by CLASSIC WARSHIPS » Mon May 09, 2016 10:38 am
Antonio,
Please be aware that I am not trying to step on anyone's feet, nor am I trying to support anyone, in this case John Asmussen. I wrote the book(s) review as I, or anyone else would have seen it when we receive those books in the mail. I am also trying to walk the thin line between everyone in this situation, as I prefer to be friends with everyone involved.
I wrote this review because many persons have asked me if these are good books to buy. What I wrote about them is what I see as I turn the pages and my opinion on that.
I have worked with John Asmussen in the past. I have worked with you in the past. I would like to continue to do that, so I am not taking sides in this argument between yourself and John. I wish to remain neutral.
I hear your complaint about your claim that your research has been used to create these books and you were not credited for that in these books. Am I correct in saying this ?
Is there a chance that John Asmussen has looked into the same research as you, because you have looked there ?
I myself have done this after reading something from another author and then going to look for the same research and using that in one of my books. Sometimes authors and researchers find the same information, even if they are not working together?
Again, please understand that I am not favoring anyone here, or in my review of those books, only giving a review of what I see in them as I turn the pages. Believe me, there is bad blood in the creation of those books. I, more than anyone else, know this, as that project was my creation, but I got pushed out by the publisher. Long story which I will not go into, but please realize those books do elevate my blood pressure.
Sincerely,
Steve Wiper
Antonio,
Please be aware that I am not trying to step on anyone's feet, nor am I trying to support anyone, in this case John Asmussen. I wrote the book(s) review as I, or anyone else would have seen it when we receive those books in the mail. I am also trying to walk the thin line between everyone in this situation, as I prefer to be friends with everyone involved.
I wrote this review because many persons have asked me if these are good books to buy. What I wrote about them is what I see as I turn the pages and my opinion on that.
I have worked with John Asmussen in the past. I have worked with you in the past. I would like to continue to do that, so I am not taking sides in this argument between yourself and John. I wish to remain neutral.
I hear your complaint about your claim that your research has been used to create these books and you were not credited for that in these books. Am I correct in saying this ?
Is there a chance that John Asmussen has looked into the same research as you, because you have looked there ?
I myself have done this after reading something from another author and then going to look for the same research and using that in one of my books. Sometimes authors and researchers find the same information, even if they are not working together?
Again, please understand that I am not favoring anyone here, or in my review of those books, only giving a review of what I see in them as I turn the pages. Believe me, there is bad blood in the creation of those books. I, more than anyone else, know this, as that project was my creation, but I got pushed out by the publisher. Long story which I will not go into, but please realize those books do elevate my blood pressure.
Sincerely,
Steve Wiper