by pgollin » Mon Mar 04, 2019 6:53 am
.
Remember your lessons from Eisenhower !
The "military-industrial-complex" has a vested interest in government spending.
And before anyone goes mad, Eisenhower's argument was a bit more complex. The UK and US governments learnt from WW2 that military requirements drove scientific and engineering research and development which eventually benefitted civilian life (e.g. cavity magnetron to microwave ovens - "radar grills"). The trouble was that the military got hooked on money - and Eisenhower thought that the M-I-Complex was too powerful and corrupting the government's decision making process. They developed "pork-barrel" politics to a great degree, which merely makes matters worse.
Now, the process is near enough just a game, with the M-I-Complex just pushing buttons and their cowed senators and governors merely willing dupes (the same applies to the UK where certain firms (e.g. BAE) hold similar favoured positions).
There is no way that the USN is serious about getting rid of Truman, that is just a stupid joke - the fact that such an obviously false offer can be made just shows how much contempt the Navy and M-I-Complex have for the government.
.
Remember your lessons from Eisenhower !
The "military-industrial-complex" has a vested interest in government spending.
And before anyone goes mad, Eisenhower's argument was a bit more complex. The UK and US governments learnt from WW2 that military requirements drove scientific and engineering research and development which eventually benefitted civilian life (e.g. cavity magnetron to microwave ovens - [i]"radar grills"[/i]). The trouble was that the military got hooked on money - and Eisenhower thought that the M-I-Complex was too powerful and corrupting the government's decision making process. They developed "pork-barrel" politics to a great degree, which merely makes matters worse.
Now, the process is near enough just a game, with the M-I-Complex just pushing buttons and their cowed senators and governors merely willing dupes (the same applies to the UK where certain firms (e.g. BAE) hold similar favoured positions).
There is no way that the USN is serious about getting rid of Truman, that is just a stupid joke - the fact that such an obviously false offer can be made just shows how much contempt the Navy and M-I-Complex have for the government.