The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Sat Dec 15, 2018 4:28 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 314 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 2:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:06 am
Posts: 2173
Location: Vancouver, Canada
SeanF wrote:

I always thought that was an odd listing, Colorado not being at Pearl on 12/7 and all.


Sean,

Here's the listing for the Midship Models USS Colorado 1941. It clearly says 1941 on the box.

Ebay listing: USS Colorado 1941 (Midship Models)

Yes my options are limited- I probably might have to stick to reshaping the bulge of another Trumpeter Maryland 1941 kit to depict her in Feb. to June 1942 fit. I used my previous Trumpeter Maryland 1941 kit to make Colorado 1942, but I felt I could have done a better job of emulating your instructions.

_________________
"Haijun" means "navy" in Mandarin Chinese.

"You have enemies? Good. It means you stood up for something in your life."- Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 8:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 10:28 pm
Posts: 577
Location: Downey, California
Sorry, I meant that the Trumpeter listing of a 1941 Colorado was what I found odd. I knew the Midship one was '41 fit.

Really makes me wonder why there are so many incidents of USN bulges being done with this same wrong interpretation. Loose Cannon's, HP's, and Trumpeter's Colorado/Maryland, Trumpeter's 350th New York & Texas, and Niko's Florida come to mind. Arizona, on the other hand, never gets presented that way in plastic.

- Sean F.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2017 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 6456
Location: In the hills of North Jersey
Tennessee off the coast of California, December 1943.
Attachment:
80G214100.jpg
80G214100.jpg [ 145.11 KiB | Viewed 824 times ]

_________________
Martin

"Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." John Wayne

Ship Model Gallery


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2017 1:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2017 10:20 am
Posts: 72
Location: Lompoc, California
Wow, I thought I had posted my images for my completed 1/700 Uss California. I know its not perfect, and not a 100% true backdate from 1945 to 1944, but its close enough for me. Plans are to put it in a Dio with a tamiya 1/700 Uss Cushing converted to a uss Sigourney DD-643.


Was also left over with a bunch of parts for the Colorado class as well.


Attachments:
california.jpg
california.jpg [ 23.93 KiB | Viewed 746 times ]
california2.jpg
california2.jpg [ 40.03 KiB | Viewed 746 times ]
california3.jpg
california3.jpg [ 38.81 KiB | Viewed 746 times ]
california4.jpg
california4.jpg [ 30.97 KiB | Viewed 746 times ]
california5.jpg
california5.jpg [ 40.56 KiB | Viewed 746 times ]
california6.jpg
california6.jpg [ 34.9 KiB | Viewed 746 times ]
california7.jpg
california7.jpg [ 26.87 KiB | Viewed 746 times ]
california8.jpg
california8.jpg [ 28.5 KiB | Viewed 746 times ]
california9.jpg
california9.jpg [ 41.98 KiB | Viewed 746 times ]

_________________
Complete:
1/700 USS California BB-44 (Trumpeter)
1/700 USS South Dakota BB-57 (Trumpeter)

in progress:
1/700 USS Montana BB-67
1/700 USS Houston CL-81

Waiting Drydock
1/700 USS Guam CB-2
1/700 Sigourney DD-643
1/700 USS South Dakota BB-49
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2017 4:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 7:30 pm
Posts: 1396
Location: Cape Canaveral Florida
Hi Betelguese90,

I think that your California looks great!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2017 10:20 am
Posts: 72
Location: Lompoc, California
Mark McKinnis wrote:
Hi Betelguese90,

I think that your California looks great!



Thanks! I am happy with how it turned out

_________________
Complete:
1/700 USS California BB-44 (Trumpeter)
1/700 USS South Dakota BB-57 (Trumpeter)

in progress:
1/700 USS Montana BB-67
1/700 USS Houston CL-81

Waiting Drydock
1/700 USS Guam CB-2
1/700 Sigourney DD-643
1/700 USS South Dakota BB-49


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2017 10:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:12 pm
Posts: 1988
I'm kitbashing about 16 Revell 1/429 scale USS Arizonas into the US navy's OBBs(Old Battleships) including the California late war period. download/file.php?id=101074&mode=view
viewtopic.php?f=59&t=165105


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2017 4:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2017 10:20 am
Posts: 72
Location: Lompoc, California
DavidP wrote:
I'm kitbashing about 16 Revell 1/429 scale USS Arizonas into the US navy's OBBs(Old Battleships) including the California late war period. download/file.php?id=101074&mode=view
viewtopic.php?f=59&t=165105



thats awesome! I will most definitely have to follow your progress on this

_________________
Complete:
1/700 USS California BB-44 (Trumpeter)
1/700 USS South Dakota BB-57 (Trumpeter)

in progress:
1/700 USS Montana BB-67
1/700 USS Houston CL-81

Waiting Drydock
1/700 USS Guam CB-2
1/700 Sigourney DD-643
1/700 USS South Dakota BB-49


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:06 am
Posts: 2173
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Betelguese90 wrote:
Wow, I thought I had posted my images for my completed 1/700 Uss California. I know its not perfect, and not a 100% true backdate from 1945 to 1944, but its close enough for me. Plans are to put it in a Dio with a tamiya 1/700 Uss Cushing converted to a uss Sigourney DD-643.


Was also left over with a bunch of parts for the Colorado class as well.


Betelgeuse,

Great build! Looking sharp!

I'm guessing you used the Trumpeter 1945 California kit instead of the Trumpeter's 1944 West Virginia kit? If you recall earlier in the thread, SeanF said the 1944 West Virginia is actually identical in configuration to the California of the same year, except for the main armament.

Either way, it looks good! :thumbs_up_1:

_________________
"Haijun" means "navy" in Mandarin Chinese.

"You have enemies? Good. It means you stood up for something in your life."- Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2017 7:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2017 10:20 am
Posts: 72
Location: Lompoc, California
Haijun watcher wrote:
Betelguese90 wrote:
Wow, I thought I had posted my images for my completed 1/700 Uss California. I know its not perfect, and not a 100% true backdate from 1945 to 1944, but its close enough for me. Plans are to put it in a Dio with a tamiya 1/700 Uss Cushing converted to a uss Sigourney DD-643.


Was also left over with a bunch of parts for the Colorado class as well.


Betelgeuse,

Great build! Looking sharp!

I'm guessing you used the Trumpeter 1945 California kit instead of the Trumpeter's 1944 West Virginia kit? If you recall earlier in the thread, SeanF said the 1944 West Virginia is actually identical in configuration to the California of the same year, except for the main armament.

Either way, it looks good! :thumbs_up_1:


I didn't see that post until AFTER I bought the 1945 California and had already started assembling and painting her. If I would have researched before hand like I normally do, I would have found that out. Thank you though!

_________________
Complete:
1/700 USS California BB-44 (Trumpeter)
1/700 USS South Dakota BB-57 (Trumpeter)

in progress:
1/700 USS Montana BB-67
1/700 USS Houston CL-81

Waiting Drydock
1/700 USS Guam CB-2
1/700 Sigourney DD-643
1/700 USS South Dakota BB-49


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Nov 12, 2017 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:01 pm
Posts: 80
Really like the way the rebuilds look. I have the Trumpeter USS California in my stash and am excited to build it. It almost looks as if Trumpeter included parts for other battleships in the kit as well, probably to save them creating individual sprues for each ship. My spares box will be very happy.

_________________
The most attractive project, to me, is the one that I've just heard someone say can't be done. :)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 7:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:11 pm
Posts: 157
Location: Lawndale, CA USA
Hey I just saw the pics you posted of your USS California 44', very nice indeed!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 2:27 pm
Posts: 7
Location: Pensacola, FL USA
Hi, all- apologies if this has been covered before, but I haven't found a definitive answer yet. It's crunch time now for my finishing up my 1/700 Trumpeter West Virginia, and I want to depict her how she looked at Surigao Strait. Pictures from her leaving Puget Sound in July '44 have her with SK radar, but later pics in drydock in November have the SK-2. Does anyone know when the changeover happened and which one was carried on 25 October 1944?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2018 9:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 10:37 am
Posts: 164
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Hello Dave, this topic is supposed to be used for the PRE-WAR "Big Fives."

Anyway, look at this AAR: https://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USN/sh ... rigao.html

PART V: (b) (4): "Search radars consisted of 2 SG-1's and one SK."
PART V: (b) (5): "Three R.P.P.I.'s in C.I.C. were set on the following scales on the sets indicated.
(1) 80 miles (SG-1)
(2) 20 miles (SG-1)
(3) 80 miles (SK)"


One would assume the air search radar was SK. However...

PART V: (f) (a): "...No difficulty with land echoes despite the proximity of land, on the scopes of the SK was experienced. it is felt that the SK-2 did away successfully with such echoes."

As English is not my mother tongue, I am not quite sure how this sentence should be interpreted. I personally incline to the feeling that the "SK" was just used as a generic term, but the real type was "SK-2."

FYI, I found no specific information about when the SK-2 was installed neither in Jaroslaw Palasek's "Colorado Class Battleships" nor his "Big Five" books.

_________________
- David
------------
Completed: USS Maryland (BB-46, 1945)
Just building: USS California (BB-44, 1945)


Last edited by Timmy C on Mon Oct 08, 2018 11:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
Posts moved to wartime Big 5 thread


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 314 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Jeff Sharp, Senkan and 4 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group