by Haijun watcher » Fri Dec 18, 2020 2:05 pm
While Russia moves faster than other Arctic powers on this...Canada continues to drag its feet:
Macleans
Can Canada keep up with a global icebreaker boom?
Russia, China and the United States are racing to build big ships meant to slice through ice in an Arctic region rich in natural resources and new shipping lanes. Canada's backyard is at stake.
By Nick Taylor-Vaisey December 17, 2020
Joe Clark wasn�t the first Canadian politician to promise the world�s most powerful icebreaker, and he won�t be the last. Clark, as foreign minister in 1985, staked his expensive pledge to build a ship that could slice through ice as thick as 2.5 m on the premise that the federal government was �not about to conclude that Canada cannot afford the Arctic.� That ship never got built. Today, as the climate warms, foreign icebreakers are exploring the Arctic for natural resources and asserting themselves in a region Canadians have long claimed is Canada. Clark�s icebreaker was supposed to replace a 20-year-old workhorse. Thirty-five years later, the CCGS Louis S. St-Laurent is still in service�and the Coast Guard likely won�t replace the country�s lone heavy icebreaker for at least another decade.
Canada�s frustrating, unending quest to build a new heavy icebreaker that can patrol Arctic waters is a mess of budget cuts and delays that no government has cleaned up. In 2008, then-prime minister Stephen Harper promised another ship, the Diefenbaker, first slated to be seaworthy by 2017. But the shipyard that won the contract, Vancouver�s Seaspan, lost the work in 2019 after too many delays. Last February, the feds pegged the new delivery date to the end of 2029 but haven�t officially reopened the bidding process.
(...SNIPPED)
While Russia moves faster than other Arctic powers on this...Canada continues to drag its feet:
[url=https://www.macleans.ca/politics/can-canada-keep-up-with-a-global-icebreaker-boom/?fbclid=IwAR2W1cJHeOm3CJ9MKn0uq_sWwiQ2o6CLnajizNtalwCR15WT07V9YosoZt8]Macleans[/url]
[quote][b][size=200]Can Canada keep up with a global icebreaker boom?[/size][/b]
Russia, China and the United States are racing to build big ships meant to slice through ice in an Arctic region rich in natural resources and new shipping lanes. Canada's backyard is at stake.
By Nick Taylor-Vaisey December 17, 2020
Joe Clark wasn�t the first Canadian politician to promise the world�s most powerful icebreaker, and he won�t be the last. Clark, as foreign minister in 1985, staked his expensive pledge to build a ship that could slice through ice as thick as 2.5 m on the premise that the federal government was �not about to conclude that Canada cannot afford the Arctic.� That ship never got built. Today, as the climate warms, foreign icebreakers are exploring the Arctic for natural resources and asserting themselves in a region Canadians have long claimed is Canada. Clark�s icebreaker was supposed to replace a 20-year-old workhorse. Thirty-five years later, the CCGS Louis S. St-Laurent is still in service�and the Coast Guard likely won�t replace the country�s lone heavy icebreaker for at least another decade.
Canada�s frustrating, unending quest to build a new heavy icebreaker that can patrol Arctic waters is a mess of budget cuts and delays that no government has cleaned up. In 2008, then-prime minister Stephen Harper promised another ship, the Diefenbaker, first slated to be seaworthy by 2017. But the shipyard that won the contract, Vancouver�s Seaspan, lost the work in 2019 after too many delays. Last February, the feds pegged the new delivery date to the end of 2029 but haven�t officially reopened the bidding process.
(...SNIPPED)[/quote]