The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 4:34 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 7:20 pm
Posts: 924
I've been experimenting with different approaches to flags lately and am always dissatisfied with their toy-like appearance. I tried painting on foil, transferring decals to gel medium skins, the usual foil sandwich thing, partially melting decals, you name it. I figure the reason they look wrong is that there is simply a lack of fine detail in the creases and folds that no material can capture at these scales.

So.... I downloaded some photographs of real flags blowing in the wind, resized them and adjusted their look in photoshop. I printed them off, glued them back to back and added real curves and undulations to add to the faux, photographic distortions. I touched up the sides with a pen and glued them onto the pole with some gel medium. To my eye, things look a lot more realistic than my previous strategies and they photograph really well in the final model shots.
Probably only good for larger ship scales.


Attachments:
File comment: The flag I printed off (photograph of a real flag that's been resized in photoshop and adjusted for contrast.
flag-1.jpg
flag-1.jpg [ 196.76 KiB | Viewed 4786 times ]
File comment: The flag as it appears with additional real curves on the pole.
flag2.jpg
flag2.jpg [ 193.18 KiB | Viewed 4786 times ]
flagone.jpg
flagone.jpg [ 187.09 KiB | Viewed 4765 times ]
flagtwo.jpg
flagtwo.jpg [ 79.07 KiB | Viewed 4765 times ]
grafvonspee.jpg
grafvonspee.jpg [ 40.93 KiB | Viewed 4759 times ]
File comment: The flag on North Carolina done the same way.
mw8.jpg
mw8.jpg [ 181.73 KiB | Viewed 4373 times ]

_________________
Every time the PE sticks to your tweezers, you lose a minute off your life.


Last edited by sargentx on Wed Sep 17, 2014 10:34 am, edited 7 times in total.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Feb 02, 2014 5:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 3:17 pm
Posts: 863
Location: EN83
:thumbs_up_1:

Nice!

Looks much better than the old, thick, foil-sandwich method!

_________________
:no_2: Danny DON'T "waterline"...!


Last edited by RNfanDan on Sun Feb 02, 2014 9:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 1:50 pm
Posts: 1980
I put flag decals on a piece of aluminum foil then trim it out when the decal has well and truly set and dried. Then it can be bent, folded, and mutilated to your heart's desire. :big_grin:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 7:20 pm
Posts: 924
For me at least, No matter how much I can bend and fold a flag....be it on tin foil or any other method , it never seems to have enough micro detail. The photographic detail quadruples the appearance of detail. Give it a try... and it's very low risk with the paper. No cracking decals, multiple shots at the same flag etc.

_________________
Every time the PE sticks to your tweezers, you lose a minute off your life.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 11:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 2:17 am
Posts: 283
Location: _/\/¯¯¯¯¯\/\_ Cape Town
Nice idea :thumbs_up_1: Quick question, once you glued it to position, do you use any medium to make the flag in a pose, or is this just by crunching the paper to get the look you got there going?
Nice idea tho, will definitely refer this method and even use it myself. Thanks ^^)

_________________
Jacques
_________________
Currently working on:
1/350 CVN 65 - Project Enterprise
http://www.shipmodels.info/mws_forum/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=210966


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 1:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 7:20 pm
Posts: 924
thanks....well, its just two pieces of paper glued together with white glue. It has a rubbery quality to it. It's basically just a few simple bends that were done BEFORE attaching it to the pole. It looks way more complex because of the 'wrinkled' flag image. It pretty much held it's s-curve shape on its own. I tried to make bends that relate to the wrinkle os the image.

_________________
Every time the PE sticks to your tweezers, you lose a minute off your life.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 4:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:16 am
Posts: 66
About foil solution : i used to get this method but the decal do not reallly stick to the aluminium and get destroyed in small pieces when adjusting for "wing effect"... is it because my decal was to old or did i forgot something before to add the decal on the foil ? Glue or varnishing stuff ? Thanks for your tips again... :wave_1:

_________________
if you need translation from French instructions...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 6:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 1:06 am
Posts: 972
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Thanks for the tip, Chris! I barely think of flags and decals when building my ships (cause they're all unfinished). Now some ideas to make them look real! I really hope one day you will be back at ship modeling, though...but as a painter myself, I know too that modelling really is time-consuming and will take over your art time.
:thumbs_up_1:
Aop

_________________
On the way:
--1/350 Tamiya DKM Tirpitz Nov 1944

--1/350 scratch-build HMS Lion never built battleship (1938)

And our artworks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:47 am
Posts: 194
Location: East Sussex, England
Nicely realistic looking, you mention best suited to larger scales. Can you say what you have in mind, please.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 8:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:04 pm
Posts: 1808
Location: Paris
Looks like another variant of what is used in those 'photorealistic' kits they sell for railway modellers. My concern would be minimum thickness of the paper you can feed through a printer.

Some of the 'micro-details' mentioned probably could be also achieved by careful shading and highlighting folds and creases, as figure modellers do for representing fabrics.

_________________
Eberhard

Former chairman Arbeitskreis historischer Schiffbau e.V. (German Association for Shipbuilding History)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 1:50 pm
Posts: 1980
I would think the thickness of two paper sheets would be over-scale even in 1/350. I did something similar; a friend wanted a Montreal Canadians (hockey team) pennant for a 1/35 armored vehicle. I down-loaded a suitable pennant and re-sized it. The pennant was about 1/2 inch by 1/4 inch. I made one file with the pennant in proper position, and a second file with the pennant flipped so it was in reverse. Then printed the proper side (when printing a single subject the image prints right in the center of the paper), flipped the sheet of paper making sure it was still right side up, then printed again with the reverse image. I had a pennant printed both sides of the same sheet of paper (one side proper and the other in reverse) and in perfect register. Just had to cut it out. Bit of a waste of printing paper, but it's cheap. And got a nice flag. :wave_1:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 7:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:16 am
Posts: 66
biggles2 wrote:
I put flag decals on a piece of aluminum foil then trim it out when the decal has well and truly set and dried. Then it can be bent, folded, and mutilated to your heart's desire. :big_grin:

I tried this but the decal do not stick to the aluminium foil when "wind or stand" shaped/foiled.. it get out bit by bit.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 8:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 6:01 am
Posts: 409
Location: Ontario Canada
They look great,thanks for the tip. :thumbs_up_1:

Scott

_________________
K494 HMCS Arnprior
Royal Canadian Navy


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 6:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 1:50 pm
Posts: 1980
frenchinamst wrote:
biggles2 wrote:
I put flag decals on a piece of aluminum foil then trim it out when the decal has well and truly set and dried. Then it can be bent, folded, and mutilated to your heart's desire. :big_grin:

I tried this but the decal do not stick to the aluminium foil when "wind or stand" shaped/foiled.. it get out bit by bit.

Forgot to say that I primed the foil first. :whistle:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2016 4:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 9:25 am
Posts: 2256
Location: Los Angeles and Houston
sargentx wrote:
For me at least, No matter how much I can bend and fold a flag....be it on tin foil or any other method , it never seems to have enough micro detail. The photographic detail quadruples the appearance of detail. Give it a try... and it's very low risk with the paper. No cracking decals, multiple shots at the same flag etc.


This is the method we use for 28mm and 15mm miniatures.

It never even occurred to me that it could be used on smaller models.

Although I wonder how easily I can get it to work in 1/700 (I have yet to do any flags for my 1/700 models, as they are supposed to be in fighting trim, and I have been unsure what they would be flying, and where).

But I'll have to remember this method for the 1/700 as well.

MB

_________________
OMG LOOK! A signature

Working on:


1/700 (All Fall 1942):
HIJMS Nagara
HIJMS Aoba & Kinugasa
USS San Francisco
USS Helena
USS St. Louis
USS Laffey & Farenholt
HIJMS Sub-Chasers No. 4 - 7
HIJMS Sub-Chasers No. 13 - 16


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 4:37 pm
Posts: 313
Great for 350 but in 700, typically the flag is too heavy to easily attach to the rigging without pulling. I've agonized over this myself for years.

I use a heavier matte foil that I prime in dark grey, fold over and matte finish. Here are some examples of a few I've done:

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 7:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2017 12:42 pm
Posts: 140
Location: Schaumburg, IL
That looks Great! Thanks for the tip. :thumbs_up_1:
I like that idea of using an actual picture of the flag to get the shadows/highlights.
It the past I have used "bare metal foil"
Placed decal on the foil, cut out and folded the adhesive side together. It is thin enough. But extreme care has to be used.
With as thin as it is, it is very easy to crush beyond use.

_________________
Website - David's Scale Models - https://www.davidsscalemodels.com

Model Albums - https://www.flickr.com/photos/128642409@N05/albums


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 7:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 4:37 pm
Posts: 313
Or just hand paint the whole thing:

[url=https://postimg.org/image/919w0xvfb/]Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group