The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 3:00 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 07, 2019 5:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 8:05 pm
Posts: 625
Location: Ayer, Ma. USA
Two parter article on concepts and rethinking of the future US submarine construction. Among the interesting ideas: the abandonment of the water moderated reactor and using a molten salt reactor, which operates at higher temperatures and lower pressures, as well as being inherently safer. Smaller SSNS with more automation and smaller crews. Intriguing ideas.

http://cimsec.org/time-to-re-task-downsize-and-re-engineer-the-ssn-part-1/40468
http://cimsec.org/time-to-re-task-downsize-and-re-engineer-the-ssn-part-ii/40472

_________________
Tom Dougherty
Researcher for: "Project Azorian”
https://www.amazon.com/Azorian-Raising-K-129-Michael-White/dp/B008QTU7QY
"Project Azorian: The CIA and the Raising of the K-129" Book
https://www.usni.org/press/books/project-azorian


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2019 8:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:35 pm
Posts: 2834
Location: UK
He makes some good points but I think the USN should seriously consider building some SSKs to supplement the SSNs. Nuclear propulsion has many advantages, but it is noisy and cannot be switched off to avoid detection. The new AIP systems in conventional boats afford much quieter operation and presumably are being further developed to enhance endurance while the boat is submerged.

What he says about weapons is very true. The US needs to sort out its ASW arsenal and provide its navy with superior weaponry.

_________________
In 1757 Admiral John Byng was shot "pour encourager les autres". Voltaire


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2019 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 484
Amazing that the Sodium Reactor continues to be put forward as if it were 'new'.

The Second US SSN - Seawolf, had a sodium reactor which was quickly replaced after the vessel comissioned.

1957-1958. This is not a new concept.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Seawolf_(SSN-575)

And yes - the USN should be looking at non-nuclear Submarine options, probably in conjunction with Submarine Tenders for area deployments generating high cycles of actual hull time on station.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:18 pm 
A sodium rector would be more compact, more efficient and more safe than a PLWR. However, as Rickover pointed out, sodium reacts badly with water. One would not want to use it in a vessel surrounded by water.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group