The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Wed May 14, 2025 8:05 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 4:46 pm
Posts: 33
Time to stir up the pot again. Anyone remember this:

Image

It's one of the many different Sea Control Ship concepts explored by the US Navy. The idea was to build a lot of smaller ships for convoy escort, anti-submarine patrol, and other missions where risking a supercarrier wasn't required. A few years later the US Navy sold those plans to Spain (Spain sold them to Thailand) and they became this:

Image

Is it better to have a lot of smaller ships that can be easily replaced, or a few large ships that cannot? Are the US Navy supercarriers "too many eggs in one basket"? Weapons free... You may fire at will.

Image


:destroyer:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 8:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10565
Location: EG48
It depends on the nation and what they can afford. For many countries, even a small carrier is too many eggs in one basket.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2011 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:35 pm
Posts: 2834
Location: UK
Well the US Navy has more carriers than the rest of the world combined (I think) so they are having their cake and eating it. :smallsmile:

_________________
In 1757 Admiral John Byng was shot "pour encourager les autres". Voltaire


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:25 am
Posts: 65
When the concept came up in the late 70s, it certainly was an interesting variant on the CVE.

In this opinion, VTOL fixed wing high performance aircraft never "grew" to the expectations of the SCS. The Sea Harrier and AV-8B were "about as good as it gets."

However now with high-capability UAVs...?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun May 01, 2011 11:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 8:41 pm
Posts: 102
Rockwell was building the next generation VTOL fighter for the Navy, The XFV-12, that was part of the SCS equation, but it turned out to be a huge disappointment and was canceled. That pretty much killed the SCS concept.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2011 4:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:23 am
Posts: 100
Location: Bolton, UK
Yeap the XFV-12 was a bit of a farce, its a pity the Convair(Gen Dynamics) 200 didn't get the development funding as the technology was probably more viable and would have given the US a VTOL aircraft similar in configuration to the Yak-141 but about 10 yrs earlier (plus would have probably taken the F-35B out of the JSF program too !)

Anyway the Sea Control Ship was a nice little ship design and a fun one to build:-

Image
Image
Image
Image

_________________
Currently planning CVA-01 scratchbuild in 1/700
Also planning RN projects 363, 381, 382, 387, Type 82(as designed), Type 43.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group