by Timmy C » Mon Jul 04, 2016 2:31 pm
biggles2 wrote: When the railings are placed, they (the tapered end sections) restrict rotation of that turret. On the real ship, did they have to fold down that rail section to allow full rotation, or is that some possible flaw from Dragon, where they may have made the deck cabin too narrow?
Two things that "artificially" restrict your kit turrets' rotational space: firstly, the real railing stanchions were placed on the
vertical edges of the deck (i.e. the bulkhead below), not on the horizontal part, and secondly, PE railings are immensely overscale in thickness, occupying even more room when fixed on the deck's horizontal surface.
That being said, even the real ships lowered their stanchions for battle or replenishment, though I'm not sure if that's just for precaution or because they would otherwise directly interfere.
[quote="biggles2"] When the railings are placed, they (the tapered end sections) restrict rotation of that turret. On the real ship, did they have to fold down that rail section to allow full rotation, or is that some possible flaw from Dragon, where they may have made the deck cabin too narrow?[/quote]
Two things that "artificially" restrict your kit turrets' rotational space: firstly, the real railing stanchions were placed on the [url=http://www.navsource.org/archives/05/pix2/0543252.jpg]vertical edges of the deck[/url] (i.e. the bulkhead below), not on the horizontal part, and secondly, PE railings are immensely overscale in thickness, occupying even more room when fixed on the deck's horizontal surface.
That being said, even the real ships lowered their stanchions for battle or replenishment, though I'm not sure if that's just for precaution or because they would otherwise directly interfere.