The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 4:35 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 126 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 6:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:46 am
Posts: 786
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Quote:

I believe I can answer this one for you:

The starboard transverse torpedo tube was located between frames 83 and 85, and the port torpedo tube between frames 85 and 87, where the foremast is located. Port always forward of the starboard tubes, as in the battleships of the German navy.

I believe these tubes were mounted at right angles to the longitudinal axis, as opposed to the battleships where they were mounted at a 20deg angle. The depth (centreline) of the tubes was about 1.80 metres below the waterline.

The Revell model of Emden/Dresden got it almost right, I think these were based on drawings Peter Günter Huff. On these drawings there is a skin doubler shown around the oval torpedo tube lids, however at Revell these doublers were interpreted as recesses instead. The solution is to make a small plate in the shape of the recess, with an oval hole in it, and cement this into the recess, and then file this plate then in line with the skin, leaving only a slight step for showing the doubler. The lids themselves are then correctly recessed.

Hope this info helps!


Hope this answers


Hi Maarten, your answer is very complex and demonstrates your deep knowledge of the ship.
I'm copying your answer in my computer to analize it with plans that I'm about to receive. That is very difficulty for me to understand the locations of the frames ( without drawings of the hull lines...) , but now you are clarifying that for me.
Thank you very much for your kind answer, and I hope it can be useful to mate mermaid too.
Nice regards: Jimmy

_________________
Make your influence positive!

"Oh Lord thy sea is so great and my boat is so small."
Breton Fisherman's Prayer


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:46 am
Posts: 786
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Maarten Schönfeld wrote:
Hi Jimmy,


I believe I can answer this one for you:

The starboard transverse torpedo tube was located between frames 83 and 85, and the port torpedo tube between frames 85 and 87, where the foremast is located. Port always forward of the starboard tubes, as in the battleships of the German navy.

I believe these tubes were mounted at right angles to the longitudinal axis, as opposed to the battleships where they were mounted at a 20deg angle. The depth (centreline) of the tubes was about 1.80 metres below the waterline.

The Revell model of Emden/Dresden got it almost right, I think these were based on drawings Peter Günter Huff. On these drawings there is a skin doubler shown around the oval torpedo tube lids, however at Revell these doublers were interpreted as recesses instead. The solution is to make a small plate in the shape of the recess, with an oval hole in it, and cement this into the recess, and then file this plate then in line with the skin, leaving only a slight step for showing the doubler. The lids themselves are then correctly recessed.

Hope this info helps!


Hope this answers


Maarten, please, I have another question, if you can help again:
this disposition of the torpedo tubes were similar in both ships?
I consider that the only major diference between the sisters were motorization and the four propellers in Dresden.

Thanks: Jimmy

_________________
Make your influence positive!

"Oh Lord thy sea is so great and my boat is so small."
Breton Fisherman's Prayer


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:46 am
Posts: 786
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
peppe wrote:
in the plan i have (hamecher 1996 - kassel) the torpedo tubes room is between frame 74 and 80, right in front of first boiler room and the tubes are little inclined, in bow direction, more or less 20°
ciao peppe


Hi peppe, thanks for your answer too, I sent you some PM and mail. :wave_1:
Nice regards: Jimmy

_________________
Make your influence positive!

"Oh Lord thy sea is so great and my boat is so small."
Breton Fisherman's Prayer


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 7:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:44 pm
Posts: 1775
Location: Herk-de-Stad, Belgium
Hi Jimmy & others,

As you asked for the exact position of the torpedo tubes, I tried to formulate my answer as exact as it could be! Therefore the reference to the frames, which is the generally accepted method in shipbuilding to indicate a position in a ship. But yes, it assumes you have an insight where those frames are located! And normally you need a drawing for that, showing the hull frames and their positions...

Well, there is one thing that helps here: by coincidence (!) these little German cruisers of the Kaiserliche Marine happened to have a fixed frame spacing of exactly one metre. This means that frame 85 is exactly 85 metres forward of the stern, the extreme rear part of the hull.

Converting this measure to your preferred scale shouldn't be that difficult, I suppose.

Does this solve your question?

(And a further note for the whizkids here: this way of measuring is different from the RN or other navies, in those the rudder axis is called the Aft Perpendicular and frame positions are measured from this point forward. In German vessels the aft perpendicular ("hintere Lot" in german) is the stern or the rearmost frame in in, and the rudder post is almost invariably postioned at Frame 7 - I haven't encountered any exceptions to that rule yet.
However, the frame spacings differ: while the cruisers have their frames with an interval of 1 metre, the battleships were designed with fixed frame spacings of 1.2 metres, and small vessels (the Gorch Fock) having 60 cm frame spacings. But always uniform throughout the ship, and not variable, as was the case with RN ships. )

_________________
"I've heard there's a wicked war a-blazing, and the taste of war I know so very well
Even now I see the foreign flag a-raising, their guns on fire as we sail into hell"
Roger Whittaker +9/13/2023


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:01 am
Posts: 1645
Location: Corvallis, Oregon, USA
Here is some information for comparison.

In the US Navy frames are numbered from the bow to the stern. Frame 0 is the Fore Peak where the leading edge of the stem cuts the water. Therefore, frames forward of the waterline on an overhanging bow have negative numbers (-1, -2, etc.). The After Peak is the point where the aftmost part of the stern cuts the water. On overhanging sterns the frame numbers continue past the Aft Peak.

The Fore Peak and Aft Peak are the "perpendiculars" and you will see the hull length specified as "between perpendiculars" (at the waterline) and "overall" (from the forwardmost tip of the bow to the aftmost overhang of the stern.

Frame numbering is typically at four foot intervals - I think this applies to all modern ships, but I am not certain. However, ships were sometimes constructed with half frames spaced between full frames. These half frames sometimes were constructed only below the waterline.

Phil

_________________
A collision at sea will ruin your entire day. Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:44 pm
Posts: 1775
Location: Herk-de-Stad, Belgium
Hi Phil,

Thank you very much for the addition! (although I'm afraid we're veering a bit off topic..., maybe we will get relocated to a more convenient forum.)

I'm leafing through a number of plans I have of USN vessels, and you're quite correct. Maybe because I've got some older plans (USS Midway f.i. in this case), the frames ahead of 'fore peak' (FP or Forward Perpendicular) are called here A, B, C etc. instead of having negative numbers.

While the Midway indeed has 4 ft frame spacing, I found some other vessels having 3 ft spacing, or even varying frame spacing, but always very neatly indicated. My experience with RN ships is you have to solve quite a puzzle whate actual frame spacings were used, designers increasing or decreasing the interval around turrets or in boiler rooms as they felt appropriate.

Having half frames in between seems to be a quite common practice, also with the German Kaiserliche Marine and others.

_________________
"I've heard there's a wicked war a-blazing, and the taste of war I know so very well
Even now I see the foreign flag a-raising, their guns on fire as we sail into hell"
Roger Whittaker +9/13/2023


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:01 am
Posts: 1645
Location: Corvallis, Oregon, USA
Maarten,

You are correct about the frames forward of the Fore Peak being lettered. I guess I just had one of those teen age moments.

Also, after thinking about it I recalled thet the US Fletcher class destroyers had a frame spacing of 21 inches. So you really need good plans to be able to locate features by frame numbers.

Phil

_________________
A collision at sea will ruin your entire day. Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:46 am
Posts: 786
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Hi Maarten and Phil:
I thank you both very much for kind replies, that now I feel able to locate the torpedo tubes for SMS Emden. :wave_1:

And yes, I got some drawings.

Regards: Jimmy

_________________
Make your influence positive!

"Oh Lord thy sea is so great and my boat is so small."
Breton Fisherman's Prayer


Last edited by Jimmy Conway on Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:46 am
Posts: 786
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
mermaid wrote:
Jimmy Conway wrote:
SMS Emden ( Emden I , 1908 ) and sister Dresden were armed with two torpedo tubes of 450mm that are said to be submerged.
Does anybody please know the exact locations of these tubes? :wave_1:

Thanks: Jimmy



Yes, an important question for a full hull build. Me too, joining the question.


And you, Mermaid, is that clear for you?

Regards: Jimmy

_________________
Make your influence positive!

"Oh Lord thy sea is so great and my boat is so small."
Breton Fisherman's Prayer


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:31 pm
Posts: 892
Location: Flensburg, Germany
And I thought frames on overhanging stern/bow (outside the perpendiculars, the forward one is the one cutting the CWL, the aft one is the one in the middle of the rudder trunk, cutting the CWL) having negative numbers is a German thing. At least we have a word for it: 'Minusspant(en)' ('minus' frames) ...

Happy modelling ~ Olaf!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 2:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:30 pm
Posts: 214
Jimmy Conway wrote:
Quote:

I believe I can answer this one for you:

The starboard transverse torpedo tube was located between frames 83 and 85, and the port torpedo tube between frames 85 and 87, where the foremast is located. Port always forward of the starboard tubes, as in the battleships of the German navy.

I believe these tubes were mounted at right angles to the longitudinal axis, as opposed to the battleships where they were mounted at a 20deg angle. The depth (centreline) of the tubes was about 1.80 metres below the waterline.

The Revell model of Emden/Dresden got it almost right, I think these were based on drawings Peter Günter Huff. On these drawings there is a skin doubler shown around the oval torpedo tube lids, however at Revell these doublers were interpreted as recesses instead. The solution is to make a small plate in the shape of the recess, with an oval hole in it, and cement this into the recess, and then file this plate then in line with the skin, leaving only a slight step for showing the doubler. The lids themselves are then correctly recessed.

Hope this info helps!


Hope this answers


Hi Maarten, your answer is very complex and demonstrates your deep knowledge of the ship.
I'm copying your answer in my computer to analize it with plans that I'm about to receive. That is very difficulty for me to understand the locations of the frames ( without drawings of the hull lines...) , but now you are clarifying that for me.
Thank you very much for your kind answer, and I hope it can be useful to mate mermaid too.
Nice regards: Jimmy

Thanks, Maarten and Jimmy ! So on the model that should be represented as a closed circilar opening? It is not quite clear if it should be showing the angle by protruding off the hull or opposite.
How is your model advancing, Jimmy? I am looking forward to see it so there will be less questions left. What guise are you going to portray it? With the false stack or without?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 1:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:44 pm
Posts: 1775
Location: Herk-de-Stad, Belgium
Hi,

The torpedo tube aperture should look something like this:
Attachment:
SMS_Ostfriesland_A-05-07_stbdbow-TT.jpg
SMS_Ostfriesland_A-05-07_stbdbow-TT.jpg [ 91.51 KiB | Viewed 2704 times ]
. This example is from SMS Ostfriesland, and will be slightly larger than on the cruisers: 50 cm torpedo's instead of 45 cm.

Not circular, but oval with square topcorners, and slightly recessed. Note also the reinforcing skin doubler, which was mistaken by Revell as being part of the recess.

_________________
"I've heard there's a wicked war a-blazing, and the taste of war I know so very well
Even now I see the foreign flag a-raising, their guns on fire as we sail into hell"
Roger Whittaker +9/13/2023


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:46 am
Posts: 786
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Maarten is it very similar to the Emden or the same equipment but only slightly larger?

Thnaks for posting the pic, it is magnificent. :thumbs_up_1:

Jimmy

_________________
Make your influence positive!

"Oh Lord thy sea is so great and my boat is so small."
Breton Fisherman's Prayer


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:44 pm
Posts: 1775
Location: Herk-de-Stad, Belgium
Hi Jimmy, Mermaid,

I'm convinced the torpedo apertures on the cruisers were entirely similar to those on Ostfriesland, only a touch smaller. The only difference I can see is that on Emden (and Dresden) the top corners of the doubler plate were cut off, instead of the bottom corners as in case of the Ostfriesland. This because the underlying skin plate situation was slightly different.

The Germans were pretty steadfast in repeating a good design over and over again in their ships...

_________________
"I've heard there's a wicked war a-blazing, and the taste of war I know so very well
Even now I see the foreign flag a-raising, their guns on fire as we sail into hell"
Roger Whittaker +9/13/2023


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:50 am
Posts: 352
Location: roma, italia
found somewhere in the net
ciao peppe


Attachments:
dsc00880800x600us4.jpg
dsc00880800x600us4.jpg [ 57.29 KiB | Viewed 2657 times ]
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:44 pm
Posts: 1775
Location: Herk-de-Stad, Belgium
Thanks Peppe!

See what I mean? Almost exactly as on the Ostfriesland.

_________________
"I've heard there's a wicked war a-blazing, and the taste of war I know so very well
Even now I see the foreign flag a-raising, their guns on fire as we sail into hell"
Roger Whittaker +9/13/2023


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 11:11 am
Posts: 62
Coming in late to the subject, recently picked up the Revell Emden and am eager to amass all the research and aftermarket details nessisary to get the job done. Is there any aftermarket details currently available? I noted Gold Medal being mentioned some posts, and years back, are such still available?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 3:18 pm
Posts: 624
Location: Palm Beach, Fla
Been to the front page?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 11:11 am
Posts: 62
JCRAY wrote:
Been to the front page?

I must be missing something? If you mean the first page of this thread, yes, I saw mentions of various things, but as those posts were five years old, I wondered about new/better/different?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Posts: 12144
Location: Ottawa, Canada
He might be referring to the front page of Modelwarships.com, where all the banners are, including the one for GMM and various online vendors. In any case, I do believe that the GMM set is still in production and can be attained relatively painlessly :)

_________________
De quoi s'agit-il?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 126 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 121 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group