The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Sat May 26, 2018 10:35 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 456 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:29 pm
Posts: 1719
task force 58 wrote:
Can the 1/350 trumpeter North Carolina kit be built as the USS Washington during her Atlantic war period without heavy modification?

It depends on your definition of "heavy modification". The biggest difference was the layout of the 20MM and .50cal guns. I can give you my best guess about the differences. Contact me off line dick_jensen_44@msn.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 11:55 pm 
No one noticed the funnels are completely wrong but yet you're wondering about the scale diameter of the 16" rifles? None of you geniuses have calipers? Total :censored_2: in outline like most of Trumpeter's models. I've been on the real ship many times and viewed it from the other side of the Cape fear river and know this model looks WRONG.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 7:16 am 
Offline
Model Monkey
Model Monkey

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 2914
Location: USA
guest wrote:
No one noticed the funnels are completely wrong but yet you're wondering about the scale diameter of the 16" rifles? None of you geniuses have calipers? Total :censored_2: in outline like most of Trumpeter's models. I've been on the real ship many times and viewed it from the other side of the Cape fear river and know this model looks WRONG.

Some good news! Accurately shaped, sized and detailed 3D-printed products for North Carolina class battleships are available in several popular scales:

Here is a sample for 1/350 scale.
Funnels: http://shpws.me/O8YC
16"/45 cal. turret set (barrels are accurate, too): http://shpws.me/OBzG
5"/38 cal. twin-gun mount set with fixed trunnions: http://shpws.me/MCrd
5"/38 cal. twin-gun mount set with separate trunnions: http://shpws.me/MCrf
Mk.37 directors (angle-back): http://shpws.me/Obpc
Mk.38 directors: http://shpws.me/NW0D
Ready service ammunition lockers for 20mm Oerlikons: http://shpws.me/P98f

Most of these products are also available in 1/570 (for Revell) and 1/700.

If you are building USS North Carolina as she appeared after a fatal 1945 friendly fire accident destroyed the functionality of her port-side Mk.37 director, you'll need a single square-back director. The one damaged angle-back was replaced with a square-back (see photo below). 3D-printed "square-back" directors are available, too: http://shpws.me/JEkF

Please take advantage of Shapeways' FREE SHIPPING offer for sales of more than $25 on "Cyber Monday", November 27th.


Attachments:
BB-55 Mk.37 directors at present..jpg
BB-55 Mk.37 directors at present..jpg [ 197.37 KiB | Viewed 1148 times ]

_________________
Have fun, Monkey around.

-Steve Larsen

Complete catalog of over 1,700 designs for scale modelers:
https://modelmonkey.wixsite.com/modelmonkey
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2018 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2017 12:02 pm
Posts: 33
Location: TX
In doing some BB research, I've run across a curious discrepancy. Depending on the source, NC is credited with either 12 or 15 WW2 battle stars. DANFS says 15, but several books, including Alan Pater's "United States Battleships," say 12.

I have not run into this discrepancy with any other BB, and I'm wondering if anyone knows the reason for the difference in numbers. Pater lists the 12 as follows:

1 star Guadalcanal/Tulagi landings, 7-9 Aug. 1942
1 star Battle of Eastern Solomons, 23-25 Aug. 1942
1 star Gilbert Islands operation, 19 Nov.-8 Dec. 1943
1 star Marshall Islands operation, 29 Jan.-8 Feb. 1944
1 star Asiatic-Pacific raids, 1944
1 star Western New Guinea operation, 21-24 Apr. 1944
1 star Marianas operation, June 1944
1 star Leyte operation, Nov.-Dec. 1944
1 star Luzon operation, Jan. 1945
1 star Iwo Jima operation, Feb.-Mar. 1945
1 star Okinawa Gunto operation, 17 Mar.-27 Apr. 1945
1 star 3rd Fleet operations against Japan, 10 Jul.-15 Aug. 1945

The NC website lists three more campaigns, but battle stars are not mentioned, although I assume these are the missing ones:

Capture and Defense of Guadalcanal August 16, 1942 – February 8, 1943
New Georgia Group Operations June 30 – August 31, 1943
Bismark Archipelago Operations December 25, 1943

_________________
"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way."
- Captain John Paul Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2018 8:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:12 pm
Posts: 1728
North Carolina received 12 battle stars for World War II service.
http://www.hazegray.org/danfs/battlesh/bb55.htm


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2018 9:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2017 12:02 pm
Posts: 33
Location: TX
According to this version of DANFS, it's 15.

_________________
"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way."
- Captain John Paul Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 5:33 pm
Posts: 304
DavidP wrote:
North Carolina received 12 battle stars for World War II service.
http://www.hazegray.org/danfs/battlesh/bb55.htm


Actually it was 15 battle stars and she happens to be the most decorated US Battleship of WW2 to boot.

_________________
1/700 HMS Hood WIP
1/700 HMS Prince of Wales WIP


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 5:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 5:33 pm
Posts: 304
Question regarding boot topping placement on Trumpeter 1/700. Do I put it above the hull break point or below or split it in between? Im building a full hull. I put it BELOW hull break and it looks off a bit. Help?

_________________
1/700 HMS Hood WIP
1/700 HMS Prince of Wales WIP


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 9:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:12 pm
Posts: 1728
split.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2018 5:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 5:33 pm
Posts: 304
Is there a schematic out there for Measure 12 Modified (splotches) camouflage that Washington wore in the Atlantic? I am talking the one with navy blue hull, ocean gray superstructures mixed with some haze gray tops. I assume the decks were already navy blue also.

I found only this one so far which Im not sure is accurate and only one sided...


Attachments:
bb56-11.jpg
bb56-11.jpg [ 111.89 KiB | Viewed 567 times ]
washington bb56 atlantic.jpg
washington bb56 atlantic.jpg [ 45.65 KiB | Viewed 567 times ]

_________________
1/700 HMS Hood WIP
1/700 HMS Prince of Wales WIP
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2018 10:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 4:59 pm
Posts: 155
Location: Austin, TX
I drew the color profile you've attached - it was drawn using photo references only, since (as far as I can tell) there are no decent schematics available that show the pattern, and the USN did not issue design patterns for Ms12mod as it did the Measure 31-32-33 patterns. There are several good photos available on Navsource that show the starboard side of BB-56 I used to get the pattern as correct as possible. The ship itself was plotted from Floating Drydock plans of BB-55 in 1942 and modified accordingly. I drew six versions of North Carolina throughout her wartime service life as well - all the class drawings I made are available here: http://shipbucket.com/drawings/search?c ... h+carolina I generally do not make portside profiles except in rare cases.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2018 1:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 5:33 pm
Posts: 304
Colosseum wrote:
I drew the color profile you've attached - it was drawn using photo references only, since (as far as I can tell) there are no decent schematics available that show the pattern, and the USN did not issue design patterns for Ms12mod as it did the Measure 31-32-33 patterns. There are several good photos available on Navsource that show the starboard side of BB-56 I used to get the pattern as correct as possible. The ship itself was plotted from Floating Drydock plans of BB-55 in 1942 and modified accordingly. I drew six versions of North Carolina throughout her wartime service life as well - all the class drawings I made are available here: http://shipbucket.com/drawings/search?c ... h+carolina I generally do not make portside profiles except in rare cases.


Love your work man! Ok Can you specify - the tip top part of bow section is that haze grey or ocean grey?

Hard to tell but your drawings imply haze gray and I foind it hard to believe they used haze grey.

_________________
1/700 HMS Hood WIP
1/700 HMS Prince of Wales WIP


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2018 9:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 4:59 pm
Posts: 155
Location: Austin, TX
Apparently in 2014 when I drew it, I made the judgment that the bow section was 5-H Haze Grey (though now I'd probably leave it as 5-O). From reading this forum, it seems like it wasn't unheard of for some ships to paint the Ms12mod pattern outside regulations (and this seems to have included carrying 5-H into areas that shouldn't have had it, etc).

From consulting photos again (especially this one), I think I need to go revisit that area of the drawing and change it from 5-H to 5-O. I'm not sure why I originally thought that area was lighter... maybe a comment in this thread somewhere? Either way - the tone of the bow panel matches the tone of the No.1 turret so I think it's definitely 5-O. Interesting to note is the way the 5-N on the hull seems to curve upwards between the two forward turrets.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2018 8:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 5:33 pm
Posts: 304
Colosseum wrote:
Apparently in 2014 when I drew it, I made the judgment that the bow section was 5-H Haze Grey (though now I'd probably leave it as 5-O). From reading this forum, it seems like it wasn't unheard of for some ships to paint the Ms12mod pattern outside regulations (and this seems to have included carrying 5-H into areas that shouldn't have had it, etc).

From consulting photos again (especially this one), I think I need to go revisit that area of the drawing and change it from 5-H to 5-O. I'm not sure why I originally thought that area was lighter... maybe a comment in this thread somewhere? Either way - the tone of the bow panel matches the tone of the No.1 turret so I think it's definitely 5-O. Interesting to note is the way the 5-N on the hull seems to curve upwards between the two forward turrets.


It all makes sense though, doesnt it? The camo is inspired by rough seas and gray sky. So you got some high waves on front somewhere. Really like this camo a lot more than MS22. Thanks for making that drawing, it helps me in my modelling, wish there was another side and turrets. Turrets should not be colored on top as deck blue btw.

_________________
1/700 HMS Hood WIP
1/700 HMS Prince of Wales WIP


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 7:50 am
Posts: 13
Can anyone please inform me about BB-56 USS WASHINGTON fire control radars that were installed on the MK-38 Gun Directors in late 1942.

According to the following links,
the forward and the aft MK-38 directors carry the early MK-3 Mod.1 radar in August 1942
http://navsource.org/archives/01/056/015610.jpg
http://navsource.org/archives/01/056/015610a.jpg
https://www.navsource.org/archives/01/015626.jpg

Now in November, the forward MK-38 carries the MK-3 Mod.2 radar but what about the fire control radar on the aft MK-38?
It appears to be a MK-8 Mod.0 fire control radar? Is this correct?
Can anyone explain when MK-8 Mod.0 FC radars were installed on ships or on the BB-56?
http://navsource.org/archives/01/056/015673b.jpg

I appreciate for the response.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 1:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:15 pm
Posts: 108
Location: Clovis, CA
I think the photo you reference last is much later than November 1942. The Navsource caption for the photo only states it is after the November 13 battle, but not how much after. There are two other things in the photo to look at that would indicate a much later date. First she now has quad 40 mm guns in place of the 1.1 inch AA guns and second the demarcation line for the 5N paint on the lower hull curves down so that it runs below the anchor. From August 1942 to after the November battle the 5N line ran through the anchor and she was armed with 1.1 inch mounts and not 40 mm. I think the radar she had in August 1942 was still the same in November 1942.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 456 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group