The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 12:53 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 466 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 24  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:49 pm
Posts: 567
Location: Hilliard, Ohio
Tracy,

Were you able to watch that DVD I suggusted to you?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10454
Location: EG48
Finished it last night in fact. I have two screen shots, one of which I was going to post here for review... haven't had a chance to yet.

Good and informative show.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 6:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:09 pm
Posts: 15
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Hi all,

Hoping someone can help me out with a source for 1:72 scale plans. I'm looking at building a scratch built RC model of an Arleigh Burke destroyer and need a set of plans in 1:72. I was searching the net a few weeks ago and I'm sure I came across a company that had them in 1:72 but can't find the site again.

If anyone could steer me in the right direction for purchasing a set of 1:72 plans for Arleigh Burke I would be most gratefull.

Many thanks,
Garry.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Hangar
PostPosted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:54 pm
Posts: 36
Here's one shot.


Attachments:
DDG 91 Pinckney - General 22.jpg
DDG 91 Pinckney - General 22.jpg [ 268.71 KiB | Viewed 3231 times ]
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:54 pm
Posts: 36
Another.


Attachments:
DDG 91 Pinckney - General 21.jpg
DDG 91 Pinckney - General 21.jpg [ 222.86 KiB | Viewed 3205 times ]
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 7:15 am
Posts: 1204
Location: ATHENS, GREECE
I recently purchased Dragon's 1/350 USS Preble kit. Does the hanger need lengthening afterwards like the 1/700 kits?

I think that the heli deck is too long. But have not checked it thoroughly... Thanks... :wave_1:

_________________
NIKOS (NICK)
ΜΕΓΑ ΤΟ ΤΗΣ ΘΑΛΑΣΣΗΣ ΚΡΑΤΟΣ
(GREAT IS THE NATION THAT MASTERS THE SEAS)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 7:15 am
Posts: 1204
Location: ATHENS, GREECE
Well, I found out that the hanger is 16mm shorter than it should be, by my calculations...

Would anyone be interested in the differences between the Dragon USS Preble kit and the flight IIA Arkeigh Burke ships?

I decided to build the kit out of the box without any alterations and get myself an additional kit to correct...

Overall the dragon kit is good, with nice fitm except perhaps the mast and the way it is attached to the superstructure. There are some inaccuracies but no bigt deal...

_________________
NIKOS (NICK)
ΜΕΓΑ ΤΟ ΤΗΣ ΘΑΛΑΣΣΗΣ ΚΡΑΤΟΣ
(GREAT IS THE NATION THAT MASTERS THE SEAS)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Posts: 12144
Location: Ottawa, Canada
The propellers are also very wrong, if you're building her full hull.

_________________
De quoi s'agit-il?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 7:15 am
Posts: 1204
Location: ATHENS, GREECE
The props are a dissapointment...

I just finished the forward superstructure except painting, and all I can say is that the provided pe set does not provide enough rails and they are not the correct ones as well... Thank god for the spares box... :heh: :heh:

It is very impressive though... More of a cruiser rather than a destroyer... Funny they called it that...

Also in the kit are not provided the 25mm mounts and the machine guns...

_________________
NIKOS (NICK)
ΜΕΓΑ ΤΟ ΤΗΣ ΘΑΛΑΣΣΗΣ ΚΡΑΤΟΣ
(GREAT IS THE NATION THAT MASTERS THE SEAS)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: CIWS is Back
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:54 pm
Posts: 36
As of DDG 101, CIWS is back

Reference:
http://www.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=75942
http://navysite.de/dd/ddg101.htm

Look aft behind second stack, or whatever it's called. :heh:

It's not there on DDG 100
http://www.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=65963


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Posts: 12144
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Hmm, I was looking at pictures of Chung-Hoon (93) - it seems she was refitted with CIWS some time between Sept. 2007 and July 2008.

Sept 2007: http://www.navsource.org/archives/05/05019320.jpg
July 2008: http://www.navsource.org/archives/05/05016030.jpg

Perhaps they ran out of CIWSs during the new Burkes' constructions? Haha.

But I guess it might be to do with the recent piracy concerns.

_________________
De quoi s'agit-il?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:54 pm
Posts: 36
Good catch. I never thought of looking at previous ships too. So it must be a "retro fit" when any of them go back into the yards. But they are only adding aft? I guess forward is still ESSM via the VLS.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: CIWS is Back
PostPosted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:46 pm
Posts: 18
Tim Barron wrote:
As of DDG 101, CIWS is back

Reference:
http://www.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=75942
http://navysite.de/dd/ddg101.htm

Look aft behind second stack, or whatever it's called. :heh:

It's not there on DDG 100
http://www.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=65963


Interesting, but looking at pictures from navsource, it there doesn't appear a CIWS on 102 and after. :?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 12:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:54 pm
Posts: 36
You can see the top of it in this DDG 102 photo:
http://www.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=74826

And clearly in this one:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/specmode/3940132927/

The other thing I've noticed is that they aren't white anymore. Unless there is color illusion, they appear to be gray in any other photos too.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 7:15 am
Posts: 1204
Location: ATHENS, GREECE
All phalanx ciws are painted grey. And you will also notice that they have an extra antenna/tracker on one side...

Attachment:
05018444.jpg
05018444.jpg [ 111.49 KiB | Viewed 3150 times ]


This is DDG 84 Mediterranean Sea, March 24 2008, after installation of ciws both for and aft and a refit at the antenna configuration atop the bridge in 2007

_________________
NIKOS (NICK)
ΜΕΓΑ ΤΟ ΤΗΣ ΘΑΛΑΣΣΗΣ ΚΡΑΤΟΣ
(GREAT IS THE NATION THAT MASTERS THE SEAS)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:28 pm
Posts: 2126
Location: Egg Harbor Twp, NJ
DDG 95, James E Williams moored to breakwater pier at Rhodes, Greece in 2006. I've sent the over 1 meg original to Navsource.
Attachment:
DDG 95 James E. Williams at Rhodes 2006.jpg
DDG 95 James E. Williams at Rhodes 2006.jpg [ 87.73 KiB | Viewed 3128 times ]

Russ Moody

_________________
Russ


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 3:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Posts: 12144
Location: Ottawa, Canada
I just realized - did they remove the Harpoons from the FIIa ships? Or are they located somewhere else now?

_________________
De quoi s'agit-il?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 7:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 3125
Location: Hawaii
DavidP wrote:
i think they are in the vls as don't see them on any of the ships but shows armed with 8 harpoons according to navsource.


Harpoons are NOT VLS capable, at least the current models anyway. Some of the Burkes in the middle didn't get Harpoon or CIWS and not all were backfitted. You'll have to check ship specific photos and date stamps to be 100% sure.

_________________
Drawing Board:
1/700 Whiff USS Leyte and escorts 1984
1/700 Whiff USN Modernized CAs 1984
1/700 Whiff ASW Showdown - FFs vs SSGN 1984

Slipway:
1/700 Whiff USN ASW Hunter Killer Group Dio 1984


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 9:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 3121
Cliffy B wrote:
DavidP wrote:
i think they are in the vls as don't see them on any of the ships but shows armed with 8 harpoons according to navsource.


Harpoons are NOT VLS capable, at least the current models anyway. Some of the Burkes in the middle didn't get Harpoon or CIWS and not all were backfitted. You'll have to check ship specific photos and date stamps to be 100% sure.

Who wants to know the dirty secret why not all the Burkes have CIWS of some sort?

Blue Pill - Well, you'll just never know.


Red Pill - The Navy was hedging so many of its bets that ESSM was going to, in one swoop, make Phalanx and RAM obsolete, so the Navy quit ordering Phalanx units, and the assembly line was shut down. The line was re-tooled for other stuff, and only support parts were being manufactured.

ESSM failed over and over and over again for so long that 7, if I remember correctly maybe more, DDGs were completed without CIWS. When the Navy had enough of the promises, they paid to have the Phalanx assembly line started back up, and Phalanx units started rolling out again, now all Block 1B models. The Navy understood ESSM would work, just not right now, and our ships needed CIWS to defend themselves in the mean-time. New DDGs came out with either RAM or Phalanx fitted. The desire...get this: "when funds come available"... to have Phalanx foward and RAM aft. They just won't buy them both at once.

This is coming from BAE/Raytheon Systems.

Harpoons: The Flight IIA ships have adaptors and rails set up for Mk141 launchers to be installed between the aft VLS pad and the aft illuminators to fire criss-cross across the back of the ship while keeping clear of a phalanx or RAM mount if either installed. One must keep in mind also, Harpoon is a plug-and-play weapon, too. Anywhere you can fit them, you can stick them.

_________________
Proper Preparation Prevents Poor Performance


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 6:52 pm
Posts: 1038
Location: Y-town Ohio
Is there a good PE kit that will work with the Trumpeter 1/350 USS Momsen?

_________________
God grant me the courage not to give up what I think is right even though I think it is hopeless.
~ Chester W. Nimitz ~
My Builds ~ http://ussnorthcaroilna.shutterfly.com/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 466 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 24  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group