The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Fri Jun 13, 2025 12:17 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 743 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 ... 38  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 3:18 pm
Posts: 633
Location: Palm Beach, Fla
I use 507A for steeldecks on battleships, MS 1 is nearly black & MS 2 i use on smaller ships.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 1:37 pm
Posts: 19
Location: Hergolshausen, Germany
Thank you!
So I ordered a tin of WEM 507A...

Cheers Ingo


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 5:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:54 am
Posts: 107
Dino Carancini wrote:
...great! :thumbs_up_1:

... what are the wooden handles behind the aircraft identification chart?

Has anyone answered this yet?

My take, given their close proximity to the aircraft recognition panel, that they are smoked glass.

It's a square of dark glass on a wooden handle for use by lookouts and anyone else on the bridge.

But I wouldn't have expected such a quantity of them. Did they come in differentstrengths?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 5:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 1:51 pm
Posts: 2874
You mean the ones bottom row center? Slightly different in appearance.

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:54 am
Posts: 107
EJFoeth wrote:
You mean the ones bottom row center? Slightly different in appearance.


Image
Aye, that's them. While it's possible that they are a more basic design than yours, I had my own doubts as the handles are too long and there being so many.

I can't think of anything else that could be on a bridge? It can't be the janitors prize collection of mops and brooms!

Are they anything to do with the awning?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 1:46 pm
Posts: 94
Location: Off to sea in an MTB
I'd like to built the Trumpeter 1/700 HMS Queen Elizabeth 1918 in the condition she served during the Gallipoli Campaign in 1915 in. Is there an aftermarket set that enables me to do so, or otherwise, what modifications do I have to make?

Thanks, Rob


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:33 am
Posts: 435
Rob,

I'm afraid that, as far as I know, there is no set to make the necessary changes, which I described in a post last year (25 March) on this thread. Parts for the sternwalk can be found on a White Ensign Models photoetch sheet (WEM PE762).

Tim


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 1:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 5:44 pm
Posts: 641
Jim21680 wrote:
It's such a shame none of the Queen Elizabeths were saved. If there was ever a battleship worthy of it, it was one of these.


Warspite was England's CV-6 Enterprise. Both ships had long and gallant careers, several times took a lickin' but kept on tickin', and they were the sort of ships worthy of a berth next to HMS Victory or the USS Constitution. Unfortunately people were too short-sighted after the end of WW2 to give a Image abut preserving anything related to a war they'd rather forget. Instead England scrapped all of their battleships and the USA didn't think to save any carriers until the modernized Essex class were retired. I'm just glad that we saved at least a few of the battlewagons on this side of the pond.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 5:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:34 pm
Posts: 967
Location: Cologne / Germany, sometimes Poznan/ Poland and Chessington/ UK
dsk wrote:
Jim21680 wrote:
It's such a shame none of the Queen Elizabeths were saved. If there was ever a battleship worthy of it, it was one of these.


Warspite was England's CV-6 Enterprise. Both ships had long and gallant careers, several times took a lickin' but kept on tickin', and they were the sort of ships worthy of a berth next to HMS Victory or the USS Constitution. Unfortunately people were too short-sighted after the end of WW2 to give a Image abut preserving anything related to a war they'd rather forget. Instead England scrapped all of their battleships and the USA didn't think to save any carriers until the modernized Essex class were retired. I'm just glad that we saved at least a few of the battlewagons on this side of the pond.


Of course I can understand, that there are or better to say were several ships which people want to have been saved as monument like USS Texas is for example. Personally I find it as half German guy a shame that Germany wasn't some decades ago (around 1965 or so) interested to take over and save old WW-1 SMS Goeben from Turkey, which offered them to buy for a few DM.
On the other hand I have also some understanding that ships were not saved, because you have to take a look on the total situation of the time where the question "saving or scrapping?" was given. Most ships had a special history of war in background, but the money (and desire, as interesting) to save them all was not existing!
At Warspite I see another special background too. Sure, she fought heroic in 2 Wars and has a great history, no doubts, but after she was hit by the Fritz X bombs, she was nearly scrap and after D-Day taken out of service out of this reason. So to save her as monument like HMS Belfast or so, it will have cost a lot of money to repair her first ... money what Great Britain simply didn't have at this time! On the other hand, there were other QE classes, which could be saved cheap. ;-)

_________________
The advantage of wisdom is that you can play dumb; conversely, it is more difficult.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 3:49 am 
Actually Warspite lasted until Walcheron.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 1:46 pm
Posts: 94
Location: Off to sea in an MTB
tjstoneman wrote:
Rob,

I'm afraid that, as far as I know, there is no set to make the necessary changes, which I described in a post last year (25 March) on this thread. Parts for the sternwalk can be found on a White Ensign Models photoetch sheet (WEM PE762).

Tim


Thanks Tim - doesn't sound quite too scary a challenge so may give it a go


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:49 pm
Posts: 571
Location: Hilliard, Ohio
I got the 1/700 Trumpy Queen Elizabeth 1918. Being a US battleship guy I don't know what color gray to get. I am Acrylic paint guy and use Lifecolor for most of my painting. I will say this kit has tweaked in interest in British ships. I don't really mix my paint, I just try to stay away from that and this build in OOB.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 4:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:47 pm
Posts: 3134
Location: Oslo, Norway
Really really disappointing the Trumpeter's 1915 HMS Warspite. Its their 1918 HMS Queen Elizabeth reboxed with a name plate for HMS Warspite, no way that kit is a 1915 HMS Warspite, the kit dosnt offer the difference between HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Warspite, and its not even a 1915 HMS Queen Elizabeth, as it got the late war style searchlight towers around the funnel and no extra Antiship guns on the deck.
What in the world !


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 3:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 2:17 am
Posts: 897
Location: Kingston-upon-Hull Yorkshire England
Last weekend doubts were expressed about my use of white in my build of the QE 1941,well heres a pic I uploaded from a RN HMS Queen Elizabeth website,that sure looks like a lot of white to me!!

Image

Regards Phil

_________________
" If your going though Hell ,keep going!" Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 4:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 3:18 pm
Posts: 633
Location: Palm Beach, Fla
Hi Phil I believe that white blur near the bow are draft markings, they can be clearly seen in other reproductions of that photo(British Battleships of WWII) I believe that white was used but even though it looks too light not to be white it could not have been so. I have no idea what color is there.
John


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 4:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 1:51 pm
Posts: 2874
edit: John just beat me to it ;)

It certainly is not; look at the crop of a nice IWM showing the real white of the draughts marks on a light grey background.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 6:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 3:18 pm
Posts: 633
Location: Palm Beach, Fla
Strange how white the anchors look ?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 2:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:44 pm
Posts: 661
Location: UK
I think that better quality photos clearly show there was no white in that camouflage scheme.


Attachments:
Queen Elizabeth bcs.jpg
Queen Elizabeth bcs.jpg [ 27.18 KiB | Viewed 2551 times ]
Queen Elizabeth bbp.jpg
Queen Elizabeth bbp.jpg [ 23.44 KiB | Viewed 2551 times ]
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:40 am
Posts: 605
Location: Vincennes, FRANCE
It doesn't seems that this point has been discussed before :

what about the propellers in this class of battleships ?

I see that propellers in academy's warspite 1/350 kit, they look somewhat "triangular", and also are the G-factor ones.
Propellers from queen elizabeth from Trumpy are more "classical round shaped".

so ? is the shape from academy the right one ?

_________________
Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead! - David Glasgow Farragut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:34 pm
Posts: 967
Location: Cologne / Germany, sometimes Poznan/ Poland and Chessington/ UK
Atma wrote:
Really really disappointing the Trumpeter's 1915 HMS Warspite. Its their 1918 HMS Queen Elizabeth reboxed with a name plate for HMS Warspite, no way that kit is a 1915 HMS Warspite, the kit dosnt offer the difference between HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Warspite, and its not even a 1915 HMS Queen Elizabeth, as it got the late war style searchlight towers around the funnel and no extra Antiship guns on the deck.
What in the world !


Hi Atma,
I have to say a big thank you about. To be honest, during my Sevastopol build I thought about a scratch build of Trumpeters 1/350 kit into a WW-1 version by using the 1/700 kit as base for "what is all to do" etc. Well .... after your warning here and some further investigation then, I put my idea into the greve yard of silly plans. :big_grin:

_________________
The advantage of wisdom is that you can play dumb; conversely, it is more difficult.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 743 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 ... 38  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Jon Warneke, semRof and 18 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group