The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Wed Apr 17, 2024 7:18 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4786 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167 ... 240  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:41 pm
Posts: 2948
Location: Mocksville, NC
Larry wrote:

Quote:
What about the surface around the stack vents coming out of the funnel top? Do you think that would have been black too, due to soot from the funnels? I assume that's why the caps and mainmast were black.


1) Rule of thumb - Assume ONLY The Watch, keeps you out of trouble! :big_grin:

2. After zooming into your color photo, I think that the flat surface behind the actual large round stack opening is deck gray (same shade as the 40mm mount decks, etc). It appears that the vents coming out of that flat area within the overall stack are the same light gray shade as the stack cap itself. I would paint the inside of the various vent pipes also deck gray (if they are hollow) - that's sort of a guesstimate on those. Also, the stack cap internal divider plates and all internal surfaces are all black.

Hope this helps,

_________________
HMS III
Mocksville, NC
BB62 vet 68-69

Builder's yard:
USS STODDARD (DD-566) 66-68 1:144, Various Lg Scale FC Directors
Finished:
USS NEW JERSEY (BB-62) 67-69 1:200
USN Sloop/Ship PEACOCK (1813) 1:48
ROYAL CAROLINE (1748) 1:47
AVS (1768) 1:48


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 8:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2015 2:16 pm
Posts: 156
Thanks again.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 5:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 10:17 pm
Posts: 137
Location: Tucson, Az.
I am building the uses Missouri 1/200 kit.
What color should the deck be painted?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 5:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:07 pm
Posts: 452
BB62vet wrote:
Since BJS is drawing up a 3D MISSOURI in her 80s configuration he should be aware that the MK. 37 FC directors on board were updated versions of the directors as originally shipped in the '40s. Same true for NEW JERSEY. IOWA and WISCONSIN had their MK. 37s replaced/rebuilt in the 50s to the version that is aboard those ships today. Those Mods are visually different in that the director enclosure body was altered to a flat roof with a raised square body. See below:
Attachment:
BB62 Mainmast & After Stack 1981 (Large).jpg




Thanks, my interpretation is that all four had the same directors with 8 windows in the front. At some time, the IA and WI had theirs replaced with ones with a cupola on the left side.

I'm still looking for measured drawing of these directors though.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 9:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:41 pm
Posts: 2948
Location: Mocksville, NC
Big Jim Slade wrote:
Quote:
Thanks, my interpretation is that all four had the same directors with 8 windows in the front. At some time, the IA and WI had theirs replaced with ones with a cupola on the left side.


Yes - The cupula on the Mk. 37 was a WWII era mod, still present on BB63. I think you need to look over the photos of MISSOURI in her '80s configuration only; don't waste your time with other eras of the ship. If you have the Floating Drydock's USS MISSOURI Plan Book (or EPlan Book) then you can get the basic measurements of the director from that. Some times too much "associated" information can only confuse the issue. Concentrate on finding photos of Modern MO only and see where the director changes occurred.

Here is a photo of MISSOURI's port side MK. 37 director as she sits today in PH:
Attachment:
BB63 Port Director Modern.JPG
BB63 Port Director Modern.JPG [ 26.2 KiB | Viewed 1726 times ]



Hope this helps.

Hank

_________________
HMS III
Mocksville, NC
BB62 vet 68-69

Builder's yard:
USS STODDARD (DD-566) 66-68 1:144, Various Lg Scale FC Directors
Finished:
USS NEW JERSEY (BB-62) 67-69 1:200
USN Sloop/Ship PEACOCK (1813) 1:48
ROYAL CAROLINE (1748) 1:47
AVS (1768) 1:48


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 4:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:41 pm
Posts: 2948
Location: Mocksville, NC
DavidP wrote:
Quote:
would the new jersey have the same modified directors?


No, NEW JERSEY did not have the cupula on her directors:
Attachment:
BB62 MK37 - 1981.JPG
BB62 MK37 - 1981.JPG [ 15.77 KiB | Viewed 2727 times ]

That's her in 1981 prior to her modernization
Attachment:
BB62 MK37 - 2003.JPG
BB62 MK37 - 2003.JPG [ 23.04 KiB | Viewed 2727 times ]

Same director in 2003 as a museum, after her last commission

Hope this helps,

Hank

_________________
HMS III
Mocksville, NC
BB62 vet 68-69

Builder's yard:
USS STODDARD (DD-566) 66-68 1:144, Various Lg Scale FC Directors
Finished:
USS NEW JERSEY (BB-62) 67-69 1:200
USN Sloop/Ship PEACOCK (1813) 1:48
ROYAL CAROLINE (1748) 1:47
AVS (1768) 1:48


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 4:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 10:17 pm
Posts: 137
Location: Tucson, Az.
I have started the building of the Missouri kit.
Very nice kit.
The first page is attaching the front hull pieces to the main part of the hull.
No surprises. I also added the hull skeg pieces and underwater hull strakes.
All of the parts fit very nicely.

Now is the time to paint the hull before adding any details.
I bought Tamiya dull red spray paint. I am happy with the color. Just a little bit too red but not
Like a fire engine red.
Looks ok.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 5:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 10:17 pm
Posts: 137
Location: Tucson, Az.
Trying to post my Missouri project.
Where should Ipost?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 5:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Post build reports as a new thread in the Picture Post -> Works in Progress section: viewforum.php?f=59


I've been moving your questions regarding the Missouri to the Iowa class thread: viewtopic.php?f=47&t=4683
Please use that thread only for questions, not for progress reports. And please ensure you are hitting the "Post Reply" button instead of the "New Topic" option when you're inside that thread.

_________________
De quoi s'agit-il?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Nov 19, 2016 9:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:07 pm
Posts: 452
BB62vet wrote:
DavidP wrote:
Quote:
would the new jersey have the same modified directors?


No, NEW JERSEY did not have the cupula on her directors:


There must be a lot of variations on the MK 37. It looks to me like the back of those o n the NJ is curved.Yet I have encountered no diagrams of a MK 37 showing a curved back.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Nov 19, 2016 10:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:41 pm
Posts: 2948
Location: Mocksville, NC
BJS wrote:
Quote:
It looks to me like the back of those o n the NJ is curved.Yet I have encountered no diagrams of a MK 37 showing a curved back.


NEW JERSEY (and the other 3 IOWA class ships) do not have curved backs on their Mk. 37 FC Directors. Here is a good example of the typ. MK. 37 from the Warships Illustrated CA-139 booklet:
Attachment:
Mk. 37 Director wMk. 25 Radar.jpg
Mk. 37 Director wMk. 25 Radar.jpg [ 34.07 KiB | Viewed 2614 times ]

This illustration is of the director with the cupula, NJ's do not have the cupula and as far as my photos go back (1945) never did. You might check NavSource to verify this further back. The director Mods also differed in the number of frontal face openings they employed.

The Trumpeter model of MISSOURI does have the director with cupula which for my purposes was incorrect. Model Monkey provided the correct Mk/Mod for building a correct NEW JERSEY (regardless of era).

Hope this helps,

Hank

_________________
HMS III
Mocksville, NC
BB62 vet 68-69

Builder's yard:
USS STODDARD (DD-566) 66-68 1:144, Various Lg Scale FC Directors
Finished:
USS NEW JERSEY (BB-62) 67-69 1:200
USN Sloop/Ship PEACOCK (1813) 1:48
ROYAL CAROLINE (1748) 1:47
AVS (1768) 1:48


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 9:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:07 pm
Posts: 452
BB62vet wrote:
BJS wrote:
Quote:
It looks to me like the back of those o n the NJ is curved.Yet I have encountered no diagrams of a MK 37 showing a curved back.


NEW JERSEY (and the other 3 IOWA class ships) do not have curved backs on their Mk. 37 FC Directors.


Here is the kind of thing that is confusing me. This picture of the NJ appears to show a rounded back, squared off by a triangular filler at the top. The position of the range finder covering suggests little angle in the photo.


Attachments:
NJ DIrector.jpg
NJ DIrector.jpg [ 152.09 KiB | Viewed 2583 times ]
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 9:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:07 pm
Posts: 452
When I looked at the photo uploaded (especially when resized to fit the limits of the site) the details I referred to were not clear. Here is a filtered version that shows the triangle more clearly.


Attachments:
NJ DIrector Enh.jpg
NJ DIrector Enh.jpg [ 187.87 KiB | Viewed 2581 times ]
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 11:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:07 pm
Posts: 452
DavidP wrote:
that back is not rounded but angular because of the bottom of that triangular piece has straight edges not curved.


Yes, it could well be faceted. Yet I have found no diagrams showing a MK 37 with a faceted back.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 5:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:30 pm
Posts: 252
Location: Fullerton, CA
The Iowa and New Jersey had angled back directors installed while the Missouri and Wisconsin had square back directors installed. Same with the main battery directors.
The square back directors had the commanders copula while the angle back have a hatch

The extension to the back of the MK37 director was added when they installed the Mk 12 height finding radar to the MK 22 radar.
There wasn't enough room for the additional equipment so they added the extensions.

New Jersey before the extension
http://www.navsource.org/archives/01/016259.jpg

New Jersey after the extension
http://navsource.org/archives/01/062/016209m.jpg


Last edited by James M on Sun Nov 20, 2016 6:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 6:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:30 pm
Posts: 252
Location: Fullerton, CA
The Iowa and Wisconsin have a completely different director shield installed now

Iowa and Wisconson:
http://www.navsource.org/archives/01/0161077.jpg

Iowa:
The Iowa had hers changed after her Korean war tour when they upgraded the radar
http://www.navsource.org/archives/01/0161047.jpg


These where installed on a lot of Essex class carries also


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Some confusion?
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 10:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 10:17 pm
Posts: 137
Location: Tucson, Az.
What year was the USS Missouri deck painted blue?
Was the top sides blue like theTrumpter model kit box illustration shows?

Just trying to get things right.
Please let me know if you know.
Thanks! Don


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Some confusion?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 10:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:07 pm
Posts: 452
Three Missouris wrote:
What year was the USS Missouri deck painted blue?
Was the top sides blue like theTrumpter model kit box illustration shows?


According to Sumerall, June 1944.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 2:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 3825
A little clarification on Mk 37 directors.

The earliest Mk 37 directors, seen on mostly SIMS-BENSON-GLEAVES class destroyers, the first four ATLANTA class cruisers and early production fast battleships, had what is called TAPER-BACKED Mk 37 directors. The Mk 37 directors were changed to the SQUARE-BACKED version (FLETCHER class and just about every cruiser built during WWII) on new construction in late 1941-early 1942.

The initial radar installed on Mk 37 destroyers was the FD (Mk 4) radar which worked fine on the TAPER-BACKED Mk 37 directors. The newer and improved Mk 12 and Mk 22 radars were intended to replace the Mk 4 radars and were installed on the SQUARE-BACKED Mk 37 directors, with extensions added on the back for the additional electronics required for those radars. However the improved Mk 12 radar and Mk 22 height finder radar COULDN'T be fitted in the TAPER-BACKED directors and NEVER had Mk 12 radar installed on them. The Mk 22 radar was installed on some TAPER-BACKED Mk 37 directors with the Mk 4 radar on BENSON-GLEAVES class destroyers. On destroyers the USN didn't want to go to the expense and weight penalties of removing TAPER-BACKED and installing new SQUARE-BACKED Mk 37 directors. However, on the large units, it was desired to have the full Mk 12/22 radar capability installed and the weight penalty was NOT an issue. Hence the Mk 37 directors on the Fast Battleships were modified with new housings (changing the whole fire control and drive train was unnecessary) for those units completed with TAPER-BACKED Mk 37 directors.

The cupola was an upgrade mod for the Gun Captain position on the Mk 37 director that was intended to be installed on ALL SQUARE-BACKED directors, but never was applied to all directors once the war was over. The addition of the cupola DID NOT change the Mod number of the director.

Jim, the triangular "box" on the back of director is part of the extension and the "boxes" on the side are part of her "mothball" covers of the rangefinder. The backs of the Mk 37 directors are the SQUARE-BACK version.

Just for the record according to Armament Summaries in 1960 the Mk 37 directors on the IOWA class when they all had been upgraded to Mk 25 radar were;

BB-61 and BB-62; one Mk 37 Mod 8, two Mk 37 Mod 9, and one Mk 37 Mod 10

BB-63 and BB-64; one Mk 37 Mod 11, two Mk 37 Mod 12, and one Mk 37 Mod 13

The Mod numbers likely were changed when the upgrades and during the 1980s reactivation.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 9:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:07 pm
Posts: 452
Here are a couple of photos I found of the Alabama they seem to show more clearly the same shape as the one example posted from the NJ.
Image
Image

Sadly, I can't tell if all the directors are roughly the same in shape? I can't really tell the configuration of the doors. You can see in these pictures two doors on the top with a third filled in. Also, there appears to be filled in doors on the front of [some] directors on the NJ.

I am shocked that this information is so hard to find considering how widely used the MK 37 was used.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4786 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167 ... 240  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group