The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 4:18 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:03 pm
Posts: 272
Location: Plymouth UK
tjstoneman wrote:
PENELOPE's brown and white scheme is also explained in Ed Gordon H.M.S. "Pepperpot!": The "Penelope" in World War Two (Robert Hale Ltd: 15 Aug 1985). According to Alan Raven, she wore a multi coloured scheme BEFORE she grounded in April, thus TWO different types of camouflage within two months.



Having just read through the HMS Pepperpot book first chapter, which covers from being in the Med to getting back to the Clyde for repairs mid May 40, it seems to me that the Alan Raven quote needs to be interpreted carefully. After sailing from Scapa on 7th April, Penelope was employed in open waters against the larger German units before first going closer inshore on 10th April as part of the back up to the RN destroyers attacking the German units in Narvik at dawn and she was then involved with the aftermath of that and then being told to prepare to lead the next attack into Narvik which she said couldn't be ready until the 12th. Before that went any further on the 11th she was sent to follow up reports of German support ships and grounded at 1441. The damage was so extensive that she could barely stay afloat let alone move without assistance and in military terms all she could do was very limited AA in self defence until temporarily patched sufficiently to be towed back to UK. The Alan Raven bit about "lulls in the fighting etc" doesn't seem to match the actual situation at all - there was no period then where an air threat close inshore had developed and I doubt Penelope dropped her anchor until the passage to "Cripples Creek" had completed. It is also thrown into question by the three photos in the Pepperpot book clearly showing the port side with the pattern used in the WEM print plus two shots close to while afloat (and listing) and being repaired for tow. It seems to me any shot taken in drydock after this adds nothing new apart from maybe showing the starboard side and can only be the scheme depicted by WEM anyway.

The Pepperpot account is specific about the brown and white colours for the makeshift scheme and it being varied as the time progressed and the snow on the hills melted. It would be interesting to know more about the likely paint stocks carried onboard at the time - perhaps some of our heavyweight camouflage experts could comment - as a complete repaint of the ship would require considerable stocks well beyond that needed for touching up weather damage etc. Perhaps the raw materials to make up white and brown were already available onboard as they were used in other colours? Otherwise did they get paint from the Norwegians that were assisting with all the ships at Skjelfjord. If the answer is no to both, then you are left starting to think that whatever Penelope was wearing when she sailed from Scapa must have been quite similar to what is shown in the WEM print. But that seems so much of a one-off and very different from other depictions of the Scapa Flotta scheme that it is hard to accept - the scheme reported by Alan Raven seems more likely but doesn't fit his narrative.

It would be very interesting to clarify what scheme Penelope had on sailing from Scapa as that would be how she was on the afternoon of 10th April and at an important what-if point in naval history when a decision for Penelope to promptly reattack the german destroyers at Narvik could have considerably changed how the Norwegian campaign developed.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 11:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2017 9:46 am
Posts: 1439
Location: Montreal, Canada
Assuming IF Penelope was wearing the Flotta Scheme, which contained brown and white (and light gray, light green, and black) up until being grounded, could the grays, greens, and black have been overpainted with more white leaving only the brown and white areas as pictured?
:wave_1:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 11:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2017 9:46 am
Posts: 1439
Location: Montreal, Canada
If an argument can be made that Penelope had been repainted in Home Fleet Gray before leaving Scapa, then wouldn't a temporary scheme of white over the gray have been more appropriate than white and brown against the backdrop of the steep bare-sided cliffs of the Norwegian fiords? Just trying to rule out the possibility of the Home Fleet Gray scheme.
:wave_1:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 10:38 pm 
From what I can understand, Aurora’s 1945 fit was primarily due to her 1943 refit. At the end of Aerthusa’s 1944 repair/refit, was she very similar to Aurora’s fit with the exception quad 40s replacing the quad 2 pounders? Where can I find a resource for Arethusa's 1944 fit? Thanks, Rich


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:23 am
Posts: 3689
Location: Bonn
Regarding the camouflage of Penelope in 1940: a photo in HMS Pepperpot shows that the light colour (white) was added before she got the heavy list, because the dirt is clearly over the light colour. This indicates the camouflage was NOT applied during the repairs, but before. But when? Still in Scapa Flow? Could it be an experimental camouflage for coastal areas, perhaps even both for winter in Scapa Flow (is there snow??) and in Norway...

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2018 5:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:15 am
Posts: 637
Location: England
I'm Building Flyhawk's HMS Penelope, prior to the Norwegian campaign. Was the catapult telescopic and which is the correct aircraft for her in the first few months of the war, the Seafox or Walrus?

thanks
Mike


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2018 1:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:33 am
Posts: 419
According to Theo Ballance The Squadrons and Units of the Fleet Air Arm (Tonbridge: Air-Britain, 2016), she carried an EIIIH catapult from completion until it was removed during her repairs after the Norwegian campaign (August 1940). The "E" means extendible.

She was allocated one Seafox (serial K8588) throughout.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2018 5:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:15 am
Posts: 637
Location: England
Thanks Tim. I thought it must be, otherwise they wouldn't have been able to turn it on either beam.

thanks
Mike


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2020 7:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 5:21 pm
Posts: 99
Location: Puck, Poland
Hi guys,
I was thinking about buying HMS Aurora and backdating it to 1944 landing in southern France or maybe even further back in time, but I can't find any sources on how Aurora looked like back then. Links on the first page of this topic aren't very precise either.

Are changes in light AA the only ones to occur on Aurora in the last year of war? And what would her camouflage be in 1944? I absolutely love Admiralty Standard Scheme, but I don't think Aurora could be painted that way during operation Dragoon.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jun 14, 2020 9:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 7:19 am
Posts: 325
Location: Washington, DC
All:

Flyhawk's 1/700 HMS Penelope kit has the 4" HA AA gun deck atop the aft deckhouse covered entirely with wooden planks. See here (scroll down):

https://toylandhobbymodelingmagazine.pr ... ll-review/

But most, if not all RN cruisers from this period had steel decks atop their aft deckhouses, with just the working areas around any AA guns there covered by wood planking. See, for instance, these pictures of HMAS Sydney: https://www.navy.gov.au/hmas-sydney-ii-part-5 (scroll down a bit to get to the photos).

Norman Ough's plans of HMS Penelope seem to show the deck covered completely by wooden planks (though it is hard to tell here):

https://www.vintagemodelplans.com/produ ... io-control

But this Norman Ough model held by the IWM shows the aft deckhouse covered by a steel AA deck, painted in dark gray:

https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/30018157

So would anyone have any photos or reliable plans of HMS Penelope that could clarify this matter?

Any assistance in this matter would be greatly appreciated, as I hoped that the Flyhawk HMS Penelope would be a quick build, but as usual, complications quickly pile up... sigh, LOL!

Thanks!

Mike E.

_________________
Mike E.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 8:35 am 
Fivi_1241 wrote:
Hi guys,
I was thinking about buying HMS Aurora and backdating it to 1944 landing in southern France or maybe even further back in time, but I can't find any sources on how Aurora looked like back then. Links on the first page of this topic aren't very precise either.

Are changes in light AA the only ones to occur on Aurora in the last year of war? And what would her camouflage be in 1944? I absolutely love Admiralty Standard Scheme, but I don't think Aurora could be painted that way during operation Dragoon.


So, the best I can do is point you to this link.

https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item ... 1060020124

Aurora was part of Operation Slapstick, the allies occupation of Taranto, and was a cameraship for a assigned film crew. There is something like 30 mins of footage that you can comb through that may give you the camoflauge pattern aurora wore in 1943.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2022 4:36 pm 
Hello to all the Royal Navy fans.

British ships are known to have been painted three different colors below the waterline during WW2: gray, black and red. However, it is unclear when and what color was every particular ship painted. Therefore, I would like to ask if anyone can confirm exactly what color was HMS Aurora painted below the waterline as of 1945. I need this info to paint the model of said ship by Flyhawk.

Thank you in advance.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2022 8:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2021 11:52 am
Posts: 157
Guest,

You might like to read the attachment to Dick's 8.58am Post of December 2020 on the "RN Ships' bottoms and boot-topping 1914 1950" thread as a starter on this one.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 6:21 am
Posts: 60
Location: Sydney
Hi all fans

Did HMS Aurora have pom-pom director and type 282 radar? don't think Flyhalk models these parts in its 1945 version.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 10:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 8:34 am
Posts: 124
Location: Perth Western Australia
Hi HJ1985
I have a few Wright & Logan photos of her entering Portsmouth in 1945, their good close ups from various angles and I cant see any pom-pom director and type 282

Graham


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 12:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 6:21 am
Posts: 60
Location: Sydney
graham wrote:
Hi HJ1985
I have a few Wright & Logan photos of her entering Portsmouth in 1945, their good close ups from various angles and I cant see any pom-pom director and type 282

Graham


Thank you Graham, this is really helpful. Avagoodweekend!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 12:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 6:21 am
Posts: 60
Location: Sydney
DavidP wrote:
https://www.world-war.co.uk/Arethusa/arethusa_class.php
https://www.world-war.co.uk/Arethusa/aurora.php


Thank you David. I did come across these photos earlier, but none of them gave enough close-ups for a definite answer.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group