote]
Again, to my shocking astonishment, I find myself in agreement with Chuck.
Shackleton is the triumph of willpower and leadership in the face of odds that on the face of it are impossible; Magellan would seem to me to be an excellent comparison.
Jorit