by chuck » Mon Jan 16, 2012 2:44 pm
There are two conflicting demands on island placement. Ship handling demand the bridge be placed quite far forward, and flight deck management demand the island be placed far back.
The French let ship handling trump deck management and placed the island on Charles DeGualle far forward. Part of the reason given was the Island on the French ship can actually shelter parts of the flight deck used for flight prep from a head sea. The Russians resorted to an awkward compromise by making the island on the Kutnesov very long, thus putting the navigation bridge further forward and flight deck control center further back. The british didn't compromise and gave their QE class 2 islands. One forward for ship handling, and a separate one farther back for flight deck operations.
It appears the USN decided to let flight operation trump ship handling by moving the island far back.
There are two conflicting demands on island placement. Ship handling demand the bridge be placed quite far forward, and flight deck management demand the island be placed far back.
The French let ship handling trump deck management and placed the island on Charles DeGualle far forward. Part of the reason given was the Island on the French ship can actually shelter parts of the flight deck used for flight prep from a head sea. The Russians resorted to an awkward compromise by making the island on the Kutnesov very long, thus putting the navigation bridge further forward and flight deck control center further back. The british didn't compromise and gave their QE class 2 islands. One forward for ship handling, and a separate one farther back for flight deck operations.
It appears the USN decided to let flight operation trump ship handling by moving the island far back.