The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Tue Apr 16, 2024 3:48 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 9:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 4:25 am
Posts: 274
I'm reading "Hue 1968: A Turning Point of the American War in Vietnam" by Mark Bowden and it includes the following description of support provided by an unnamed battleship (USS New Jersey?):

"There was a steady roar of gunfire and explosions that would be eclipsed at intervals by the sound of a shell fired from one of the warships anchored fifteen to twenty miles east in the South China Sea. The biggest of their guns were sixteen-inchers, a term referring to the width of the barrel's bore. The gun itself was fifty times that long. It could hurl a projectile as heavy as a small car twenty-five miles. This would emerge in the general din as a low whistling that grew louder as it approached until it became a thing felt as much as heard, passing above the opaque ceiling of clouds like an airborne locomotive. The hurtling projective moved with such force that it pressed on the grunts' eardrums, and when it hit the ground, even at a distance, the earth shook. Walls crumbled."

The last few sentences really impressed on me the power of those guns. Is there footage that shows sustained bombardment from the ship's perspective or books that describe the effect of being on the receiving end? I've seen short clips from World War II but usually they're a few seconds at best. Also, would it have been the norm to anchor when providing shore support or was that specific to this situation?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2017 10:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:01 pm
Posts: 86
There are a lot of clips showing bombardment from the Gulf war using the same guns and a lot off accounts from times naval gunnery was used to break up German tank formations in France and Sicily

_________________
The most attractive project, to me, is the one that I've just heard someone say can't be done. :)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 7:50 pm
Posts: 32
I believe that the reason why they rarely would fire multiple guns on the same turret at once, was due to the fact that the concussion from the blast would force the shells away from each other. This would cause decreased accuracy.

This may also be completely incorrect. I don't remember were I heard it or if it is from a reputable source.

If it is true, that's a lot of power! Thinking about how much force it would take to move one of those shells off course with just the concussion blast makes my brain melt. :crazy:

_________________
Completed models:
1/350 USS Texas: http://www.shipmodels.info/mws_forum/viewtopic.php?f=60&t=165724

1/700 USS Massachusetts: http://www.shipmodels.info/mws_forum/viewtopic.php?t=166495

Working on:
1/700 IJN Musashi


Last edited by Chelonian on Tue Oct 24, 2017 1:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2017 11:01 am 
At the muzzle, a nudge of a few seconds of arc would, after a flight of 25 miles, result in missing the target by a large margin.

To mitigate this, the guns are not fired simultaneously but, with use of an intervalometer, are ripple fired.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2017 12:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 3121
DougC wrote:
At the muzzle, a nudge of a few seconds of arc would, after a flight of 25 miles, result in missing the target by a large margin.

To mitigate this, the guns are not fired simultaneously but, with use of an intervalometer, are ripple fired.

Solid. Thank you for making that point. This was actually a big deal with the New Jersey when reactivated in the 1980s. The GFCS was modified to fire simultaneously. It was immediately reversed, returning to ripple fire.

_________________
Proper Preparation Prevents Poor Performance


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2017 12:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2016 6:08 pm
Posts: 240
Location: Yorktown, Indiana, USA
The delay between firing the guns within the turrets is to distribute the recoil stress.

The source of the New Jersey's accuracy errors in Viet Nam was investigated and found to be discrepancies in the way the Mk 8 system calculated initial velocities (IV). There are a number of factors which affect IV, the solution was to fit a small Doppler radar on top of each turret to measure the actual IV of each projectile as it left the barrel. Turret Officers paid particular attention to ensuring the powder used during a shoot was from the same lot if possible, as the slight variations in powder composition between lots was enough to introduce accuracy errors.

_________________
https://inchhighguy.wordpress.com/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2017 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:23 am
Posts: 1098
Location: Northern Virginia
Just to digress, here is a link to a very interesting article regarding shipboard HIMARS use

Marines Fire HIMARS From Ship in Sea Control Experiment With Navy
https://news.usni.org/2017/10/24/marines-fire-himars-ship-sea-control-experiment-navy?utm_source=USNI+News&utm_campaign=336284f665-USNI_NEWS_DAILY&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_0dd4a1450b-336284f665-230398533&mc_cid=336284f665&mc_eid=6659c3f603


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group