The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Thu Apr 18, 2024 6:34 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 972 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 ... 49  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2016 2:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 7:24 am
Posts: 2
I am using Open Source Blender. It is a powerful software.
AC


Attachments:
gun01.jpg
gun01.jpg [ 81.27 KiB | Viewed 3528 times ]
gun02.jpg
gun02.jpg [ 73.95 KiB | Viewed 3528 times ]
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 3:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 9:25 am
Posts: 2256
Location: Los Angeles and Houston
I don't know why I didn't think of doing this earlier regarding the Shelf Oddity PE set with the Slanted Bridge Roof.

But here are a few illustrations that show that the front of the bridge roof aren't slanted down at the front.

Here is an annotated image/illustration of the bridge, with lines showing the top of the bridge roof edge, and then the line of the top of the windows under the bridge, as it exists in the photos and illustrations, both being parallel to each other:

Attachment:
Kirishima Bridge annotated.jpg
Kirishima Bridge annotated.jpg [ 173.58 KiB | Viewed 3403 times ]


Which means that the roof EDGE does not slope downwards in the front.


And here is an illustration of the same Bridge without the lines showing the straight top of the bridge roof edge (which doesn't mean that the roof itself does not slant down TO this edge, merely that the edge itself is straight, and the straight line of the top of the windows being parallel:

Attachment:
Kirishima Bridge.jpg
Kirishima Bridge.jpg [ 195.58 KiB | Viewed 3403 times ]


And here is an annotated illustration of what the Shelf Oddity Bridge Roof Edge does, showing that it does not follow the line of the bridge roof edge:

Attachment:
Kirishima Bridge Annotated I.jpg
Kirishima Bridge Annotated I.jpg [ 173.23 KiB | Viewed 3403 times ]


And that illustrates the difference I have been talking about between the roof being slanted down from the Center to a Level Roof Edge, and the roof EDGE slanting down at the front.

MB

_________________
OMG LOOK! A signature

Working on:


1/700 (All Fall 1942):
HIJMS Nagara
HIJMS Aoba & Kinugasa
USS San Francisco
USS Helena
USS St. Louis
USS Laffey & Farenholt
HIJMS Sub-Chasers No. 4 - 7
HIJMS Sub-Chasers No. 13 - 16


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 10:51 pm 
Hey guys! Does any one know if Pontos is to come out with a 1/350 super detail set of Haruna for the Fujimi kit???


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2016 8:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 9:05 am
Posts: 12
For those who has not seen it , new? manufacturer with Kongo from 1914

http://hlj.com/product/KJKKM70001


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 01, 2017 7:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8571
Location: New York City
It should prove popular.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Feb 12, 2017 8:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:06 am
Posts: 3154
Location: Vancouver, Canada
To Dan and Atma,

What fit is the Fujimi Haruna (Toku-25 kit) supposed to be? 1941 or 1944/45?

Also, is the Fujimi double set (SP-35) that includes Kongo and Haruna supposed to depict them in early or late war fit?

_________________
"Haijun" means "navy" in Mandarin Chinese.

"You have enemies? Good. It means you stood up for something in your life."- Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Feb 12, 2017 8:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Haijun watcher wrote:
To Dan and Atma,

What fit is the Fujimi Haruna (Toku-25 kit) supposed to be? 1941 or 1944/45?

It includes the Type 21 radar, so not 1941. The description in the photos contains a lot of references 1944 - that, plus the fact their 1/350 kit was also 1944, strongly suggests it's meant to be 1944 fit.


Haijun watcher wrote:
Also, is the Fujimi double set (SP-35) that includes Kongo and Haruna supposed to depict them in early or late war fit?


1944, according to Hobby Search (worth bookmarking for future reference, by the way): http://www.1999.co.jp/eng/10271735

_________________
De quoi s'agit-il?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Feb 12, 2017 10:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:06 am
Posts: 3154
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Thank you Timmy for the prompt answer.

It doesn't seem like there's a 1941-42 version of Haruna out there then in 1/700 scale, unless backdating either a Fujimi or a Hasegawa Haruna only requires removing the radar and some AA positions.

_________________
"Haijun" means "navy" in Mandarin Chinese.

"You have enemies? Good. It means you stood up for something in your life."- Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 7:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8571
Location: New York City
Unfortunately, backdating the kit is your only option if your are set on an early war version. Or, yes, work with the older Hasegawa kit.

The hull and deck of the Hasegawa kit are pretty good, shape wise. The A-C handling deck is a little generic.. Maybe a kit bash of the superstructures/turrets is in order?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 8:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 9:25 am
Posts: 2256
Location: Los Angeles and Houston
Isn't this Haruna capable of being built in a 41/42 outfit?

http://www.ebay.com/itm/FUJIMI-1-700-42 ... 258c29c4d1


Image


From the images they show, the "Completed" (painted) images show a different pagoda-mast structure and top, and the absence of many of the AA guns that were added after 1943.

Specifically the third pair of Type 89 127mm DP guns, the Type 96 25mm AA guns on the Turrets, on the forward bridge platform, and all along the aft hull, P/S of the #4 Turret (I'm sure there are others I have missed)

It does show that there are a few Casemate 6" guns missing for a 1941/42 outfit. But adding those would be fairly easy.

And it says it can be built as either Full-Hull or Waterline.

Or.....

Is that picture lying to us???

MB

_________________
OMG LOOK! A signature

Working on:


1/700 (All Fall 1942):
HIJMS Nagara
HIJMS Aoba & Kinugasa
USS San Francisco
USS Helena
USS St. Louis
USS Laffey & Farenholt
HIJMS Sub-Chasers No. 4 - 7
HIJMS Sub-Chasers No. 13 - 16


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 11:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8571
Location: New York City
I agree that the boxart makes it look like an early war fit, but if you look at the buildup, instructions, etc, it's a late war version: http://www.1999.co.jp/eng/image/10098708/10/0


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:47 pm
Posts: 3134
Location: Oslo, Norway
All you have to do is look at IJN Haruna's pagoda for determine what year the model is representing. Having a reduced in height pagoda as in the picture, is 1943+ version without further questions.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:47 pm
Posts: 3134
Location: Oslo, Norway
Haijun watcher wrote:
Thank you Timmy for the prompt answer.

It doesn't seem like there's a 1941-42 version of Haruna out there then in 1/700 scale, unless backdating either a Fujimi or a Hasegawa Haruna only requires removing the radar and some AA positions.

IJN Haruna's pagoda is partially different from a pre 1943. Fujimi's kit is 1943+ so some scratch building is required, take a look(And if I remember correctly, Hasegawa's kit is also a pre 1943 but I may be wrong):
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Feb 19, 2017 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:06 am
Posts: 3154
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Atma wrote:
(And if I remember correctly, Hasegawa's kit is also a pre 1943 but I may be wrong):


There seems to be radar on the box art of the Hasegawa 1/700 Haruna, so I assume 1944.

_________________
"Haijun" means "navy" in Mandarin Chinese.

"You have enemies? Good. It means you stood up for something in your life."- Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Feb 19, 2017 8:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 12:45 am
Posts: 55
Haijun watcher wrote:
Atma wrote:
(And if I remember correctly, Hasegawa's kit is also a pre 1943 but I may be wrong):


There seems to be radar on the box art of the Hasegawa 1/700 Haruna, so I assume 1944.

I doubt Hasegawa's kit is 1944. Haruna installed Type 21 radar in 1943.4, that means Hasegawa's kit is absolutely after 1943.4. Since Haruna installed Type 13 radar in 1944.6, that kit is before 1944.6.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:02 pm
Posts: 2350
Location: Herndon, VA
I'm currently working on Kajika's new Kongo. I'm trying to determine if the ship had railing along its turret tops in 1914-16. Pictures of FUSO from the period show it, but none of the various (and rare) pictures of the Kongo battlecruisers seem to show it.

Anyone have better resources?

Thanks!

_________________
- Chris

1/700 Saratoga w/Pontos (Needs paint)
1/700 Potato w/Kurama (On hold)
1/700 Murdertorpedoboat Ooi


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 7:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8571
Location: New York City
I have a few photos of her on trials prior to commissioning, and in early service. I don't see any railings until the early 1920s.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:02 pm
Posts: 2350
Location: Herndon, VA
Thanks, Dan. I was leaning that way. Do you have any detailed "on deck" images showing any bulkhead-side equipment or other detail? Kaika's kit is wonderful but lacking in that.

_________________
- Chris

1/700 Saratoga w/Pontos (Needs paint)
1/700 Potato w/Kurama (On hold)
1/700 Murdertorpedoboat Ooi


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8571
Location: New York City
In my first quick run thru, I really don't see a lot of detail. I will continue searching through some other references.


Attachments:
Kongo as built, undated 1b.jpg
Kongo as built, undated 1b.jpg [ 181 KiB | Viewed 2030 times ]
Kongo as built, undated 2.jpg
Kongo as built, undated 2.jpg [ 196.05 KiB | Viewed 2030 times ]
Kongo, Irish Sea on April 20, 1913.jpg
Kongo, Irish Sea on April 20, 1913.jpg [ 104.19 KiB | Viewed 2030 times ]
Kongo, Yokosuka, July 1914.jpg
Kongo, Yokosuka, July 1914.jpg [ 140.56 KiB | Viewed 2030 times ]
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Feb 22, 2017 6:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2015 2:54 am
Posts: 355
Location: Bad Krozingen/Germany
Perhaps I'm wrong, but on the pics I don't see the torpedo nets.
Only the support for it, it is right. Where they perhaps added later in Japan?
I will start my Kajika kit soon, and this is the most obvious missing part.

Greetings Christian

_________________
At work:
1/700 Fujimi IJN Shokaku 1941
1/700 Aoshima IJN Hayasui 1944
1/700 Aoshima IJN Yukikaze 1945
1/700 Rainbowmodel Fuyuzuki 1945


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 972 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 ... 49  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group