by Guest » Tue Nov 25, 2014 9:36 pm
After further searching I have determined above-deck structures can be both ways, therefore I am going to build the two main single level above-deck houses with their decks parallel to the waterline.
Photographic evidence is not conclusive on this because the photos are so small and too much detail is lost when attempting to enlarge the images. What I realized I could do is measure the rake angle of the stack against the waterline then compare the angle taken from the top of the aft house. The base of the angle appeared to coincide with the top of the aft house, indicating parallelism with the waterline. When I tried this with the shear the angle didn't match. There's more than one way to skin a cat.
A small structure, about 8' x 8', located at the stern, is parallel to the shear, where the shear sweeps up very noticeably, this is confirmed by photographic evidence of the ship.
biggles2, thanks, I appreciate your help regarding this pesky design problem.
Jim
After further searching I have determined above-deck structures can be both ways, therefore I am going to build the two main single level above-deck houses with their decks parallel to the waterline.
Photographic evidence is not conclusive on this because the photos are so small and too much detail is lost when attempting to enlarge the images. What I realized I could do is measure the rake angle of the stack against the waterline then compare the angle taken from the top of the aft house. The base of the angle appeared to coincide with the top of the aft house, indicating parallelism with the waterline. When I tried this with the shear the angle didn't match. There's more than one way to skin a cat.
A small structure, about 8' x 8', located at the stern, is parallel to the shear, where the shear sweeps up very noticeably, this is confirmed by photographic evidence of the ship.
biggles2, thanks, I appreciate your help regarding this pesky design problem.
Jim