The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Wed May 14, 2025 7:50 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:23 am
Posts: 1098
Location: Northern Virginia
Does that mean that problems are now solved?

Quote:
Repairs Complete, The GW Heads To Japan
Norfolk Virginian-Pilot
August 22, 2008
By Matthew Jones, The Virginian-Pilot

The carrier George Washington left San Diego on Thursday, bound once again for Japan after undergoing several months of repairs caused by a shipboard fire.

The ship will replace the carrier Kitty Hawk as the Navy’s only forward deployed carrier when it docks in Yokosuka, Japan.

The fire that sidelined the carrier broke out in late May, while the ship was in the Pacific Ocean off the South American Coast.

The blaze injured three dozen sailors. It began in a boiler exhaust and supply area, and was ultimately attributed to unauthorized smoking near improperly stored flammable liquids and other combustible materials.

The incident led the Navy to replace the ship’s commanding and executive officers.

The ship left Norfolk in early April. About 2,800 crew members stayed on board in San Diego for the repairs after the carrier entered the shipyard in late May. Many of the sailors’ families are either headed to or already in Japan.



Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 2:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:21 pm
Posts: 3383
Location: equidistant to everywhere
Boiler exhaust? GW is nuclear powered.

_________________
Assessing the impact of new area rug under modeling table.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 10:23 am 
Maybe they have a boiler to do with other things? Heat the ship up? Power the catapults maybe?

I DUNNO BILLY!


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:10 am
Posts: 2299
Location: (42.24,-87.81)
I know subs use saturated steam. Is the same true of carriers?

_________________
If an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.

-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:02 pm
Posts: 250
Location: Connecticut
Werner wrote:
I know subs use saturated steam. Is the same true of carriers?


Yup! :thumbs_up_1:

As a matter of fact many of the Navy's first Nuke plant operators on Submarines had "BT" ( Boiler Tech) ratings.

_________________
"When you shoot at a Destroyer and miss. It's like hit'in a wildcat in the A-- with a banjo" !
Lt. Joe Willingham Skipper USS Tautog SS-199

Life is Good/ DBF
Walt


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2464
Location: Hoboken, NJ
chuck wrote:
Boiler exhaust? GW is nuclear powered.


It's still a steam plant, though. That's all any nuclear plant ever does, including land based electrical plants: The reaction heats water to make steam, that steam turns the turbines, the rotation of those turbines produces electricity.

_________________
We like our history sanitized and theme-parked and self-congratulatory, not bloody and angry and unflattering. - Jonathan Yardley


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:31 am
Posts: 88
Location: Salzburg
It's interesting that a lot of people think whatever if they only her "nuclear powered" Matter of fact is that EVERY "nuclear powered" ship and that includes even a submarine is a "steam-powered-ship" The Nuclear power is "only" the power source, just like Diesel, fuel oil or coal.

Whenever you tell that to people they start to grin thinking you are trying to tease them. Specially if you are trying to tell them that today's most modern submarines are actually steam powered!

Besides of that, in an earlier post it was said that the damage to GW was serious, giving the impression as if the repair would take a long time. And now everything seems to be over in a very short time. Are there any news if the damage was really THAT serious or was this only an attempt to make a mountain out of a molehill?

Keep on modeling
René
www.usns.biz

_________________
http://www.usns.biz
keep on modeling!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2464
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Rene wrote:
Besides of that, in an earlier post it was said that the damage to GW was serious, giving the impression as if the repair would take a long time. And now everything seems to be over in a very short time. Are there any news if the damage was really THAT serious or was this only an attempt to make a mountain out of a molehill?


I imagine that it did take a long time in man hours, but the Navy threw as many men at the problem as they possibly could. It's probably a good bet that the repairs are not 100% complete; she's in good enough condition to make the transit, but during that transit they'll have contractors on board, and the ship's force working at maximum capacity.

_________________
We like our history sanitized and theme-parked and self-congratulatory, not bloody and angry and unflattering. - Jonathan Yardley


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group