The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Thu Jul 24, 2025 10:21 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2637 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 ... 132  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:02 am
Posts: 50
Location: cedar hill, mo
Tracy White wrote:
I don't think they would have been protected by bollards but otherwise I agree with Steve. I suspect that *originally* they were to be within lockers, but experiences such as CV-2 Lexington's at Coral Sea changed things. For what it's worth, I came across a textual document today that ordered the removal of such lockers from CVL hangar decks. Dated mid to late 1943, no reason given.


nice! :thumbs_up_1: thanks for that info. i guese the guy that made the diagrams in the AOTS went with the original idea since it still shows lockers. i think #3 on the diagram that i posted above.

steve: My guess is that the fueling equipment was actually a fueling station composed of piping, valves and a hose similar, if not identical, to the fueling stations found on the gallery deck catwalks.

any pics of this area? or else where exactly are they on the ships so i can scour my referance pics to look for them? i know that in 1/700 it won't be really anywhere near acurately visible but i would like to get them a little better than the blobs of platic that represent them right now.

_________________
i love it when a plan comes together

it's better to be loved for what you are then to be hated for what you're not


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 1:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10570
Location: EG48
raser13 wrote:
nice! :thumbs_up_1: thanks for that info. i guese the guy that made the diagrams in the AOTS went with the original idea since it still shows lockers.


Keep in mind this is educated guesswork on our part; he may be right and us wrong.

raser13 wrote:
any pics of this area? or else where exactly are they on the ships so i can scour my referance pics to look for them? i know that in 1/700 it won't be really anywhere near acurately visible but i would like to get them a little better than the blobs of platic that represent them right now.


AOTS Intrepid, Page 80, G6.
USS Hornet - Damage to Ship's Structure. Memo dated 15 June 1945; left and center picture, top row, center picture, bottom row.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 5:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 743
Location: Northants, UK
Alright

I have a 1/350 Yorktown ready to go. Would i be better gluing the 3 deck sections together early on. I think thats whats been happening aroung here. I'm uncertain as in the past when building the trumpy essexes i've had fit problems around the forward elevator well. I ended up removing the molded tab on the unside of the deck around the well.

I would appreciate any advice on 'not screwing up' if i was to assemble the deck together.

TIA


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 11:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10570
Location: EG48
My advice on the deck:
Assemble it first before mating it to the hull. Essentially treat it the same way I did my Lexington CV-2 Deck. I'd shave off most of the alignment lines personally

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 743
Location: Northants, UK
Ok Tracy. Then all the details that go on the underside of the overhangs can be marked out inaccordance with the hull sides (after test fitting)?

Once these are in place they will lock the deck into its final position

Does this make sense ?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:46 pm 
Offline
Model Monkey
Model Monkey

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 4057
Location: USA
Tracy White wrote:
AOTS Intrepid, Page 80, G6.
USS Hornet - Damage to Ship's Structure. Memo dated 15 June 1945; left and center picture, top row, center picture, bottom row.


The two large cylinders appear to be filters, a very, very necessary component of any fuel system.

Tracy White wrote:
My advice on the deck:
Assemble it first before mating it to the hull. Essentially treat it the same way I did my Lexington CV-2 Deck. I'd shave off most of the alignment lines personally


simon b wrote:
Ok Tracy. Then all the details that go on the underside of the overhangs can be marked out in accordance with the hull sides (after test fitting)?...Does this make sense ?


Perfect sense. Tracy's technique worked well for my Yorktown. The detail I added to the hull sides showed me exactly where the flight deck overhang underside girders and other details needed to go.

_________________
Have fun, Monkey around.™

-Steve L.

Complete catalog: - https://www.model-monkey.com/
Follow Model Monkey® on Facebook: - https://www.facebook.com/modelmonkeybookandhobby


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 1:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 743
Location: Northants, UK
Cool. I will be starting soon but after seeing all the details done by everyone else i got a little overwhelmed thinking about the sequence of working etc etc

I'm pieceing it together bit by bit :big_grin:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 1:55 pm 
Offline
Model Monkey
Model Monkey

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 4057
Location: USA
No worries, the best way to eat an elephant is one bite at a time. It just takes a while.

I hope to get mine done in time for the IPMS Nationals. That is looking less and less likely.

Although a lot of work to build, Trumpy's 1/350 Essex kits are far better than their very inaccurately shaped 1/350 Hornet CV-8. For the next project I'd like to tackle a mostly scratch 1/350 USS Enterprise CV-6 at Midway as a companion to Dragon's superb 1/350 Buchanan (Tim Dike rocks). I think it will probably be much easier to scratch-build most of the Hornet kit as Enterprise than try to correct the kit's hull and flight deck inaccuracies.

*Edit by Tracy* Spelling Correction

_________________
Have fun, Monkey around.™

-Steve L.

Complete catalog: - https://www.model-monkey.com/
Follow Model Monkey® on Facebook: - https://www.facebook.com/modelmonkeybookandhobby


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 2:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 743
Location: Northants, UK
Sounds good steve

I've noticed a slight twist in the yorktowns hull. When i drop the hanger decks in place the join is slightly wider one side (not by much though)
Not sure if its best to secue the hull and glue the deck in place before adding the waterline plate of to just fill the gap and leave as is.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:02 am
Posts: 50
Location: cedar hill, mo
thanks once again for the input guys, i trust your guys educated gueses over most things on these ships. i missed the diagram on page 80 of the AOTS when i flipped through looking for them. and i didn't know what i was lookin at when i was looking at pics of the ship. i'll probably mock up two tubes like that and use some tin wire or sewing thread stiffened with glue to simulate the hoses. i like that idea better than a box of platic to be a locker anyhow. plus the build up of volitol jet fuel fumes in a locker don't make much sence to me either.

_________________
i love it when a plan comes together

it's better to be loved for what you are then to be hated for what you're not


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 11:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:02 am
Posts: 50
Location: cedar hill, mo
o.k. a while ago some one posted a link to a ship that some one did where they did the display in a clear plexi box as if the ship was on the water, and then an underwater sceen below(sorry i couldn't find the post/link when i quikly scanned the last few pages). well i went to the local hobby shop and found this clear plastic that pretty well replicates a rolling sea.

Image

the only problem is that the ship happens to be a smidge longer than the plastic sheet.

Image

so i got 2 of them. the question i have is, have any of you worked with this stuff before? if so what would you use to glue the two sheets together? super glue/CA and testors model glue turn it white. not good. and elmers white glue, while it does dry clear and look like the waves, it doesn't hold them together well enough. any sugestions?

_________________
i love it when a plan comes together

it's better to be loved for what you are then to be hated for what you're not


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 4:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10570
Location: EG48
I'd look into epoxy or maybe using acrylic gel medium.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Posts: 12334
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Since you plan on using the wavy surface as the top of a box, perhaps it won't be necessary to join the two wave surfaces to each other - it might be enough to just join each of them to the top of the sides of the box.

_________________
De quoi s'agit-il?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 11:04 am
Posts: 29
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Questions, questions, questions...

My new question: how works the paravane or more precisely the paravane track?

Looking the photos and drawings I don't understand, how can the paravane moved to the side? The track goes under the "boxy structure" and the paravane stoved vertically. In this postion the paravane can not be moved under the edge of the "boxy structure" because of its length. It's seems to me that the paravane is between the bulkhead and the track.

I have found only one possible solution: the paravane have to rotate into a horizontal position and so can be moved under the edge. There is a pulley on the drawing, maybe it can be use for this purpose. What do you think?

I will continue it in the next post because I can attach only three photos...


Attachments:
File comment: Drawing from the AOTS showing the paravane with tail upwards.
paravane_track_drawing.jpg
paravane_track_drawing.jpg [ 44.86 KiB | Viewed 1127 times ]
File comment: Part of the photo of Essex from Raven's book, page 20. The paravane is with tail upwards, too.
paravane_track_CV-9_a.jpg
paravane_track_CV-9_a.jpg [ 36.81 KiB | Viewed 1149 times ]
File comment: Part of the photo from Camouflage 2 (Yorktown)
paravane_track_CV-10.jpg
paravane_track_CV-10.jpg [ 33.22 KiB | Viewed 1127 times ]

_________________
Sorry for my poor English!


Last edited by Essex on Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 11:04 am
Posts: 29
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Paravane, part two...

At first some quotes...

From the page 39:

(There is a very good photo of Hancock by Tracy showing the paravane track.)

Capt652 wrote:
Would you happen to know if that paravane track continues under the flight deck and along the port side as well?


Tracy White wrote:
That said, I don't know that the rail went completely under the flight deck or what track it would have taken, but I would imagine that it did to facilitate moving Paravanes around.


From the page 75:

Steve Larsen wrote:
The two paravanes go on the forecastle mounted on the bulkhead outboard of the light labyrinths. According to AOTS mount them nose up.


I think the rail don't went from one side to the other. There are some objects that block the way, e.g. the light labyrinths and there is an inclined ladder too, see the AOTS drawing A7/2. It can be seen on the attached photo of Essex how the track ends.

It is interesting that at some ships this paravane track is positioned higher and goes around the "boxy structure" instead of under it!

About the sources: the mentioned Warship International No. 4 / 1999 is a special edition about the Essex class carriers.


Attachments:
File comment: Part of a photo from the Warship International: Essex on April 15, 1944, official USN photograph 19-N-79141. Note the end of the paravane track and the paravane is with tail downwards. The inclined ladder can be seen as well.
paravane_track_CV-9_b.jpg
paravane_track_CV-9_b.jpg [ 35.34 KiB | Viewed 1766 times ]
File comment: Part of the photo of Antietam from the Warships International, official USN photo 19-N-89571. The paravane track is around the "boxy structure".
paravane_track_CV-36.jpg
paravane_track_CV-36.jpg [ 41.74 KiB | Viewed 1268 times ]
File comment: The situation is similar at the Ticonderoga (part of the photo from Warship Pictorial #22). Note the lower edge the of the "boxy structure" at the front bulkhead!
paravane_track_CV-14.jpg
paravane_track_CV-14.jpg [ 30.32 KiB | Viewed 1769 times ]

_________________
Sorry for my poor English!
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Hanger deck color
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 1:19 pm
Posts: 28
What is the proper color for the hanger deck on the Essex in '43?
Thanks
Winks

_________________
Any storm in a port.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 8:36 pm 
Offline
Model Monkey
Model Monkey

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 4057
Location: USA
Essex wrote:
how works the paravane or more precisely the paravane track?


The paravane track was used to move the very heavy paravane from its stowed position to it's launch position under the bulkhead davit. After use, it was then used to move the paravane back to its stowed position.

Winks wrote:
What is the proper color for the hanger deck on the Essex in '43?


Deck gray.

_________________
Have fun, Monkey around.™

-Steve L.

Complete catalog: - https://www.model-monkey.com/
Follow Model Monkey® on Facebook: - https://www.facebook.com/modelmonkeybookandhobby


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 4:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 11:04 am
Posts: 29
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Steve Larsen wrote:
Essex wrote:
how works the paravane or more precisely the paravane track?


The paravane track was used to move the very heavy paravane from its stowed position to it's launch position under the bulkhead davit. After use, it was then used to move the paravane back to its stowed position.


It was self-evident for me :big_grin: but I don't know how can the paravane be moved along this track? How much does the paravane weigh?

_________________
Sorry for my poor English!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:39 am 
Offline
Model Monkey
Model Monkey

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 4057
Location: USA
Essex wrote:
How much does the paravane weigh?


Remember that the paravane itself is merely a large, winged, weight that pulls a cable away from the hull using the ship's bow energy wave to swing the cable clear of the ship. It is the cable that clears mines, not the paravane. Several hundred feet of cable is very heavy therefore the paravane must be heavy enough to act on the cable. Also, the paravane has to remain submerged in order for it to "swim" properly.

There are a few paravanes at the USS North Carolina Museum, two on deck and one off ship. I remember trying to lift the one off ship. It was merely resting on a cradle under its own weight. I am certain it would take several men to move one even with the aid of mechanical help.

I can't tell you exactly how heavy one is. The best answer I can give you is that a paravane is heavy enough to require an overhead steel track to safely move it around a carrier's forecastle.

Essex wrote:
how can the paravane be moved along this track?


There is a steel harness welded to the body with attachment rings. I am certain these rings were used to attach tackle to the paravane for lifting and towing purposes.

There are similar tracks in the hangar deck on the overhead and below decks near the machinery shops and magazines, at least on the modernized Yorktown as she now appears on Charleston, used to lift heavy equipment, bombs, torpedoes, aircraft engines, etc. They are basically large, steel I-beams. On these tracks is a dolly with four steel wheels that run along the I-beam fillet. IIRC, the dolly had one or two lifting points to attach tackle.

I wouldn't be surprised to learn that men lost fingers moving that dolly along a track on a ship that pitched and rolled.

_________________
Have fun, Monkey around.™

-Steve L.

Complete catalog: - https://www.model-monkey.com/
Follow Model Monkey® on Facebook: - https://www.facebook.com/modelmonkeybookandhobby


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 8:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 5:59 pm
Posts: 404
Location: NW Lower Michigan
Thanks Steve for the explanation on how a paravane worked. There were also left and right handed paravanes. In the reports of the shake-down on Shangri-la there are comments as to a paravane being 'installed' on the opposite (wrong) side and when deployed it continually steered the wrong direction and slammed into the ship's hull!

Capt652

PS. Steve, fantastic job on your CV-10 hanger deck!!

_________________
Timm Smith
Learn something new about the ship or your job every day. Ignorance is not bliss aboard a warship in wartime. Ignorance could cost the life of yourself, a shipmate, or the loss of the ship.
- Personal Information Booklet CV- 38


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2637 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 ... 132  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group