The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Wed Aug 12, 2020 5:18 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: LCS disappointing
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 11:16 am
Posts: 341
Link: https://www.yahoo.com/news/why-u-navy-a ... _test=1_06


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: LCS disappointing
PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2018 12:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:06 am
Posts: 2660
Location: Vancouver, Canada
And speaking of the people who continue to perpetuate/fund this disappointment just to lock down votes who would keep them in power:

Defense News

Quote:
Alabama lawmaker accuses Navy secretary of endangering jobs, LCS future
By: David B. Larter   10 hours ago
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Navy’s top civilian bristled during congressional questioning Tuesday after Rep. Bradley Byrne, R-Ala., suggested the service was endangering shipyards and the broader defense industrial base by only requesting one littoral combat ship in 2019.

Byrne, whose district would be deeply affected if the Austal USA shipyard shuttered, accused Navy Secretary Richard Spencer and the service of slowing down the buying program and putting thousands of jobs in jeopardy.

“Since you’ve come on board, I haven’t seen you pick up the urgency on this program; in fact, I see the opposite,” Byrne said. “I think you are slowing down the program.”

Both shipyards have told Congress that if the Navy drops down to just one LCS, the yards would lay off thousands of workers and there would be a real risk that one or both of the LCS shipyards (located in Mobile, Alabama, and Marinette, Wisconsin) might have to close.
(...SNIPPED)

_________________
"Haijun" means "navy" in Mandarin Chinese.

"You have enemies? Good. It means you stood up for something in your life."- Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: LCS disappointing
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 3:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:06 am
Posts: 2660
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Despite this, there's too many entrenched political interests who want to ensure this particular program continues...

Task and Purpose/Business Insider

Quote:
The US Navy basically admitted that the Littoral Combat Ship looks like a massive failure

Jared Keller, Task & Purpose Apr. 14, 2018, 11:26 AM 40,101

  • The Navy “may not” deploy any of the dozen small surface combatants this year despite officials’ previous plans to deploy several to join the 7th and 5th Fleets in Singapore and Bahrain respectively, the US Naval Institute reported.
  • The report suggests that the Navy has run out of patience for the disappointment mill that is the Littoral Combat Ship, once the backbone of the future fleet that could have 355 ships.
  • A recent review of the Navy’s LCS fleet by the Pentagon’s operational testing and evaluation arm also revealed significant structural problems with the program’s Freedom and Independence variants
.


(...SNIPPED)

_________________
"Haijun" means "navy" in Mandarin Chinese.

"You have enemies? Good. It means you stood up for something in your life."- Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: LCS disappointing
PostPosted: Sun Sep 01, 2019 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:06 am
Posts: 2660
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Is it really that surprising that the poorly-armed LCS vessels lost a simulation against a Chinese opponent?

National Interest

Quote:
August 30, 2019
Simulation: U.S. Navy Littoral Combat Ships Lose the Battle for the South China Sea
Could this happen in real life?
by David Axe Follow @daxe on Twitter L
The U.S. Navy in late 2019 or 2020 expects to select a shipyard to build the fleet’s new guided-missile frigate.
The 20 heavily-armed frigates will replace roughly half of the 50 or so Littoral Combat Ships (LCS) that the Navy had planned to buy before realizing that the lightly-armed LCS likely couldn’t survive in a major shooting war.
Just how vulnerable is the LCS?
In 2013 journalist Kyle Mizokami put the speedy, 3,000-ton-displacement vessel to the test. Booting up Command: Modern Naval/Air Operations -- a high-end computer war game -- Mizokami pitted simulated LCSs against a Chinese flotilla.
“The result isn’t good — and a harrowing lesson to be cautious about how we equip the U.S. military,” Mizokami wrote.

(...SNIPPED)

_________________
"Haijun" means "navy" in Mandarin Chinese.

"You have enemies? Good. It means you stood up for something in your life."- Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: LCS disappointing
PostPosted: Sun Sep 01, 2019 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Posts: 11179
Location: Calgary, AB/Surrey, B.C., Canada
...a friggin' open-source video game? From seven years ago? But it is the National Interest after all...don't expect much from them.

_________________
De quoi s'agit-il?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: LCS disappointing
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:06 am
Posts: 2660
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Military.com

Quote:
New Law Restricts the Navy to 35 Littoral Combat Ships
23 Dec 2019
Military.com | By Richard Sisk
The defense bill signed by President Donald Trump last week limits the Navy to 35 Littoral Combat Ships (LCS) in the fleet and bars funding for more.
"None of the funds authorized" in the National Defense Authorization Act can be used to exceed "the total procurement quantity of 35 Littoral Combat Ships," Congress stipulated in the legislation.
To get a 36th LCS, the under secretary of defense for acquisition would have to go before the Senate and House Armed Services Committees to argue that an additional LCS is in the vital national security interests of the U.S., according to the legislation.

The action signals Congress' frustration with the LCS program's progress and an intention to switch focus to a new class of guided-missile frigates.
The limits on the LCS program are "necessary to maintain a full and open competition for the Guided Missile Frigate FFG(X) with a single source award in fiscal year 2020," the legislation states.
(...SNIPPED)

_________________
"Haijun" means "navy" in Mandarin Chinese.

"You have enemies? Good. It means you stood up for something in your life."- Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: LCS disappointing
PostPosted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 11:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:06 am
Posts: 2660
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Defense News

Quote:
US Navy proposes decommissioning first 4 LCS more than a decade early
By: David B. Larter   2 days ago
ELMER, New Jersey – The US Navy has put forward a proposal to decommission the first four littoral combat ships in 2021 as part of a cost-savings measure, according to a memorandum from the White House’s Office of Management and Budget to the Defense Department.
The memo obtained by Defense News outlines plans to decommission the littoral combat ships Freedom, Independence, Fort Worth and Coronado, part of an overall plan to shrink the size of the force to deal with a flat budget. The ships all have between a 12 and 17 years of planned hull life left.
The memo also outlines plans to decommission three dock landing ships Whidbey Island, Germantown and the Gunston Hall, between eight and 14 years early, as well as accelerating the decommissioning of four cruisers.

(...SNIPPED)

_________________
"Haijun" means "navy" in Mandarin Chinese.

"You have enemies? Good. It means you stood up for something in your life."- Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: LCS disappointing
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 5:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:23 am
Posts: 2893
Location: Copenhagen
This is interesting - not only LCS should be decommissioned earlier, but also several cruisers and LSD. That means that the fleet size will not be expanded, because there is apparently insufficient funding... Surprise! :lol_pound:

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: LCS disappointing
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 3:34 pm 
They should cut back on the ships they are building rather than decommissioning ships too early.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: LCS disappointing
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:06 am
Posts: 2660
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Military.com

Quote:
Navy's 1st 4 Littoral Combat Ships Head to Retirement as Shipbuilding Budget Drops
10 Feb 2020
Military.com | By Gina Harkins
The Navy is forging ahead with a plan to build a 355-ship fleet, but its construction budget for new warships is set to fall significantly in 2021.
The Navy will spend $16.4 billion on two new subs, a pair of destroyers, a next-generation frigate, an amphibious transport dock, and two towing, salvage and rescue vessels next year. The submarine builds will include plans for the first of the new Columbia-class subs along with one Virginia-class.
(...SNIPPED)

_________________
"Haijun" means "navy" in Mandarin Chinese.

"You have enemies? Good. It means you stood up for something in your life."- Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: LCS disappointing
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:35 pm
Posts: 2793
Location: UK
There are a few errors in that report which makes me wonder how much validity it has. But, if true, then I doubt the US Navy will even notice the loss of the first four LCS. They need to hurry up and decide which type of frigate they are going to order.

_________________
In 1757 Admiral John Byng was shot "pour encourager les autres". Voltaire


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: LCS disappointing
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:06 am
Posts: 2660
Location: Vancouver, Canada
At least the USN is starting to see this LCS "money pit" has gone on long enough...


Defense News

Quote:
US Navy’s first 4 littoral combat ships to leave the fleet in 9 months
By: David B. Larter   3 days ago

The littoral combat ship Fort Worth transits the Sulu Sea. Fort Worth will be in the mothball fleet next spring. (MC2 Joe Bishop/U.S. Navy)
WASHINGTON — The Navy’s first four littoral combat ships will be headed into mothballs next March, according to a June 20 message from the chief of naval operations.
The littoral combat ships Freedom, Independence, Fort Worth and Coronado will all be inactivated on March 31, 2021, with Coronado being commissioned just six years ago.
The Navy decided to cut the ships to save money on modernization efforts as it faces a mountain of shipbuilding bills and upgrade costs.
The ships were supposed to be used as test vessels for the continued standing up of the LCS class, but LCS 1 through 4 have just about reached the end of their usefulness as test vessels and are no longer worth a deeper financial investment, according to a February briefing by Rear Adm. Randy Crites, the deputy assistant secretary of the Navy for budget.
(...SNIPPED)

_________________
"Haijun" means "navy" in Mandarin Chinese.

"You have enemies? Good. It means you stood up for something in your life."- Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: LCS disappointing
PostPosted: Sat Aug 01, 2020 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:06 am
Posts: 2660
Location: Vancouver, Canada
The United States Navy trying to make the most of these ships while they are still in service?

Defense NEWS

Quote:
US Navy prepares major surge of littoral combat ship deployments
By: David B. Larter   22 hours ago
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Navy is taking major steps in an attempt to shake off years of false starts and setbacks with the Littoral Combat Ship program, an effort Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Michael Gilday said he’d oversee on his watch.
In an exclusive interview with Defense News on July 16, Gilday listed LCS as a major priority, saying he will turn up the heat on efforts to get the ship to become a major contributor to fleet operations.
“There are things in the near term that I have to deliver, that I’m putting heat on now, and one of them is LCS,” Gilday said. “One part is sustainability and reliability. We know enough about that platform and the problems that we have that plague us with regard to reliability and sustainability, and I need them resolved.”
(...SNIPPED)

_________________
"Haijun" means "navy" in Mandarin Chinese.

"You have enemies? Good. It means you stood up for something in your life."- Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: LCS disappointing
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 7:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:23 am
Posts: 2893
Location: Copenhagen
Still in service? Most of them will be probably still in service in 25 years.

Only the first four ships (LCS-1 to -4) are scheduled to be decommissioned early, probably because they have as test ships to many problems and were therefore not updated.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: LCS disappointing
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 3083
My idea has always been to use LCS as a command ship for corvettes and to carry a large number of UAVs. It would carry a ton of winged UAVs, coms gear, and carry a ton of fuel. They would deploy with lengthened Cyclone-class ships to accommodate Harpoons, 76mm, and SeaRAM or CIWS. The group would be called regional influence squadrons, and the LCS would be a command ship. They really can't do anything else other than defend themselves, but at least they could accommodate a ton of winged UAVs and a good communications suite.

_________________
Proper Preparation Prevents Poor Performance


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: wuhuilin11 and 12 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group