Seasick wrote:
Far from it. Its never been a problem.
I know you don't like guns, but you need more than 1 gun on a ship, and they need to be spread out across the length of the ship so if one end of your ship gets messed up or one mount goes down you can at least fight with the other one.
Quote:
The Spruance class and the Oliver Hazard Perry class didn't loose any capabilities because of the above deck hangers.
See above. The Sprucans only had two 5" guns. The Perry only had 1 missile launcher and 1 gun. If the front of the Spruance got messed up its forward gun and ASROC launcher/VLS was gone. Oh, wait, but the helo hanger is okay. Yeah. No problem there. It would, however, still have a 5” gun for basic self defense. For a large ship like the Spruance that is a problem. For the Perry, well, it's a compromise ship anyway, so for the cheaper platform you have to do with less, and your available space is less.
Quote:
Both classes over their service lives have had their hangers enlarged and reconfigured, this would not have been possible if they were below deck.
The DDs and FFGs were ASW ships, so modifying their hangers made sense. We changed from a really small helo (Seasprite) to a moderately large helo (Seahawk). Those helos had missions that needed a little more room. A battleship would have utility helos with torpedoes just in case your ASW ship needed one or 2 more birds. So, unless we are going to shift from the Seahawk to a super huge helo, I don't understand how the hanger would need to be expanded much if at all.
So, the below deck hanger could stay the same size as long as we use the same size helos. Is there something wrong with that logic?
Concerning the size needed for a helo, look at how retarded narrow the hangers on Perry FFs are. Super, uber narrow. Even the ones on the Burkes are jammed into the ship, so while I would have a pretty decently large hanger on the battleship, the Perrys and Burkes show how very, very small the hangers can be if they need to be.
Quote:
Below decks hangers require...a heavy lift elevator to function. These items are very heavy and encroach on valuable below decks space.
Yep they sure do. More weapons for a capital ship in need of delivering high volumes of ordnance is more important than the convenience of an above deck hanger. There are ways to get an elevator up to the main deck without its main hydraulic drive.
Russ2146 wrote:
I still don't think you'd get the needed hanger height if you put it all the way back at the stern.
Here is a very rough size comparison. I took the length of the full line drawing and divided it by the length of the folded SH-60. The ratio of the Seahawk is 1/30.7ish. So, I made a little rectangle 1/31th the length of the ship's line drawing. So, this is for the purposes of this preliminary level of discussion, no real dimensions yet.
Attachment:
Montana sternguts.jpg
So, here you can see the general relationship. Now for the depth necessary, if a level on a ship is 8' (which is true for the DDGs and LSDs I have been on) you get 16' for two levels below decks. Like in a well-deck, if you need 20', you make a 20' box and put a step latter making up the difference if you are going from the standard level into the deeper compartment. So, here in the battleship, the bottom of the hanger would actually be on the armored 2nd deck. If we have the opportunity to build a new ship or to start at the armored deck and not have to cut through everything to get down to that armored deck, all we would have to do is take the slope out of the armored deck that follows the upward sweep of the stern and make it level, giving us another 2' for the length of the hanger. That gives us the 20' we would need, and if we need more than 20', we just cut into Kentucky's armored deck the foot-print of the hanger and make the deck a little deeper.
Russ2146 wrote:
As to Seasick's comments, Use a large amount of displacement? Is the cube of the hanger greater than the compartments it replaces? Is its weight greater?
Great question. The internal area is another advantage to a battleship. You have so few people on such a huge ship.