The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 5:26 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 782 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 ... 40  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 6:53 am 
Hi

I recently lost the building plans to my 1:350 Mini hobby kit CVN-65 Enterprise. Can anyone help me with that. I now cant build it and its killing me.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2015 10:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:10 am
Posts: 2695
Location: san francisco
O.K My fellow BigE modelers. I heard that 1/350 hull is not correct. When place it side by side to the J.F.K. it seems fine. But I look at stern and Enterprise fantail is huge compare to J.F.K. Something not right about that. Tell me I'm wrong about this.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 31, 2015 4:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 6:19 pm
Posts: 82
Location: Davenport, WA
The lower hull at the stern should match the JFK, with the much deeper V shape. The only thing wrong with the JFK is the keel skeg should not be squared off at the back end, but come to an edge. The Tamiya Enterprise is MUCH worse in this regard.

When I first reported on the Enterprise in 1986, I got sent down into the drydock to work on the Hull Decon crew. I actually took the Tamiya hull down into the dock. I was so disappointed by how off the stern was. Above the main (Hangar) deck I don't know for sure if the Enterprise was a bit wider or not. The rest of the Tamiya hull is OK excepting the bilge keels being overdone. The bulb at the bow on Enterprise does protrude forward of the waterline cutwater, But Tamiya overdid it. (Enterprise was unique with the protruding bow until Reagan). Shafts 2 and 3, the inboard ones, are missing external shaft bearings. I've stood on them sampling the paint, they are there.

All the Supercarriers, from Forrestal on, used the same basic hull design. All 8 conventional ships were/are 990 feet between perpendiculars. When the Enterprise was built, it was felt that the JP-5 and Navy distillate bunkerage should be increased to reflect the Ships increased endurance, so the Forrestal hull design was lengthened 50 feet to 1040 between PP, and the waterline beam was increased 5 feet. With Nimitz they added another foot to the beam for even more JP-5 storage.
All this information can be found in Friedman's US Carrier volume

_________________
Building:
1/350 BWN California 1941, model monkey parts
1/350 Trumpy North Carolina with WEM, GMM, Lion Roar,
and Very Fire PE, Model Monkey parts
1/350 Fujimi Shokaku


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 31, 2015 5:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:10 am
Posts: 2695
Location: san francisco
Thank You that really explains the reason. I am not going to toss it away because of it. I just got to make up my mind to waterline or full hull.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 9:20 am
Posts: 438
Edward Wilson wrote:
The lower hull at the stern should match the JFK, with the much deeper V shape. The only thing wrong with the JFK is the keel skeg should not be squared off at the back end, but come to an edge. The Tamiya Enterprise is MUCH worse in this regard.

When I first reported on the Enterprise in 1986, I got sent down into the drydock to work on the Hull Decon crew. I actually took the Tamiya hull down into the dock. I was so disappointed by how off the stern was. Above the main (Hangar) deck I don't know for sure if the Enterprise was a bit wider or not. The rest of the Tamiya hull is OK excepting the bilge keels being overdone. The bulb at the bow on Enterprise does protrude forward of the waterline cutwater, But Tamiya overdid it. (Enterprise was unique with the protruding bow until Reagan). Shafts 2 and 3, the inboard ones, are missing external shaft bearings. I've stood on them sampling the paint, they are there.

All the Supercarriers, from Forrestal on, used the same basic hull design. All 8 conventional ships were/are 990 feet between perpendiculars. When the Enterprise was built, it was felt that the JP-5 and Navy distillate bunkerage should be increased to reflect the Ships increased endurance, so the Forrestal hull design was lengthened 50 feet to 1040 between PP, and the waterline beam was increased 5 feet. With Nimitz they added another foot to the beam for even more JP-5 storage.
All this information can be found in Friedman's US Carrier volume


Terrific information. Is there anything that can be done to correct the Enterprise Hull?

What is the difference of a strut bearing and an external shaft bearing? Perhaps one and the same?

_________________
http://www.f-16.net
http://www.c-130.net

Building:
1/48 Lancaster (HK)
1/350 Akagi
1/350 IJN Kongo


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 10:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 13
Jon wrote:
What is the difference of a strut bearing and an external shaft bearing? Perhaps one and the same?


Strut bearings are the bulges at the bottom of a strut, wear the shaft passes through. Shaft bearings are where the shaft exits the hull.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2015 12:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 6:19 pm
Posts: 82
Location: Davenport, WA
We used to call all the Bearings, Internal and external, on the Shafts "Shaft Bearings" :thumbs_up_1:, and on a side note, #1 shaft on the Enterprise is still the longest propeller shaft in the world at 720 feet!

I'm stalled on my Tamiya Enterprise because of the aft hull. I am planning on cutting off the last 6 or 8 inches of the hull below the waterline, gluing in bulkheads based on an old set of plans I got from Floating Drydock years ago. The hull lines are actually pretty close on these. Then skin it with styrene, putty, sand, repeat, then repeat some more.

_________________
Building:
1/350 BWN California 1941, model monkey parts
1/350 Trumpy North Carolina with WEM, GMM, Lion Roar,
and Very Fire PE, Model Monkey parts
1/350 Fujimi Shokaku


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Sep 05, 2015 7:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 7:30 pm
Posts: 1585
Location: Cape Canaveral Florida
I pre-ordered the 1/700 Dragon Enterprise. Since I got charged, I assume that it is really showing up this time. Any news on when?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Sep 05, 2015 7:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:10 am
Posts: 2695
Location: san francisco
Edward Wilson wrote:
We used to call all the Bearings, Internal and external, on the Shafts "Shaft Bearings" :thumbs_up_1:, and on a side note, #1 shaft on the Enterprise is still the longest propeller shaft in the world at 720 feet!

I'm stalled on my Tamiya Enterprise because of the aft hull. I am planning on cutting off the last 6 or 8 inches of the hull below the waterline, gluing in bulkheads based on an old set of plans I got from Floating Drydock years ago. The hull lines are actually pretty close on these. Then skin it with styrene, putty, sand, repeat, then repeat some more.

Could you show me how that is done to hull.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Sep 05, 2015 8:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Posts: 12144
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Mark McKinnis wrote:
I pre-ordered the 1/700 Dragon Enterprise. Since I got charged, I assume that it is really showing up this time. Any news on when?


Mind saying from whom you placed the pre-order?

_________________
De quoi s'agit-il?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2015 4:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 7:30 pm
Posts: 1585
Location: Cape Canaveral Florida
Hi Timmy,

I placed the order with Freetime Hobbies. They don't normally charge you on the Pre-Order without a delivery date in mind. It can be a ways out. It seems like the Dragon kit has been a promise for a couple of years now.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 11:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:18 am
Posts: 195
Does anyone have a definitive list of items that need to be changed in order to backdate the Tamiya E to a pre 80 refit design? I'm working on a 3d printed Island and should have it ready to go in a couple of weeks. (below is a crude mockup of the beehive I did to check the dimensions/shape. The worst part of the island turns out to be the damn windows! hah! Anyway, changes I know need to be made to get to a cuban missile crisis E are:

1. Island to beehive configuration.
2. Antenna arrangement (Depending on specific era)
3. Removal of port-fore CWIS sponson
4. Remove/alter port-aft CIWS sponson
5. Remove Starboard-fore weapons sponson.
6. Cat shuttle on port side
7. Exterior hangar doors are sliding solid affairs not corrugated as in kit
8?

I'm sure there are many other items....

Any help would be greatly appreciated (i'll update this post to keep the list complete.

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Sep 23, 2015 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 11:16 pm
Posts: 66
Location: Philadelphia, Pa.
Are there any oiler markings on the port side of the ship or is all refueling/unrep done on the starboard side?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 24, 2015 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:37 am
Posts: 365
Location: Idaho
I have looked through all the photos that I have acquired of Enterprise over the last 3 years or so and I haven't found any with "oiler" markings on the port side so far. Not saying that there have never been any, I'm just not seeing any in the photos that I have on hand, which is quite a few. I have also done some research on this and have found that US aircraft carrier refueling/unrep is done solely on the starboard side of the ship. Maybe one of our Navy servicemen could provide more information, but just thought I would provide what I had come across so far in my research.

_________________
Doug

Currently building:
Tamiya 1/350 CVN-65 USS Enterprise 2001
http://www.shipmodels.info/mws_forum/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=120496

http://modelshipgallery.com/gallery/use ... index.html


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Oct 03, 2015 8:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:18 am
Posts: 195
Getting Closer to being able to 3D print this.... Need to finish the flag bridge and then detail the Beehive...

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Oct 03, 2015 10:24 pm 
Offline
Model Monkey
Model Monkey

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 3954
Location: USA
Not_so_COB wrote:
Getting Closer to being able to 3D print this.... Need to finish the flag bridge and then detail the Beehive...

Looks great! Many have been asking for this for a long time.

_________________
Have fun, Monkey around.™

-Steve L.

Complete catalog: - https://www.model-monkey.com/
Follow Model Monkey® on Facebook: - https://www.facebook.com/modelmonkeybookandhobby


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 4:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 743
Location: Northants, UK
Would you be offering this in a stripped down form like the CAD picture shows ? I would love something like this but I'd add the extra details myself.
I've had some fantastic 3D printed items but there are limitations. I'd like to clean up the basic structures before detailing.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 8:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:18 am
Posts: 195
Thats how I plan to offer it.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 12:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 11:16 pm
Posts: 66
Location: Philadelphia, Pa.
DWD wrote:
I have looked through all the photos that I have acquired of Enterprise over the last 3 years or so and I haven't found any with "oiler" markings on the port side so far. Not saying that there have never been any, I'm just not seeing any in the photos that I have on hand, which is quite a few. I have also done some research on this and have found that US aircraft carrier refueling/unrep is done solely on the starboard side of the ship. Maybe one of our Navy servicemen could provide more information, but just thought I would provide what I had come across so far in my research.


Thank you!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 5:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:11 am
Posts: 8
Location: Manila, Philippines
Hi guys! Can anybody tell me the answer to the following?

1. When did the Big E started getting into the LowViz config (such as the bow number)?
2. When did they phase in the F18 to replace the A7's?

Thanks for the info.

Noel

_________________
Chapter Contact
IPMS Manila
Philippines
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 782 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 ... 40  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 110 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group