The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Thu Apr 25, 2024 7:24 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 708 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 36  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10454
Location: EG48
THat's a little different from this one posted elsewhere:

Richard Durham wrote:
Just peeled the plastic off Trumpeter’s new 1/700 NEW ORLEANS. I was pretty excited about a 1/700 Treaty Cruiser in plastic and not resin! That said, a quick inspection of the kit parts shows that the hull, superstructure and most weapons are crudely molded, oversized and look almost toy like. Some parts are so poorly molded that you would almost suspect a problem with the molding process. Lots of flash, all gun shields are ridiculously thick and the boats are laughable. The 20 mm, 40 mm (I think they are supposed to be quad 40s) and quad 1.1 guns are the worst that I have ever seen. At first blush the main deck pieces, cranes, main turrets and 5 inch guns look OK. Sorry Trumpeter, but Yuck.

How can a company that produced such a beautiful 1/350 HMS HOOD (built it for the last IPMS Nationals) produce something like this. I have also built their 1/700 NORTH CAROLINA and WASHINGTON and despite the poor superstructure fit up, were OK overall. I have always suspected that Trumpeter had a couple of different teams that design and mold their kit, now I am sure of it, and this kit was clearly produced by the “C” team. For the price of this kit and state of the art recently displayed by Tamiya and Hasegawa, we had the right to expect more from this kit.

I hate to be harsh, but this kit is a disappointment. Rich

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 8179
Location: New Jersey
I saw the NO Boat in the box recently, and while I don't think it's as bad as the copy Richard got, my opinion was it wasn't as nice as the Tamiya Indianapolis, which is the standard for injection molded USN cruiser - IMO.

_________________
Martin

"Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." John Wayne

Ship Model Gallery


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 8179
Location: New Jersey
Some NO Class info that I found while surfing the web...the pictures of the pre-war CA-44 are especially nice:

CA-44 Photos:
http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/us ... photo.html
http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/us ... photo.html
http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/us ... photo.html
http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/us ... photo.html
http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/us ... photo.html
http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/us ... photo.html

Motion Models CA-44:
http://www.motionmodels.com/ships/cc/ca44.html

Says to be a shot of CA-44’s camo, but I believe it’s CA-39.
http://sortingoutscience.net/photos/gro ... cheme.html

CA-39 Photos:
http://www.ussquincy.com/quincyws121200/39_photos.html

Astoria pictures:
http://www.caroleestrup.com/frankjamesmorgan.html

_________________
Martin

"Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." John Wayne

Ship Model Gallery


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 9:10 am 
I (aka Steve) trust Martin's comments about the Tamiya Indianapolis and will purchase this kit soonest. I have a number of older Tamiya kits and they have stood the test of time - HMS Hood for example. The New Orleans is IMHO the best USN cruiser kit compared to the Atlantas, Baltimores and Clevelands currently on the market.

Dan - Has the Maya hull fix kept it's shape?


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 2:08 pm 
Online

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8577
Location: New York City
Steve, the Maya hull has retained 99% of the fix. Pretty good.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:54 pm
Posts: 254
Location: Milwaukie, OR
So I'm ready to paint my 1/350 San Fran. Was she in Ms. 11 or 21 for the Nov 13 battle?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2411
Location: Hoboken, NJ
5-N vertical surfaces, with 20-B horizontal. Measure 21.

_________________
We like our history sanitized and theme-parked and self-congratulatory, not bloody and angry and unflattering. - Jonathan Yardley


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: CA-38 hanger deck
PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:39 pm 
I beeen looking over my plans of the CA-37 & 38. I think the hanger deck was steel and not covered with wood, does anyone really know which it is. I can't tell from photos due to clearity. Also would the hanger deck be painted weather deck blue or deck gray during war time. I this this has been covered for CV's but CA's, Thank you, Keith


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: CA-38 hanger deck
PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 9:41 am
Posts: 2207
Location: Monson, MA.
Hi Keith:

I believe the hangar deck was steel, and was painted in weather deck blue.


Bob Pink.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: CA-38 hanger deck
PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2411
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Gary Kingzette is the person you want to ask. I know he had questions during his current build of San Fran regarding several details about the hangar area in general, but was able to resolve most of them.

Just to clarify, when you say hangar deck, you mean the deck inside the hangar structure, not the weather deck where the catapults are mounted, correct?

_________________
We like our history sanitized and theme-parked and self-congratulatory, not bloody and angry and unflattering. - Jonathan Yardley


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: CA-38 hanger deck
PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 2:07 pm 
Thank you, I think Bob has it right, steel inside. Wood was for splinter protection, Keith


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: CA-38 hanger deck
PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2411
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Has the splinter protection reason ever actually been proven with documentation? I personally think it's for traction when the decks are wet, and of course because it's pretty. We all know how big the Navy is on things that are pretty -- I'll never polish brass again!!!

_________________
We like our history sanitized and theme-parked and self-congratulatory, not bloody and angry and unflattering. - Jonathan Yardley


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 8179
Location: New Jersey
Before the original thread in the picture post forum is automatically pruned from the board, I'm re-posting there here:

http://www.njipms.org/images/SanFran01.jpg
http://www.njipms.org/images/SanFran02.jpg
http://www.njipms.org/images/SanFran03.jpg
http://www.njipms.org/images/SanFran04.jpg
http://www.njipms.org/images/SanFran05.jpg
http://www.njipms.org/images/SanFran06.jpg
http://www.njipms.org/images/SanFran07.jpg

_________________
Martin

"Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." John Wayne

Ship Model Gallery


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 10:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:54 pm
Posts: 254
Location: Milwaukie, OR
OOB build progress. Have another kit waiting on PE.

Finally got ahold of 5N Navy Blue. Almost ready to glue the deck to the hull.
Image

Had to scratch build the cats after FUBARing the kit cats trying to drill them out.
Image

Image

Still some work to do, but almost there!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 5:01 pm
Posts: 411
What brand of paint do you use? The 5-N on your San Fran looks much lighter than the ModelMaster 5-N that I have. In fact, it's nearly impossible to tell the difference between it and the 20-B Deck Blue unless you look very closely.

_________________
On the ways:
1/350 AFV Club LST


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:54 pm
Posts: 254
Location: Milwaukie, OR
PollyScale.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 5:01 pm
Posts: 411
Thanks. I like yours better. I don't know if the contrast between the colors was wide or narrow in actuality, but it looks better visually with yours.
Is the deck blue Pollyscale as well?

_________________
On the ways:
1/350 AFV Club LST


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:54 pm
Posts: 254
Location: Milwaukie, OR
Yes.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 8179
Location: New Jersey
PeteM wrote:
What brand of paint do you use? The 5-N on your San Fran looks much lighter than the ModelMaster 5-N that I have. In fact, it's nearly impossible to tell the difference between it and the 20-B Deck Blue unless you look very closely.


In Wiper's Warship Pictorial #5, USS San Francisco, he says (on Page 24 & again on Page 29) that when SF emerged from her May, 1942 refit, she was painted Sea Blue (he does say it's possible it's 5N). I thought - based on what I've read elsewhere - that 5S had long been discontinued by this time (5/42)?

_________________
Martin

"Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." John Wayne

Ship Model Gallery


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2411
Location: Hoboken, NJ
I wonder if they just touched-up her paint if it was 5-S? Yorktown at that time was still in 5-S, and until her loss, but that was from being in the Atlantic the previous December and not having been in the yards for way too long.

_________________
We like our history sanitized and theme-parked and self-congratulatory, not bloody and angry and unflattering. - Jonathan Yardley


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 708 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 36  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 110 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group