The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:43 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 31, 2013 5:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:21 am
Posts: 125
Location: New Zealand
Hi,

I'm going to make a start on my Battle of Coronel Combrig trio of HMS Monmouth, Good Hope and Glasgow, with the first, but am quite baffled by the various armament fits quoted for Monmouth. The fourteen 6" make perfect sense but when it comes to the 12-pdrs and 3-pdrs things become hazy especially if plans for HMS Kent in the Friedman book are consulted. I can see the two pairs of 12-pdrs in the fore and aft ports and the six, three per side, on the main deck - but what about those forward on the main deck and possibly some on the rear superstructure as shown by David Griffith in his ship models book (but not in Friedman's plan of HMS Kent)?

Can anyone please help me with the disposition of the 'light' guns (including any machine guns/maxims) for Monmouth as carried in 1914? It is the usual problem I face when ship modelling (as opposed to making aircraft)- a real struggle for good references that show what I'm looking for.

Many thanks and a very Happy New Year to all ship modelers out there!

Cheers,

GrahamB


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 12:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:23 am
Posts: 3689
Location: Bonn
Her armament was:

14 x 6" (15,2 cm)
10 x 12-pounder (7,62 cm) (according to Friedman only 8 !?)
3 x 3-pounder (4,7 cm)

I see these 12-pounders:
6 midships on upper deck level
2 upper deck level embrasures (bow)
2 main deck level embrasures (stern)

The 3-pounders are difficult to see. According to the plans they are:
2 forecastle level, behind 6" casemate
2 on the upper level of the midship bulwark, on small deckhouse, between first two funnels.

The problem is that there are more 3-pounders on the plans compared to list of her armament!

According to Friedman's plan there are two Maxim machine guns at the after end of the superstructure, which are impossible to see on the photos, which I have.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 4:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:21 am
Posts: 125
Location: New Zealand
Hi Maxim,

thanks for this - and you have also pointed out the anomalies between the quoted armament and what can be seen on plans (such as for Kent). I think that David Griffith's model of Kent shows what might be 12pdrs on the rear superstructure - where the Maxims are shown in the Friedman plans. Still, there was 11 years for modifications and changes to the initial secondary and tertiary armament but finding good photographs of the 1914 period is the issue.

I'll press on anyway - my first Combrig kit.

Cheers,

GrahamB


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 4:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:23 am
Posts: 3689
Location: Bonn
Do you have found photos with a gun above the rear 6" casemates?

In Ships of the World History of British cruisers is a photo of Essex in 1912-14 (p. 56), which appear to have a 3-pounder there (not bulwarks there!). In the same book is a photo of Cumberland (p. 59) - also without bulwarks there and there appear to be a small gun to the rear of the search light above the rear 6" casemates. But it is difficult to see.

I found somewhere a photo of Cumberland in 1913 in Malta, which also have a gun there, which could be a 12-pounder. But the photo is very small. Kent in 1914 appear to have no gun there (see here). There is a search light at the position of the gun on David's model. I also cannot see a gun there on this early photo of Cumberland (only perhaps a 3-pounder next to the forward funnel).

The most obvious difference between the ships as completed and in 1914 are probably the spotting tops and the high topmasts. I would expect bigger changes of the armament to have happened latter in First World War.

I have started to built HMS Monmouth and I would like to depict her in 1914, therefore I am searching for similar information.

Later I would like to built a modified ship, e.g. HMS Donegal (p. 288 in Friedman) with dazzle pattern and the 6" guns moved to the upper deck.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 16, 2014 11:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:21 am
Posts: 125
Location: New Zealand
Hi Maxim,

I've not yet found a photo showing the rear superstructure guns (should keep looking) - the HMS Kent example was only David Griffith's model. Yes, searchlights are in the most aft position but there is 3pdr? on each side just above the 6" casement. I agree that the fighting tops is the main consideration for 1914 compared to as-built.

I'd love to do some of the armoured cruisers in their dazzle too - King Alfred is a great example (Combrig Good Hope or Leviathan kit) - but the original colour dazzle plans/schemes are held by the IWM and most are not viewable on-line. Those for the older cruiser HMS Highflyer are - wow, what a pattern! Someone has those of HMS Cochrane and Duke of Edinburgh (same pattern) photographed and these can be seen on line though - no kits unfortunately.

Good luck with your build.

Cheers,

GrahamB


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:23 am
Posts: 3689
Location: Bonn
3-pounders were probably easy to move, also indicated be the discrepancy of the number of assigned guns and the possible number of gun positions according to the plans and photos.

The guns I have seen on photos were actually at the most aft position, similar to the position of the Maxim machine guns on the plan in Friedman's book. Above the aft 6" casemates probably the search lights were located, e.g. visible on the linked photo of Kent in 1914.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 6:53 pm
Posts: 232
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Hi,

Here are some shots of a model of HMS Kent that was at the Granville Island Sport Fishing Model Ships and Trains Museum, which is now closed.

Attachment:
Vancouver HMS Kent 01s.jpg
Vancouver HMS Kent 01s.jpg [ 132.82 KiB | Viewed 2455 times ]


Attachment:
Vancouver HMS Kent 02s.jpg
Vancouver HMS Kent 02s.jpg [ 139.7 KiB | Viewed 2455 times ]


Attachment:
Vancouver HMS Kent 03s.jpg
Vancouver HMS Kent 03s.jpg [ 137.41 KiB | Viewed 2455 times ]


Attachment:
Vancouver HMS Kent 04s.jpg
Vancouver HMS Kent 04s.jpg [ 120.44 KiB | Viewed 2455 times ]


Attachment:
Vancouver HMS Kent 05s.jpg
Vancouver HMS Kent 05s.jpg [ 128.78 KiB | Viewed 2455 times ]


Attachment:
Vancouver HMS Kent 06s.jpg
Vancouver HMS Kent 06s.jpg [ 137.04 KiB | Viewed 2455 times ]


While not a builders model, it is very well done.

Cheers,
George


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 2:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:23 am
Posts: 3689
Location: Bonn
Thank you for the photos!

There are also no light guns on the after superstructure. Are the ones next to the forward two funnels correct? Especially the one next to the middle funnel?

It is interesting that there are a lot of models of the Drake class and County class featuring the Victorian painting scheme, whereas I have only seen photos of some of the real ships, which had this during their trials (with incomplete armament). The RN switched to grey camouflage about the time these two classes were built.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 6:53 pm
Posts: 232
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Here is HMS Kent in grey. HMS Kent at HMCS Naden, the training base for HMCS Esquimalt just west of Victoria B.C., is a hand made model representing the ship after her repairs from the Battle of the Falklands. Once again a different representation of the small arms.

Attachment:
HMS Kent at Naden 03s.jpg
HMS Kent at Naden 03s.jpg [ 137.19 KiB | Viewed 2401 times ]


Attachment:
HMS Kent at Naden 04s.jpg
HMS Kent at Naden 04s.jpg [ 133.56 KiB | Viewed 2401 times ]


Attachment:
HMS Kent at Naden 06s.jpg
HMS Kent at Naden 06s.jpg [ 120.75 KiB | Viewed 2401 times ]


Attachment:
HMS Kent at Naden 07s.jpg
HMS Kent at Naden 07s.jpg [ 107.18 KiB | Viewed 2401 times ]


Attachment:
HMS Kent at Naden 08s.jpg
HMS Kent at Naden 08s.jpg [ 126.16 KiB | Viewed 2401 times ]


Attachment:
HMS Kent at Naden 11s.jpg
HMS Kent at Naden 11s.jpg [ 125.44 KiB | Viewed 2401 times ]


Attachment:
HMS Kent at Naden 13s.jpg
HMS Kent at Naden 13s.jpg [ 125.33 KiB | Viewed 2401 times ]


Attachment:
HMS Kent at Naden 17s.jpg
HMS Kent at Naden 17s.jpg [ 138.32 KiB | Viewed 2401 times ]


Cheers,
George


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 8:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:21 am
Posts: 125
Location: New Zealand
Hi George,

these photos of Kent are wonderful and very helpful - many thanks for posting them. It is amazing what is out there in the form of large-scale models. I remember there were at least two of these builder's models at my naval boarding school in England but I can't recall (after 40 years) what they were.

At least my Monmouth is out of the box now and about to receive her bath in soapy water before I get on with building/painting.

Cheers,

GrahamB


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group