The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Wed Jul 30, 2025 12:44 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 580 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 29  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 3:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 1:51 pm
Posts: 2874
MikeGell wrote:
Remove the standard plank length markings that all line up, Hoods planks were not lined up like this. The planks do not match up across the beam as you can see when she is being built. This incorrect planking has been picked up on from the polish profiles by most of the deck makers.


Actually, some pics show that they were

Image

Just follow the planks at the far bottom left, and the 3 additional planks of the same length spaced out every 5 planks.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 12:17 am 
Offline
PontosModel
PontosModel
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:26 am
Posts: 1002
Location: Korea
Generally we realize same planks every 4 line so every 5 spaces is no problem.
And we would design 1.0mm width planks based on 8in/200 plank width.

We have applied the 2nd try for the funnel.
Image

Thank you
Keumho Kim

_________________
Image
Keumho Kim of Pontosmodel
help@pontosmodel.com
http://pontosmodel.com
Shop: http://hobbydecal.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 12:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 1:06 am
Posts: 972
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
I never thought I would buy a 1/200 ship kit, but this one is pushing me to! Let's see if Pontos will win me over and I could grab a Trumpeter Hood!! Anyway still have a lot in stash and as long as this set is going to be continuously made, I am in no hurry!

Hats off to Pontos for producing such a high quality set and so far this is one of the very few companies that cares for details and accuracy!
:thumbs_up_1: :thumbs_up_1:
Aop

_________________
On the way:
--1/350 Tamiya DKM Tirpitz Nov 1944

--1/350 scratch-build HMS Lion never built battleship (1938)

And our artworks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 12:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 343
MikeGell wrote:
Mr Allen , do you have access to the info Model Monkey would need?


I have plans that could be used. These can help with the dimensions of the funnels. I'm sure we can find additional info as well.

Not sure what we'd do about suitable replacement photoetch (pe) if a replacement funnel is created though: It sounds like Pontos will release pe for the kit's funnels as-is (slightly different sizes). I suppose the work around would be to use Pontos fore funnel pe for the fore funnel for one and the kit's original fore funnel cage and internal pe for the other. It will possibly look somewhat different due to the difference in quality/detail, but it should still work.

_________________
Frank Allen
H.M.S. Hood Association
http://www.hmshood.org.uk
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 12:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 343
Pontosmodel wrote:
We have applied the 2nd try for the funnel.
Image
Thank you
Keumho Kim


Beautiful!

_________________
Frank Allen
H.M.S. Hood Association
http://www.hmshood.org.uk
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 12:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 1:06 am
Posts: 972
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
FW_Allen wrote:
MikeGell wrote:
Mr Allen , do you have access to the info Model Monkey would need?


I have plans that could be used. These can help with the dimensions of the funnels. I'm sure we can find additional info as well.

Not sure what we'd do about suitable replacement photoetch (pe) if a replacement funnel is created though: It sounds like Pontos will release pe for the kit's funnels as-is (slightly different sizes). I suppose the work around would be to use Pontos fore funnel pe for the fore funnel for one and the kit's original fore funnel cage and internal pe for the other. It will possibly look somewhat different due to the difference in quality/detail, but it should still work.

Actually, if Pontos would be able to supply a separate set of fore funnel's PE already designed, that would be great. Anyway it is up to the manufacturers themselves to decide. Also, Model monkey's replacement funnel will need to be identical to the Trumpeter's fore funnel as well so to take the Pontos PE or that supplied in the kit. But if Steve follows the original plans, then PE can't be used or need adjustments, right?

Aop

_________________
On the way:
--1/350 Tamiya DKM Tirpitz Nov 1944

--1/350 scratch-build HMS Lion never built battleship (1938)

And our artworks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 12:55 am 
Offline
PontosModel
PontosModel
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:26 am
Posts: 1002
Location: Korea
Well As for the funnel, we have discussed internally,
The main problem is all of the funnel base parts and upper parts of both funnels are all different sizes.
I think a lowest cost way that two owners of this kit can swap each other as one for two fore funnels and the other after.

Image

Thank you
Keumho Kim

_________________
Image
Keumho Kim of Pontosmodel
help@pontosmodel.com
http://pontosmodel.com
Shop: http://hobbydecal.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 1:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 1:06 am
Posts: 972
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
That sounds like a good solution, but as Mr. Allen said, the fore funnel is the more correct one, so the person who gets two aft funnels will be on his own! And the person who gets two fore funnels is lucky! Anyway at least the funnels' dimentions will eventually be the same.

Aop

_________________
On the way:
--1/350 Tamiya DKM Tirpitz Nov 1944

--1/350 scratch-build HMS Lion never built battleship (1938)

And our artworks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 1:56 am 
Offline
SovereignHobbies
SovereignHobbies

Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 9:09 am
Posts: 1191
Location: Aberdeenshire, Scotland, UK
Whilst I understand that the detail up set needs to be designed to fit the kit, I also think it would be a real dilemma for potential customers weighing up whether to live with Trumpeter's howler of a mistake on the funnels + use the Pontos details, or correct the funnels + throw away a significant part of the Pontos set.

Given that the kit itself is very expensive, and the Pontos 1/200 scale sets in general are also very expensive, I would venture that customers would prefer the relatively small uplift in cost for a resin replacement aft funnel (3 parts, left half, right half and cap) and the photo-etched parts designed to fit this rather than the mal-formed aft funnel. I suspect people would rather pay $30 more to fix the problem properly and be able to use all the PE they're buying than end up with a visibly deformed Hood still costing >$600 or with mismatching levels of detail on corrected shape funnels.

Thoughts?

_________________
James Duff
Sovereign Hobbies Ltd
http://www.sovereignhobbies.co.uk

Current build:
HMS Imperial D09 1/350
http://www.shipmodels.info/mws_forum/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=167151


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 2:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 12:18 pm
Posts: 2068
Location: Salt Lake City, USA
Pontos, please at least give us duplicate forefunnel PE parts (funnel PE wrap and grille/catwalk) for those of us who will want to modify the aft funnel down to it's proper size; it would be an easy mod for both us "hardcore" modelers and you guys as the parts would only need to be designed once... :puppy_eyes:

_________________
-Jason Channell

Current Project: 1/200 Bismarck


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 1:28 pm
Posts: 303
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Channell wrote:
Pontos, please at least give us duplicate forefunnel PE parts (funnel PE wrap and grille/catwalk) for those of us who will want to modify the aft funnel down to it's proper size; it would be an easy mod for both us "hardcore" modelers and you guys as the parts would only need to be designed once... :puppy_eyes:


I agree with Jason. I personally see 4 options:

1. Place duplicates of both funnels PE pieces in the kit. That way if people swap funnels with somebody else each person will be able to have the Pontos PE on the funnels and they will match, regardless if you have the front or rear funnels.

2. Offer the duplicate funnel PE pieces as a separate item. This way the main kit PE is for the people who want to build the kit straight from the box. Anybody who wants to correct the funnels can buy the separate PE items and fix the issue however they choose.

3. Maybe Model Monkey could make a version of his corrected funnel sans exterior details that the Pontos PE could be put on? This would eliminate the possibility of the PE not matching Steve's designed details. This would also rely on Pontos creating extra front funnel PE and offering it either in the kit or as a separate item.

4. Resin replacement for the rear funnel with correct dimensions. This could also be made without details so the PE will fit on it and match the front funnel.


I personally want my Hood to have the correct size funnels, so I'm really hoping they will make one of these options happen.

_________________
-Nelson
Current Project:
1:200 U.S.S. Arizona
1:350 U.S.S. Chicago SSN-721

Future Projects:
All of them!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 06, 2016 8:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 343
I'm still hoping someone else will take measurements (front to back and width) of their kit funnels as well (to verify and cross check against mine). It would be good to do that so we can positively confirm which funnel is correct.

_________________
Frank Allen
H.M.S. Hood Association
http://www.hmshood.org.uk
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 06, 2016 8:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 343
Pontosmodel wrote:
Well As for the funnel, we have discussed internally,
The main problem is all of the funnel base parts and upper parts of both funnels are all different sizes.
I think a lowest cost way that two owners of this kit can swap each other as one for two fore funnels and the other after.

Image

Thank you
Keumho Kim


The rear splinter shield looks great! Will it also have stiffeners & angles braces? We don't have a very good view of the interior....we have just one photo that shows a small section.

_________________
Frank Allen
H.M.S. Hood Association
http://www.hmshood.org.uk
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 06, 2016 9:10 am 
Offline
PontosModel
PontosModel
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:26 am
Posts: 1002
Location: Korea
These are just for the first fitting.And so we would add some more details.
Image
Image
Thank you
Keumho Kim

_________________
Image
Keumho Kim of Pontosmodel
help@pontosmodel.com
http://pontosmodel.com
Shop: http://hobbydecal.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 07, 2016 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 225
Location: Melbourne Australia
FW_Allen wrote:
I'm still hoping someone else will take measurements (front to back and width) of their kit funnels as well (to verify and cross check against mine). It would be good to do that so we can positively confirm which funnel is correct.


I pulled out my funnels yesterday and dry fitted them together. Yes the fore funnel is larger than the aft funnel. However that also means that the bases of the funnels are also different as is the top funnel ring pieces. More of a problem though is that if the forward funnel, which is the larger of the two, is correct then that sized funnel won't fit on the base superstructure of the aft funnel as it's too deep, (fore to aft). The base of the funnel would have to me modified or the superstructure base, needs to be modified. Sorry I don't have the instructions to call out parts by number at the moment.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 343
Pontosmodel wrote:
Image


Here is the only known photo of the inside of the rear 4" gun splinter shield. As you can see, there are ribs/stiffeners around the interior of the main portion. The short, angled walls at the front appear to have angled supports though (on their forward faces). We do not know how many supports were on each segment...obviously there were at least two.

Those small walls appear to have ended roughly behind the small upright vents just forward of the position (we base this on another onboard photo that shows the area wide open between the vents). We cant see the ends of the walls though, so its hard to tell exact shape and if there are other angled supports, etc.

Attachment:
rearshield.jpg
rearshield.jpg [ 68.43 KiB | Viewed 4183 times ]
Attachment:
rearshields2.jpg
rearshields2.jpg [ 95.22 KiB | Viewed 4183 times ]

_________________
Frank Allen
H.M.S. Hood Association
http://www.hmshood.org.uk
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 343
David Gatt wrote:
FW_Allen wrote:
I'm still hoping someone else will take measurements (front to back and width) of their kit funnels as well (to verify and cross check against mine). It would be good to do that so we can positively confirm which funnel is correct.


I pulled out my funnels yesterday and dry fitted them together. Yes the fore funnel is larger than the aft funnel. However that also means that the bases of the funnels are also different as is the top funnel ring pieces. More of a problem though is that if the forward funnel, which is the larger of the two, is correct then that sized funnel won't fit on the base superstructure of the aft funnel as it's too deep, (fore to aft). The base of the funnel would have to me modified or the superstructure base, needs to be modified. Sorry I don't have the instructions to call out parts by number at the moment.


Many thanks. Were you able to measure the parts though? Just curious to verify my measurements so we can conclusively decide which funnel is more correct in size.

As for making a fore funnel fit atop the rear funnel's deckhouse (for lack of a better term), you are correct. The bottom piece of the fore funnel (part C15) is indeed too long. Of course, one could make it fit by flattening the rear end (straight instead of round) of C15. As I recall, this structure went under the walkway that was around the top front of the Disinfector House aboard the real ship anyway. This would give some degree of flexibility in aligning/centring the funnel fore and aft to the deck house as well (although we'd have to alter the raised bit on the top to better accommodate C15.

_________________
Frank Allen
H.M.S. Hood Association
http://www.hmshood.org.uk
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 8:56 am
Posts: 9
I've posted this thought in "Mighty big problem with Trumpeter Hood":

Hachette produced a 1/200 part-work of the Hood that had two correct size funnels - ones that are the same size as the forward funnel of the Trumpeter Hood - in weeks 137 and 138. These particular weeks can still be bought through websites like eBay.

The Hachette funnels have no surface detail but they could be wrapped in very thin styrene sheet with rivet markings inscribed from the back side or use the etched brass from Pontos if they can be persuaded to produce two of the forward funnel wraps.

I hope that this helps.

Regards,

Robbie


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 2:54 am 
Offline
PontosModel
PontosModel
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:26 am
Posts: 1002
Location: Korea
We have looked over the Funnel parts.
And we decided to try to do following solution as the best way as to use the kit parts.
But there may be some funnel parts need to be modified.
These are C15(base) C6+C7(main funnel) C6+C7 and C4(upper) of fore Funnel.

You need cut and reduce the size horizontally 1.8mm these 4 parts.
After cutting, these will be the same size with C14 C16+17 and C3 of After funnel.

With this process, you can have two same size funnels without getting extra resin parts.
There may be some opinions that after funnel kit is smaller than original plan size.
But I think these are negligible small problems.

We may add these extra PE parts at our Hood advanced set.
The Basic set will have separate fore and after PE parts without cutting process because I think almost modelers will do easy way not cutting.

We have spent much time for this solution already, so there may be no more act for other suggestions. :wave_1:

Thank you
Keumho Kim

_________________
Image
Keumho Kim of Pontosmodel
help@pontosmodel.com
http://pontosmodel.com
Shop: http://hobbydecal.com


Last edited by Pontosmodel on Tue Aug 09, 2016 3:06 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 3:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 225
Location: Melbourne Australia
David Gatt wrote:
FW_Allen wrote:
I'm still hoping someone else will take measurements (front to back and width) of their kit funnels as well (to verify and cross check against mine). It would be good to do that so we can positively confirm which funnel is correct.


I pulled out my funnels yesterday and dry fitted them together. Yes the fore funnel is larger than the aft funnel. However that also means that the bases of the funnels are also different as is the top funnel ring pieces. More of a problem though is that if the forward funnel, which is the larger of the two, is correct then that sized funnel won't fit on the base superstructure of the aft funnel as it's too deep, (fore to aft). The base of the funnel would have to me modified or the superstructure base, needs to be modified. Sorry I don't have the instructions to call out parts by number at the moment.



Yes sorry. The forward funnel measures 38.5 mm the aft funnel measures 36mm. These measurements are taken on the external surface. Just bellow the beveled top ring on which the cap sits.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 580 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 29  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group