by Olaf Held » Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:30 am
Hi Dan ~ The paint used on the funnel cap was either your Emulsion 95, which is stated in the 1941 paint regulation as *Wasserfarbe Hellgrau* (light grey, based on water, aqua colour, whatever) or the RAL 9006 Aluminiumbronze (similar name in English) which had a bit of a shiny appearance like aluminum/aluminium. However, a few ships had the funnel cap painted black or even incorporated into a camouflage scheme. The heat resistance applies only to the insides of the funnels and funnel caps (as far as I understand the paint regulation).
There is no reference whatsoever about special grey tones used for the Baltic camouflage. As far as I know, this camouflage was directly applied on the so-called piecetime livery (some call it the 50/51 scheme), which is the standard livery of RAL 7001 (Hellgrau 50) on the superstructure and RAL 7000 (Dunkelgrau 51) on the hull. However, there are two camouflage greys (light and dark) noted in the 1941 paint regulation (the 1944 edition has much more). According to that 1941 paper, these two grey tones were used during the construction period. Whatever that means. The light tone is lighter than RAL 7001, the darker is darker than 7000. There are no RAL-numbers available for them. But I don't think they used these for the Baltic camouflage.
On the S&S sets the information seems to be misleading. I only can assume that during the research the 1944 grey tones for camouflage purposes accidently were considered, not known by the researchers that these paints were not available in 1941. The same seems to have happened to the authors of the ADTK book. I have to look it up but they even don't mention the 1941 (and earlier) paint regulations.
There was a light grey used in the Baltic during the last month of the war. I have no idea if this was RAL 7038 or even RAL 7035. Many ships were painted light grey, of course with exceptions such as Prinz Eugen. The only (secondary source) reference I know is Hans-Georg Prager's book on Deutschland/L�tzow in which there is an illustration of the ship with the Baltic stripes applied. I have to look it up but most if not all RAL numbers mentioned there are wrong (when we assume that the paint regulations are the only truth!).
The 50/51 scheme we know from WWII ships was no different to the scheme of WWI ships. They had no RAL numbers of course, but the appearance of the ships was more or less the same. Maybe they were adding this or that to the paints, but the basic scheme was the same from I think 1896 on.
Hope this helps a bit.
Happy painting ~ Olaf!
Hi Dan ~ The paint used on the funnel cap was either your Emulsion 95, which is stated in the 1941 paint regulation as *Wasserfarbe Hellgrau* (light grey, based on water, aqua colour, whatever) or the RAL 9006 Aluminiumbronze (similar name in English) which had a bit of a shiny appearance like aluminum/aluminium. However, a few ships had the funnel cap painted black or even incorporated into a camouflage scheme. The heat resistance applies only to the insides of the funnels and funnel caps (as far as I understand the paint regulation).
There is no reference whatsoever about special grey tones used for the Baltic camouflage. As far as I know, this camouflage was directly applied on the so-called piecetime livery (some call it the [color=#FF0000]50[/color]/[color=#FF0000]51[/color] scheme), which is the standard livery of RAL 7001 (Hellgrau [color=#FF0000]50[/color]) on the superstructure and RAL 7000 (Dunkelgrau [color=#FF0000]51[/color]) on the hull. However, there are two camouflage greys (light and dark) noted in the 1941 paint regulation (the 1944 edition has much more). According to that 1941 paper, these two grey tones were used during the construction period. Whatever that means. The light tone is lighter than RAL 7001, the darker is darker than 7000. There are no RAL-numbers available for them. But I don't think they used these for the Baltic camouflage.
On the S&S sets the information seems to be misleading. I only can assume that during the research the 1944 grey tones for camouflage purposes accidently were considered, not known by the researchers that these paints were not available in 1941. The same seems to have happened to the authors of the ADTK book. I have to look it up but they even don't mention the 1941 (and earlier) paint regulations.
There was a light grey used in the Baltic during the last month of the war. I have no idea if this was RAL 7038 or even RAL 7035. Many ships were painted light grey, of course with exceptions such as Prinz Eugen. The only (secondary source) reference I know is Hans-Georg Prager's book on Deutschland/L�tzow in which there is an illustration of the ship with the Baltic stripes applied. I have to look it up but most if not all RAL numbers mentioned there are wrong (when we assume that the paint regulations are the only truth!).
The 50/51 scheme we know from WWII ships was no different to the scheme of WWI ships. They had no RAL numbers of course, but the appearance of the ships was more or less the same. Maybe they were adding this or that to the paints, but the basic scheme was the same from I think 1896 on.
Hope this helps a bit.
Happy painting ~ Olaf!