Advice on scale: according to detail

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:smallsmile: :wave_1: :big_grin: :thumbs_up_1: :heh: :cool_1: :cool_2: :woo_hoo:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Advice on scale: according to detail

Re: Advice on scale: according to detail

by GazzaS » Wed Aug 13, 2014 12:05 am

Thank you Dave. That was exactly the kind of answer I was looking for because lack-of-detail is what I'll have. I've yet to see a picture that isn't either a full-hull shot, or taken after many years of encrustation.

Re: Advice on scale: according to detail

by Dave Wooley » Tue Aug 12, 2014 4:49 pm

Hi GazzaS when faced with this problem go for a scale that can absorb the lack of fine detail say 1: 200 , 1;144 . As time progresses and more information comes to light then the omitted detail can then be added if at all possible . From 1;100 and above the fine detail or the lack of it will show. Hope this helps
Dave Wooley

Advice on scale: according to detail

by GazzaS » Sun Aug 10, 2014 7:34 pm

Hi All,
I've got some great shipyard plans for SMS Brummer in 1/200. There are details like coal schutes, vent tubes, life boats, davits, torpedo tubes, ladders, stairs, even railings and rigging. There are lots of hull cross sections and screw and rudder detail at scales as large as 1/50.
What I'm missing are those little things that don't show on the diagram: Firefighting equipment, Bridge equipment, Optics other than the most simplified of range-finders, and all of those little things that crowd the deck of a ship. Finding photographic evidence online, especially since I can only read English, isn't proving very fruitful.

Based on this detail/lack of detail, what scale would you recommend?

Thanks, in advance!

Top