by Werner » Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:08 am
My problem is it requires XP or later.
The PC associated with my work environment is still running 2000 pro (although it has a Radeon 9800, 2GB of memory and a 2GHz P4 on an Intel reference board, it is not considered Vista capable, although it runs Eve and Homeworld well. My Son gave me his Alienware laptop with XP, but it runs so over hot that a half-hour of runtime is about all the run time to expect from it before it has a heat crash.
I have access to one Vista machine, with an Asus P800E motherboard, 4GB of 4-way interleaved memory, an overclocked Prescott processor running around 4GHz, and an Asus X100, but it is not often available to me. Even this machine struggles with Rainbow Six Las Vegas. I wonder what they were thinking.
It's interesting that this Vista box is the only one that approaches an Alpha in spec and speed. Imagine what these games would be like on a machine with a terabyte of memory and, say, 512 processors.
It seems to me a huge gap still exists between 7,000 rpm ATA or SATA drives, and arrays of 15,000 U3 SCSI drives.
My problem is it requires XP or later.
The PC associated with my work environment is still running 2000 pro (although it has a Radeon 9800, 2GB of memory and a 2GHz P4 on an Intel reference board, it is not considered Vista capable, although it runs Eve and Homeworld well. My Son gave me his Alienware laptop with XP, but it runs so over hot that a half-hour of runtime is about all the run time to expect from it before it has a heat crash.
I have access to one Vista machine, with an Asus P800E motherboard, 4GB of 4-way interleaved memory, an overclocked Prescott processor running around 4GHz, and an Asus X100, but it is not often available to me. Even this machine struggles with Rainbow Six Las Vegas. I wonder what they were thinking.
It's interesting that this Vista box is the only one that approaches an Alpha in spec and speed. Imagine what these games would be like on a machine with a terabyte of memory and, say, 512 processors.
It seems to me a huge gap still exists between 7,000 rpm ATA or SATA drives, and arrays of 15,000 U3 SCSI drives.