The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Thu Apr 25, 2024 6:30 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 124 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 2:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:54 am
Posts: 107
Dino Carancini wrote:
..perhaps this one?

This is the one built by Luciano Rizzato: http://www.navymodeling.com/Foto2004_Luciano_Invincible.html


Yes, that's it! :-) I've looked for that several times but didn't know the name of the actual ship to google under. Much appreciated.

I wanted to find this so as to look at the form of the hull under the waterline.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 5:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:08 pm
Posts: 942
Interesting close-up of Invincible's main bridge. Photo taken in January 1915 when Invincible was in Gibraltar's dry dock undergoing repairs to damage sustained during Falklands battle.
Image
Arrangement of Invincible's 1915 bridge are not shown correctly in any of the drawings of this ship that I have seen so far.

_________________
"On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron." H. L. Mencken


Last edited by DariusP on Thu Jun 13, 2013 9:43 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 3:05 pm
Posts: 421
Gathering info to build Comberg 1/350 Indefatigable. Does anyone know whether she still had torpedo nets rigged at Jutland and was her upper hull and superstructure light grey, colorcoats GW01 or medium grey GW02?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 4:23 pm 
This famous photo of INVINCIBLE was taken from Capt Luce's GLASGOW , and shows her chasing Spee's squadron after exiting Port Stanley harbour.

Cannot see any evidence of torpedo nets.

Cheers, Nigel


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 4:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 9:12 am
Posts: 70
Doh! Origianl post will show once moderated, here is the link I forgot...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:HMSInvincible1907.jpg


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 8179
Location: New Jersey
DariusP wrote:
Arrangement of Invincible's 1915 bridge are not shown correctly in any of the drawings of this ship that I have seen so far.

I had an e-mail correspondence with John Roberts about this back when I built my Invincible. He indicated that he had missed that in his post Falklands drawings of the ship. Thanks to a revised drawing he made for me, I added it:
Image
nigel999 wrote:
This famous photo of INVINCIBLE was taken from Capt Luce's GLASGOW , and shows her chasing Spee's squadron after exiting Port Stanley harbour.
Cannot see any evidence of torpedo nets.

Cheers, Nigel

They were reattached by Jutland, at least on Invincible. I have seen a photo in a book on Jutland that shows this, after being told about it on another forum.

_________________
Martin

"Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." John Wayne

Ship Model Gallery


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 9:12 am
Posts: 70
MartinJQuinn wrote:
They were reattached by Jutland, at least on Invincible. I have seen a photo in a book on Jutland that shows this, after being told about it on another forum.


I would be interested in seeing that photo , if you could post it.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jun 23, 2013 8:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 3:05 pm
Posts: 421
So for battlecruisers at Jutland, with or without nets:
Lion -no
Princess Royal -no
Queen Mary -yes
Tiger -never had them
New Zealand - no
Indefatigable -?
Invincible - yes
Indomitable -no
Inflexible -no

Does this sound right?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jun 23, 2013 8:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 18
MartinJQuinn wrote:
They were reattached by Jutland, at least on Invincible. I have seen a photo in a book on Jutland that shows this, after being told about it on another forum.


I think the photo must be incorrectly dated.

The gunnery officer of Derfflinger (the ship which destroyed Invincible, and the man responsible for dealing the blow) mentioned later:

Quote:
"The [Derfflinger's] after torpedo net had been shot away and was hanging over the port screw' the ship had to stop for several minutes at the height of the battle 'How many times had were cursed at not having rid ourselves of these heavy steel torpedo nets, weighing several hundred tons. As we hardly ever anchored at sea they were useless, and in any case, they only protected part of the ship against torpedo fire. On the other hand, they were a serious source of danger, as they reduced the ship's speed considerably and were bound sooner or later to foul the propellers, which meant the loss of the ship. For these reasons the English had scrapped their torpedo nets shortly before the war - we did not do so until after the battle of Skagerrak (Jutland) and only then as a result of our experience."


I've seen no evidence for photos of Invincible with her net defences from 1914, and video footage of the wreckage of the Invincible does not apparently show net debris.

Andy


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jun 23, 2013 8:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 18
Indefatigable, 3pm, May 31st 1916. No nets.

Image

Andy


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jun 23, 2013 10:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 9:12 am
Posts: 70
In "Warships of WW1 " by HM Le Fleming, there is an IWM creditied photo of INDEFATIGABLE "in 1916" . No Torpedo nets apparent.

There is also a published photo, of either 1st or 2nd BCS steaming out to meet the HSF on the mornin g of the Jutland action , Thus would show QUEEN MARY or INDEFATIGABLE .
I cannot recall which , but certain it is one of the 2. I know I have it, but cannot for the life of me recall in which book.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jun 23, 2013 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 3:05 pm
Posts: 421
I think the same photo of Indefatigable with no nets and shortened top-masts is in "The Battle of Jutland 1916" by Lawrence Philips on pg#147. Also on the same page is a picture of Lion ? steaming at high speed with Q turret smoking. If you look close she has nets. Other pictures of her after the battle with Q turret removed are with no nets. Maybe they were taken off when she was in for repair? I also don't think Invincible had nets at Jutland, you can't see any trace of them from the photos of her bow and stern sticking out of the water after she was destroyed, and none of the wreck pictures show any evidence of nets. Granted, these are not very clear, but she is the one ship, that because she still exists, we should be able to find out for sure.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 12:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 8179
Location: New Jersey
Monty999p wrote:
MartinJQuinn wrote:
They were reattached by Jutland, at least on Invincible. I have seen a photo in a book on Jutland that shows this, after being told about it on another forum.


I would be interested in seeing that photo , if you could post it.


I wrote myself a note to scan it.

_________________
Martin

"Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." John Wayne

Ship Model Gallery


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 1:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 18
Updating Dan's list:

Lion -no
Princess Royal -no
Queen Mary -yes ...This photo is of her, taken from HMS Tiger, steaming at Jutland.
Image
Tiger -never had them
New Zealand - no
Indefatigable -no
Invincible - probably not. There's a photo of her here, in the act of exploding
Indomitable -no
Inflexible -no

Andy


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 4:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 9:12 am
Posts: 70
Good shout Andy, the photo you have posted was the one I have been trying to track down!

To put me out of my misery, could you remind me which book its in?

Cheers


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jun 30, 2013 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 8179
Location: New Jersey
Here is the photo I was speaking of. It's from "The Fighting at Jutland, Abridged Edition", published by MacMillan and Co LTD, September 1921. The copy I have looks every bit it's 92 years.
Attachment:
File comment: The photo is one of three on a page of photos
InvincibleJutland0001.jpg
InvincibleJutland0001.jpg [ 190.84 KiB | Viewed 2749 times ]

Attachment:
File comment: Close up with caption
InvincibleJutland0002.jpg
InvincibleJutland0002.jpg [ 180.6 KiB | Viewed 2749 times ]

Attachment:
File comment: Only the photo in question - note the torpedo net davits.
InvincibleJutland0003.jpg
InvincibleJutland0003.jpg [ 539.84 KiB | Viewed 2749 times ]

Also in the book is the same picture posted in the post above. Here is a larger version of it:
Attachment:
QueenMaryJutland0001.jpg
QueenMaryJutland0001.jpg [ 552.07 KiB | Viewed 2749 times ]

_________________
Martin

"Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." John Wayne

Ship Model Gallery


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jun 30, 2013 5:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 18
I'd reply but my IP Address is apparently "blocked for spamming".

Andy


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 5:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 18
Burt's Battleships of the Grand Fleet has photos captioned:

"Invincible with her funnel bands as painted up 1909/1910. This photo was taken sometime between 1910/1912 and shows the rangefinder drums..." (torpedo net defences are fitted, all funnels are the same height.)

"Invincible at Malta in 1913/1914. As will be seen, the anti-torpedo nets have been removed and the wings of the forward bridge extended..."

"Inflexible and Indomitable on North Sea Patrol c. 1915. Note that Inflexible still has her anti-torpedo nets."

(My emphasis)

Invincible's fore funnel height was only raised to match that of her sisters while in Gibraltar (during Jan/Feb 1915) after the Battle of the Falklands, December 1914.

NJM Campbell's Battlecruisers (Warship Special #1) follows the pattern above.

John Robert's Battlecruisers has a great photo of Invincible "entering Malta Harbour in October 1913" with equal-height funnels and no net booms. It would seem strange to put nets back on in wartime: Scapa and Rosyth were believed to be pretty safe from submarine attack, and the nets are only a hindrance at sea and in action.

What I need to convince me is a photo of Invincible with the raised forward funnel and net booms. I doubt there is one.

If this post passes the forum's censors I'll wade in with my thoughts on Martin's pictures.

Andy


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 6:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 18
The first photo.

It could be just about any large vessel with torpedo nets making smoke/steaming fast. But is it Invincible at Jutland? (I suspect it isn't: I've never seen the image before, and I think I have a pretty good handle on most of the images taken during the action.) Is it taken during wartime speed trials? Maybe it's Inflexible in the North Sea in 1915/1916?

Andy


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 6:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 18
The second photo. I'm going to stick my neck out.

This could be the Indefatigable blowing up. It's a cloud very similar in shape to a more famous photo from a different angle taken at the same sort of time. The natural location for the photographer would be onboard HMS New Zealand, looking aft. And onboard NZ, there's an eye-witness who says:

"While we were still looking at her (Indefatigable), she was hit again by two shells / both shells appeared to explode on impact. There was an interval of about thirty seconds and then the ship completely blew up. The main explosion / immediately followed by a dense dark smoke cloud which obscured the ship from view."

Thirty seconds = plenty of time to get a camera ready.

Andy


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 124 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group