The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Thu May 23, 2024 3:55 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 528 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2014 9:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 7:53 pm
Posts: 446
Haijun watcher wrote:
Perth or anyone,

Does anyone know if the RAN has already decided on the new grey that Perth mentioned below?

Almost given on trying to find storm grey here in Canada...which is why I'm considering just using a haze grey for my 1/700 Fujimi Perry class kit. (original kit options: 1/700 USS De Wert/SPS Santa Maria of the Spanish Navy)

If worse comes to worse, I might either build it in a USN or Taiwanese/ROCN guise.

Perth_shipyard wrote:
Navy is going to change from storm grey to a colour similar to USN Haze grey but the actual colour is yet to be decided and no Australian ships have been repainted. Sydney FFG 03 will be decommissioned soon so you'll be safe painting your model in storm grey. Hope that helps.



Try converting the colours from Australian Standard to your own chart standards and get a hardware store to make up the paints.

That is what I did to paint my RAN ships. I just went to the local hardware store and I think it was a 1L tin I had to buy of each. At least it will never run out.

For the decks we use N63 Pewter - http://www.e-paint.co.uk/Colour_alterna ... ion=Pewter

The hull is storm grey - http://www.e-paint.co.uk/Lab_values.asp ... orm%20grey

http://www.e-paint.co.uk/Colour_alternatives.asp

The numbers on that website should at least help getting a hardware store to mix the paints up.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 8:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 7:36 am
Posts: 658
Location: Vigo, Spain
Hi all once again.

After this horrible, eternal winter that I would like to forget and I am not able to, I have had some time to devote to this construction, so I am now in the runway to say so.

The following step was to set in place all the handrails in both decks. The ones in the upper deck are made in steel tube, while the ones on the main deck are made in wire, so I had to make some --well, many-- tests stretching sprue to have threads in different calibers. I more or less got them, although at a short distance the difference is hard to appreciate.
I have also set in place the decks for the SAT aerials, with the supports and all the trimmings, and most of the elements in both decks are already glued in place as well.

It is now like this :
Attachment:
(425).jpg
(425).jpg [ 341.81 KiB | Viewed 2464 times ]

Attachment:
(426).jpg
(426).jpg [ 334.4 KiB | Viewed 2464 times ]

The flight deck is virtually finished as well, and the nets are to some extent translucent, what allows to see the details on deck through them. I didn´t expect so much, honestly. It is like this :
Attachment:
(427).jpg
(427).jpg [ 252.68 KiB | Viewed 2464 times ]

And finally, the whole ship looks like this at the moment :
Attachment:
(428).jpg
(428).jpg [ 293.69 KiB | Viewed 2464 times ]

Attachment:
(429).jpg
(429).jpg [ 295.73 KiB | Viewed 2464 times ]

Attachment:
(430).jpg
(430).jpg [ 288.16 KiB | Viewed 2464 times ]

And that´s all for today. I hope you like it, and warmest regards to you all,

Willie.

_________________
Amen dico tibi, hodie mecum eris in paradiso (Lk 23,43).


Last edited by Willie on Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:05 am
Posts: 49
The RAN will be changing colours to USN Haze Grey during the new mods on the ANZAC class ships. The first being either HMAS Warramunga or HMAS Ballarat. I am not sure if the FFG's will be getting the same colour change.

_________________
Hindsight always trumps forethought..............


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2014 6:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 1:33 am
Posts: 111
Location: Sydney, AU
Hi Guys

I have had the 1/350 USS Reuben James sitting for a while and finally ordered the Pontos "Advanced" upgrade set with the 25mm chain gun replacing the MK13 launcher.

My question is, as I believe all ships in class have the OTO 76mm as the main gun "would" or "could" that unit be replaced by the MK-45 5" 62CAL unit?

Thanks in advance.

Peter Hoskins
Sydney, AU


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2014 10:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 6:42 pm
Posts: 177
Peter H wrote:
Hi Guys

I have had the 1/350 USS Reuben James sitting for a while and finally ordered the Pontos "Advanced" upgrade set with the 25mm chain gun replacing the MK13 launcher.

My question is, as I believe all ships in class have the OTO 76mm as the main gun "would" or "could" that unit be replaced by the MK-45 5" 62CAL unit?

Thanks in advance.

Peter Hoskins
Sydney, AU


No way. Too much weight too high above the waterline (or CoG or whatever). I also don't believe the lightly constructed superstructure would long endure the recoil of the larger gun. Maybe in place of the Mk 13 launcher??

Cheers,

Keith


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 1:33 am
Posts: 111
Location: Sydney, AU
Hi Keith

Thanks for the reply, I was afraid it would be too much to ask of an older hull. So my kit will be standard with the Pontos extras and the 25mm chain gun forward.

Best regards

Peter H
Sydney, AU


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Docking Plans
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 5:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 6:42 pm
Posts: 177
FYI for anyone interested in portraying the underwater thru-hulls, sea chests, etc on their FFG model, the docking plans are availible in PDF at:

http://www.drydocktraining.com/drawings.html

Enjoy!

Keith


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 7:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:48 pm
Posts: 115
Location: Mount Vernon, WA USA
First item; awesome job Willie!

The 1/350 Academy Perry has what appear to be two reinforcement straps on each side of the hull about midships. I've noticed on all the pictures in navsource they appear to be a later (post 90' or so) addition and some ships only got one.

A I correct in thinking if I'm building a mid 80's Sides (FFG-14) that these should be removed?

Thank you!

_________________
-Rob <><


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 8:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 6:42 pm
Posts: 177
Rob Jansen wrote:
First item; awesome job Willie!

The 1/350 Academy Perry has what appear to be two reinforcement straps on each side of the hull about midships. I've noticed on all the pictures in navsource they appear to be a later (post 90' or so) addition and some ships only got one.

A I correct in thinking if I'm building a mid 80's Sides (FFG-14) that these should be removed?

Thank you!


You're probably correct. The hull doublers were added to remedy a design shortfall (missing expansion joint) that resulted in structural cracks amidships. I'm not sure exactly when they started showing up. I was in USS McInerney (FFG-8) in the mid '80s and we suffered the structural cracks in two separate heavy weather events. I don't recall the doubler plates being installed nor can I find photographic evidence of their existence during this period.

I'm currently building McInerney circa 1985 (w/ Pontos set), below are a few Academy errors (general and period/ship specific) I'm in the process of addressing:

Removed hull doublers
Removed TACTAS fairlead
Added missing bridge windows, port and strbd
relocated bridge fan room access door (port side next to FAS station)
Added CIC escape scuttle (02 level, forward of strbd SatNav antenna)
Corrected stanchion location under strbd SLQ-32 antenna
Added bridge pyro locker and weather instrument box (stbd side, forward of CAS equipment room door)
Corrected bridge wing configuration (life rafts and platforms for signal lights and CO's chair...check your photos)
Added port and stbd nav lights
Removed SRBOC sponsons
Corrected configuration of stbd high line station and ladder (may have varied by ship, check your photographs)
Opened superstructure vents and added PE wire mesh (many vents on main deck have spray shields installed, several should not...check your photographs)
Added missing watertight door (port side main deck, behind breakwater)
Removed hooded vent port side main deck
Added portholes for CO and XO staterooms; corrected launcher control window
Added missing boat boom (aft of breakwater, usually port side)

Probably more, but these things come to mind. All in all the kit is good, just need to check references for specific ship or period differences.

HTH,

Keith


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 7:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:48 pm
Posts: 115
Location: Mount Vernon, WA USA
Thank you very much Keith!

You've supplied a lot of valuable information; I will definitely comb through it all.

The Academy kit is a very good kit, my only real complaint was how they did the railings, way too thick and out of scale and their holes require lots of "plugging". aside from that it is a great build w/ really good fit.

I was on the USS Enterprise in the early to mid 80's I've had the Tamiya kit for thirty-years now...about 1/2 way through the island...someday...

I have no connection w/ FFG's or the Sides other than I visited it one 4th of July w/ my two sons in Anacortes Washington... almost twenty years ago...

Thanks again!

_________________
-Rob <><


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 3:44 pm
Posts: 108
I am planning to build a late configuration 1/350 Oliver Hazard Perry class frigate as the USS Elrod FFG-55. I will be using the Pontos advanced aftermarket set and it should build up into a nice looking ship.

I read over the form and hopefully this wasn't asked earlier. My question on researching these ships is that several appear not to have anchors, but rather empty wells on the right, err, starboard side. The anchor chain seems to also be removed on the deck. Is this correct, or are the anchors lifted inside the hull so it looks like they are missing? Thanks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 6:42 pm
Posts: 177
Yeah, David is correct. On Perrys the anchor is pretty much hidden when stowed. However you should still see the anchor chain (and other ground tackle eg. stoppers and pelican hooks) on deck. Perhaps you have photos of a ship during a yard period when the anchor and chain have been removed for inspection and maintenance?

HTH,

Keith


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 3:44 pm
Posts: 108
Thanks for the reply, I didn’t know those anchors could go all the way into the well. I guess I am too used to WWII ships!

As for the chain question, on further looking at my reference pic the chain may be hidden by the forecastle, so I’ll make sure to put one on.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:48 pm
Posts: 115
Location: Mount Vernon, WA USA
Hi another question: FFG-14 had a towed array in 1992, I'm sure of that...about what year did these start getting added to the class?

The reason I ask is I spent the weekend reworking a perfectly good hull to remove the reinforcing straps and adding new "bubble makers" and such to backdate to the mid 80's ...I'd hate to add this item if the period was wrong...

Thanks!

_________________
-Rob <><


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 11:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 6:42 pm
Posts: 177
Rob Jansen wrote:
Hi another question: FFG-14 had a towed array in 1992, I'm sure of that...about what year did these start getting added to the class?

The reason I ask is I spent the weekend reworking a perfectly good hull to remove the reinforcing straps and adding new "bubble makers" and such to backdate to the mid 80's ...I'd hate to add this item if the period was wrong...

Thanks!



The TACTAS was installed in McInerney during an overhaul in Boston '86-'87 and I believe she was one of the very first.

Cheers,


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 11:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 3:44 pm
Posts: 108
I came across this schematic while researching FFGs and thought it might be helpful for detailing purposes. It is for an early USS Ingraham FFG-61 with the Mk 13, but it shows the running lights and other little details. Forgive me if it already has been posted.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File: ... ematic.jpg


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 7:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:48 pm
Posts: 115
Location: Mount Vernon, WA USA
Thanks again Keith!

I'll leave it off then.

Thank you Philip good stuff in that drawing.

And thanks to all for some really great posts. Willie... wow... yeah no pressure there...LOL, and Sean how is yours going? :thumbs_up_1:

-Rob

_________________
-Rob <><


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 7:36 am
Posts: 658
Location: Vigo, Spain
Hi all once more:

Well, the last thing to do is the final fixing, and a couple of minor details.
The halyards are made of stretched sprue, glued at the top and loose at the bottom, what makes the process way easier, and makes no difference reg. realism.

The main mast has twelve wire aerials, six on each side, in groups of three, fixed at the top with short Evergreen strips, and at the bottom using a kind of Evergreen sandwiches --the same way as in the original FFG´s-- that are necessarily much bigger than the original elements, but it is something we have to accept.This :
Attachment:
(431).jpg
(431).jpg [ 310.34 KiB | Viewed 2464 times ]

Once in position, the effect is very realistic and convincing:
Attachment:
(432).jpg
(432).jpg [ 280.47 KiB | Viewed 2464 times ]

Maybe the halyards are a bit thicker than necessary, but I was not able to make them thinner so that the liquid poly does not melt them. In the pics they look also much thicker than they actually are because they are not painted in order to make somehow translucent.
Attachment:
(433).jpg
(433).jpg [ 327.87 KiB | Viewed 2464 times ]

Attachment:
(434).jpg
(434).jpg [ 346.29 KiB | Viewed 2464 times ]

The halyards in the upper mizzen do interfere with the elements present there and do not fall straight, which is exactly what happens with the 1/1 Santa María. This not only adds another element of realism I didn´t count with, but is also a further evidence that the measures of the mast are correct. Wonderful.
Attachment:
(435).jpg
(435).jpg [ 354.23 KiB | Viewed 2464 times ]

Attachment:
(436).jpg
(436).jpg [ 296.98 KiB | Viewed 2464 times ]

The flight control station in the flight deck is made with a piece of evergreen, and the windows profiles again with stretched sprue :
Attachment:
(437).jpg
(437).jpg [ 226.76 KiB | Viewed 2464 times ]

As you can see, the macro has no mercy on mistakes, but at half a foot distance these mistakes disappear, and the effect is excellent.
Attachment:
(438).jpg
(438).jpg [ 286.39 KiB | Viewed 2464 times ]

And at last a touch of color, the crest of the 41st Squadron and the specific crest of Santa María. I would tell you a lie if I said that I got them at the first attempt, so I will not say so... :biggrin: But at last I got them. Not as well as I would have wished, but I can live with it.
Attachment:
(439).jpg
(439).jpg [ 283.95 KiB | Viewed 2464 times ]

Attachment:
(440).JPG
(440).JPG [ 177.42 KiB | Viewed 2464 times ]

And that´s all. I will try to upload some pics of the finished ship tomorrow, if possible.

Brgds,

Willie.

_________________
Amen dico tibi, hodie mecum eris in paradiso (Lk 23,43).


Last edited by Willie on Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2014 12:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 336
New masking product, ready for airbrush spraying. Oliver Hazard Perry FFG, long hull version to come.

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2014 3:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 9
Those masks look great. Will they be available in 1/96 and 1/72 scale?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 528 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group