The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Wed Jul 09, 2025 4:22 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2637 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 ... 132  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 3125
Location: Hawaii
Ahhh, makes sense. Thanks Timm. Might have to add those to some of my Essexes when I decide to build 'em. Awesome Shangri-La btw :thumbs_up_1:

_________________
Drawing Board:
1/700 Whiff USS Leyte and escorts 1984
1/700 Whiff USN Modernized CAs 1984
1/700 Whiff ASW Showdown - FFs vs SSGN 1984

Slipway:
1/700 Whiff USN ASW Hunter Killer Group Dio 1984


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 12:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 12:22 pm
Posts: 2013
Location: Calif
Capt652 wrote:
Hi Cliffy,

The items you ask about are called 'butt straps', steel plates welded to tie the hull sides and main deck to the upper structure. While I don't know what thickness of steel they really are, in 1:350 scale they probably would be close to the thickness of a coat of paint. I made mine out of the thinnest sheet styrene I could find, I think it is .010". I know it's way over scale. I tried a little sanding too. I got the idea from Steve Larsen and after looking closely at pictures of the real ships I followed suite. Like i said, I know it's over scale, but I like the look.

Timm


Interesting... Now is this a late war item? When did they 1st start with the "Butt straps?" I have a couple Essex class CVs to build probably during the early 1944 era.

_________________
If ya lose yer sense of humor...
You've lost everything...

On the Bench:
1/720 Italeri CVN-68 ca 1976/77
1/800 ARii 1/800 CV-59 backdating to 1961 (CVA-59)
1/700Trumpy USS Hornet CV-8 "Doolittle Raiders"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10570
Location: EG48
It was part of the original construction. In actuality the ones above the flight deck were not butt straps. A butt strap is used to join two pieces of hull plating. The taller vertical pieces you see on the "hull" between the main (I.E. Hangar) deck and the flight deck were part of the flight deck foundation girders (For those of you with the AOTS Intrepid book turn to the shell diagram on page 54; the butt straps are item 4 and the girders are item 3.. you should be able to see the difference. Also check out drawing B6 on page 56.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:40 pm
Posts: 1157
Location: New Jersey
I have the Trumpeter 1/350 Essex kit that I'd really like to build as Wasp since it seems nobody else models Wasp.

Even though it was roughly 250 nm from Halsey's flagship NJ during Typhoon Cobra, I'd like to build Wasp at the same time and put it next to my NJ/Spence Diorama. This would be 12/17/44 roughly.

I am attempting to order plans from Floating Drydock, but I'm a bit overwhelmed. There is one set of plans there for was from the "Navy" series, however I don't know if these will be what I need. Could anybody shed some light on this, or perhaps notify me of a similar ship to Wasp so I can buy those plans instead.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 12:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10570
Location: EG48
In your case the Essex kit is a good start as Wasp didn't receive many improvements until near the end of the war. Probably anything out of the Floating Drydock BU Series from '43-44 for Essex, Hornet, or Franklin will be applicable, but I can go through my notes and look at what you need to change.

As far as air group goes (assuming you're not stowing it inside to ride out the storm :wink: ), this is what Wasp was reported to have aboard on December 12:

VF-81 F6F-3 x 13 (tricolor)
VF-81 F6F-3N x 1 (tricolor)
VF-81 F6F-3P x 1 (tricolor)
VF-81 F6F-5 x 36 (Glossy Sea Blue)
VF-81 F6F-5N x 3 (Glossy Sea Blue)
VB-81 SB2C/SBW-3 x 21 (probably tricolor)
VT-81 TBM-1C x 18 (probably tricolor)

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:40 pm
Posts: 1157
Location: New Jersey
Tracy White wrote:
In your case the Essex kit is a good start as Wasp didn't receive many improvements until near the end of the war. Probably anything out of the Floating Drydock BU Series from '43-44 for Essex, Hornet, or Franklin will be applicable, but I can go through my notes and look at what you need to change.

As far as air group goes (assuming you're not stowing it inside to ride out the storm :wink: ), this is what Wasp was reported to have aboard on December 12:

VF-81 F6F-3 x 13 (tricolor)
VF-81 F6F-3N x 1 (tricolor)
VF-81 F6F-3P x 1 (tricolor)
VF-81 F6F-5 x 36 (Glossy Sea Blue)
VF-81 F6F-5N x 3 (Glossy Sea Blue)
VB-81 SB2C/SBW-3 x 21 (probably tricolor)
VT-81 TBM-1C x 18 (probably tricolor)


Thanks Tracy! This build will probably not have any planes on deck. I think Wasp had a slightly different radar layout from the other early Essex, and that was the primary way of differentiating, though I could be wrong. I'd like to make sure before I go all out. As of right now I've just assembled the two hull halves and added PE watertight doors to the whole island (I can probably safely add PE ladders to the island as well before I really have to start being concerned about accuracy.)

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 8:37 am
Posts: 142
drdoom1337 wrote:
I have the Trumpeter 1/350 Essex kit that I'd really like to build as Wasp since it seems nobody else models Wasp.


I know one build of CV-18. :) This website can be helpful to you:

USS Wasp - 1 2 3


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:40 pm
Posts: 1157
Location: New Jersey
That Wasp build is highly inspirational! :thumbs_up_1:

I've begun building my Essex/Wasp kit (put my Singapore diorama on stall since I need quite a bit of extras for Repulse). I've run into some problems that perhaps somebody could shed light on.

The fit of both hull halves was extremely poor. After countless amounts of sanding , and nearly an entire tube of squadron green putty, I'm ALMOST at a nice smooth surface with no seams. The flight deck is a different story. I'd like to know what is the best way to eliminate the three seams on the flight deck without destroying too much detail. I've considered buying the wooden deck conversion from Nautilus Models, however it seems like that deck would have seams as well. Has anybody figurered out a simple way to join the three parts seamlessly?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 5:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10570
Location: EG48
Whack off the locating tabs... see if this might be of help.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 5:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:57 am
Posts: 237
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia
drdoom1337 wrote:
I'd like to know what is the best way to eliminate the three seams on the flight deck without destroying too much detail. I've considered buying the wooden deck conversion from Nautilus Models, however it seems like that deck would have seams as well. Has anybody figurered out a simple way to join the three parts seamlessly?

The series of photos at this link might help. I was able to make the seams disappear almost entirely without the use of filler and without harming the surface detail at all. Note that step 1 is removing the alignment tabs...

http://picasaweb.google.com/ARP1757/CV1 ... 5157542466

_________________
Andrew P, PBFHS
Chesapeake, Virginia
www.PBFHS.org


Last edited by AndrexP on Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:40 pm
Posts: 1157
Location: New Jersey
I'm still a bit perplexed about ordering plans. I'm looking at the Floating Drydock site as I type and I notice that there are many different types of plans instead of one overall bundling. In essence, should I buy a set of:
Hull Lines
Flight deck
Gallery deck
Bridges and Platforms?

I want to make sure I get everything right the first time I order
(I hate forgetting things when I order!) :thumbs_up_1:

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 6:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 5:59 pm
Posts: 404
Location: NW Lower Michigan
dr doom,

As far as the two fight deck seams, like what Tracy stated, cut off the locating tabs. The tabs try to make the flight hump/buckle. Clamp the flight deck upside down onto a flat surface making sure the seams are tight together and glue the seams from the under side. After the glue is dry and and some point before paint, carefully tape on both sides of the glued joint with masking tape to protect the flight deck molded in details and fill with Squadron (or your favorite) putty. The gap/space between the masking tape was probably 1/16" or less. I then immediately pulled off the masking tape and then let the putty dry. I used a #11 blade to carefully scrape the excess off.

Hope that helps!

Timm

_________________
Timm Smith
Learn something new about the ship or your job every day. Ignorance is not bliss aboard a warship in wartime. Ignorance could cost the life of yourself, a shipmate, or the loss of the ship.
- Personal Information Booklet CV- 38


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10570
Location: EG48
drdoom1337 wrote:
Hull Lines


Only if you're planning on scratchbuilding the hull.
Your mileage may vary on the rest.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:40 pm
Posts: 1157
Location: New Jersey
Aside from Wasp, I'd like to build a 1944 Lexington. Does anybody know which short hull kit would be most suitablef or this? I'm going to assume the discontinued Yorktown kit but I may be wrong?

Jon

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10570
Location: EG48
1/350th scale?

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 8:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:40 pm
Posts: 1157
Location: New Jersey
Tracy White wrote:
1/350th scale?

Yes, I know Dragon has a 1/700 Lexington but 1/700 just isn't my thing when it comes to carriers (the planes are too small to work with for me)

Also, I'm hoping somebody could come to my rescue. I left my glue tube open and apparently it all dripped onto part e26 of the Trumpeter Essex, completely melting it. If anybody has this piece as a spare (it's a quad 40 mount / platform right above the bridge).

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 8:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10570
Location: EG48
Either the '44 Yorktown CV-10 or CV-13 kit will work, albeit the CV-13 kit is a slightly better start.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 12:34 am
Posts: 28
Location: France
Hello Hill,

I suppose you saw this photo but just in case:
http://www.navsource.org/archives/02/021904.jpg

The shape of the platform and of the elevator is different from the Oriskany's ones.

Best regards,

domi13


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 5:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 2:07 pm
Posts: 109
I'm going to do the Lex as configured on the day of the first strikes on Tokyo.

The 1:700 DML kit is set up for the Lex as configured after the last refit in 1945; i.e. with changes to the island, twin 20mm mounts, .50 caliber quad mounts, etc.

It appears the the DML Hornet CV-12 kit may have all the correct bits, in particular the "F" sprue with the island 20mm galleries not present in the Lex kit - to do the Lex as i want it.

Any guidance from the experts will be appreciated !

[ I'm doing 4 Lexingtons - 2 CV-2's and 2 CV-16's ]

( ON EDIT 12/1/09: the Hornet kit has a single cat, so that's out - looks like a scratch of the 20mm galleries for the island on the LEX kit will be the easiest approach )

Any info on the number and locations of the 20 mm galleries as of Feb. '45 ?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 9:06 pm 
Hello, I was watching the Military Channel the other evening; I believe World at War: 'Pacific' and saw a picture of the Yorktown CV-10, I think quoted as the 'Turkey Shoot' campaign. This film showed Yorktown's forward numerals black on a relatively dark deck, but inverted. (to be viewed from the front). She appeared to be in 33-10a. The film was not reversed as is so often the case. I have never come across any literature in my readings that stated such. Is this just something I was unaware of or is this a sumwhat rare find? (proof). I know Yorktown's first camo period is a little vague so I thought I'd ask the experts. Thanks Keith Hufnagel


Top
  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2637 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 ... 132  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group