by Rick E Davis » Sun Jun 17, 2012 1:16 pm
I was out of town, so I'm late to respond.
I'm not a camo expert, but I have seen NO evidence that CASSIN YOUNG started out in Ms 32/1D nor ever wore it. The photo I posted above was taken on 15 January 1944 shortly after her commissioning on 31 December 1943 ... so if she "started out" in Ms 32/1D it was while building. I have come across photos of ships painted in schemes while they are building that were not used at the time the ship was commissioned, so that is possible. Also, some destroyers were indeed painted in one dazzle scheme and then repainted to another after a short period for one reason or another. However, based on this photo of a "well worn" MS 32/7D on CASSIN YOUNG in a photo dated 26 October 1944, shows her still in Ms 32/7D. Shortly after this date, she would have been repainted into Ms 21. So I'm pretty sure that CASSIN YOUNG's only dazzle scheme was Ms 32/7D.
The Ship Camouflage website has many errors that Tracy and others are trying to correct. Several researches of specific destroyers I have talked to have told me that there are errors recorded for their ships in this database. While trying to identify unknown destroyers, I have found additional errors for reported schemes that the ship in question never wore. I have come across a few photos at the National Archives that show schemes not listed in the Ship Camouflage Database. The Ship Camouflage Database has been around for a long time, predating Tracy's involvement (maybe even his birth

) and the origins of some of the schemes listed are unknown. I think Lee Johnson will be the first to admit that he does NOT have the final answer for every FLETCHER that wore dazzle camo, but he is the one person I know who has focused on researching the answer and bases his listing on having an identified photo of the scheme and has come up with an answer for most units in the class.
I was out of town, so I'm late to respond.
I'm not a camo expert, but I have seen NO evidence that CASSIN YOUNG started out in Ms 32/1D nor ever wore it. The photo I posted above was taken on 15 January 1944 shortly after her commissioning on 31 December 1943 ... so if she "started out" in Ms 32/1D it was while building. I have come across photos of ships painted in schemes while they are building that were not used at the time the ship was commissioned, so that is possible. Also, some destroyers were indeed painted in one dazzle scheme and then repainted to another after a short period for one reason or another. However, based on this photo of a "well worn" MS 32/7D on CASSIN YOUNG in a photo dated 26 October 1944, shows her still in Ms 32/7D. Shortly after this date, she would have been repainted into Ms 21. So I'm pretty sure that CASSIN YOUNG's only dazzle scheme was Ms 32/7D.
[img]http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p303/TincanREDavis/DD793x10-26Oct44lr.jpg[/img]
The Ship Camouflage website has many errors that Tracy and others are trying to correct. Several researches of specific destroyers I have talked to have told me that there are errors recorded for their ships in this database. While trying to identify unknown destroyers, I have found additional errors for reported schemes that the ship in question never wore. I have come across a few photos at the National Archives that show schemes not listed in the Ship Camouflage Database. The Ship Camouflage Database has been around for a long time, predating Tracy's involvement (maybe even his birth :big_grin: ) and the origins of some of the schemes listed are unknown. I think Lee Johnson will be the first to admit that he does NOT have the final answer for every FLETCHER that wore dazzle camo, but he is the one person I know who has focused on researching the answer and bases his listing on having an identified photo of the scheme and has come up with an answer for most units in the class.