The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 7:30 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1211 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 57, 58, 59, 60, 61  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2021 4:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 3825
"USS Forrest DD-461",

USS FORREST (DD-461), built at the Boston Navy Yard, was completed in April 1942 to the standard configuration for "Repeat-Gleaves Class" units. Because the planned two twin 40-mm mounts were not yet available, one quad 1.1-in mount was installed on the starboard side, and five 20-mm guns. Initially she was painted in Ms 12R(mod). By October 1942 she had repainted to Ms 22 with the same armament. In February-March 1943, completing about 25 March 1943, FORREST was upgraded to the standard two twin 40-mm mounts and seven single 20-mm guns at Norfolk Navy Yard. (DANFS skips over this) She remained in this configuration until converting to the DMS configuration (as DMS-24) in November 1944. The DMS configuration that FORREST was modified to, retained three 5-in/38cal guns, two twin 40-mm mounts, and seven 20-mm guns. The 54 mount and torpedo tubes were removed to accommodate the minesweeping gear. Any additional guns added isn't known by me. Likely no additional 20-mm guns would have been added, due to a lack of space for such a weapon. Adding 50-cal MGs around the ship was actually a pretty common installation late in WWII to counter floating mines and "Kamikaze Boats". In the last image I posted, you can see two 50-cal MG's atop the pilothouse.

Her operational history is outlined in DANFS, as an escort for USS RANGER and various convoys, plus D-Day support. More specifics can be found on Fold3 in her War Diaries. An interesting mission, was her escort mission and assignment to serve with the RN Home Fleet in the summer-fall of 1943. I have her noted as being assigned to DesRon 10, DesDiv 20. She could have been reassigned at some point, but I don't have that info. Her unit assignment was as a DMS was I believe with MineDiv 58.

Image

Image

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2021 6:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 12, 2021 9:48 am
Posts: 6
Wow!!!! Thank you very much for posting such excellent photo's and a great rundown of DD-461's history. Yes, you are correct in that it's last assignment in 1945 was with MinDiv 58 (MinRon 20). (I have an interesting crewmember anecdote about one of the 50cals a few days before the kamikaze strike of May 27th 1945). I have seen 229313/335595/15821 photo's before but never with such resolution. Thanks again for posting! The March 25th 1943 is completely new to me. Do you have a primary source reference for the yard overhaul order(s) for the new weapon configuration that I could look up? I would like to share some of the ship's photos I have located but they average 5MB: can you explain how I can downsize them for attachment? Thank you.

_________________
Conducting Tier 12 ops at Fort Living Room.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2021 7:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 3825
I have one revision to make to what I wrote before. After I looked at the 25 March 1943 photos again and thought about them, I suspect that USS FORREST was upgraded with the twin 40-mm mounts earlier, likely late 1942 or early 1943 after Operation Torch. I say that because the circles on the photos indicate "modifications" made during that yard period. The only circles are to relocation of the searchlight and relocation of the Mk 51 directors further inboard and raised. BINGO!! I just checked the Weekly Overhaul Reports that I have copied at NARA, and by pure chance (I have VERY few pages of these reports for Norfolk Navy Yard!!!) I captured FORREST's work at NorNY when the twin 40-mm armament upgrade was accomplished. See attachment. She arrived at the yard on 30 Jan 1943, and completed in early February 1943 or or after 9 February 1943. I don't have the actual finish date, since it would have shown up in a subsequent report I don't have. But, by checking DANFS for DesRon mates also at NorNY for similar work, I found that USS CORRY (DD-461) departed Norfolk for duty on 13 February 1943. That means that these three destroyers likely finished on time to the projected 9 February 1943 date authorized to finish the work, or shortly after that day. It normally took a day or two to do a checkout of work done cruise and to ready the ship for sea duty.

Image

The only way you can find the detailed yard period work you are looking for on USS FORREST, is to go to NARA II, College Park, MD and pull her BuShips Textual Records and look for Departure Reports (or hire someone to do it for you). But like everything else, NARA is closed. There are rumblings that they MAY open yet this summer, but not likely before early August.

As to posting images, you can post images of a smaller size in data and pixels directly via the "Upload Attachments" function below. But, you would need to really downsize 5MB images to do that. The method I use is utilizing an image hosting service like Photobucket. I pay for this service with Photobucket, but there are other services out there, some that are free as long as you don't post too much. I have not looked at what services are available for quite sometime, so I can't recommend any for your needs.

Also, you want, you can PM me in this forum and we can arrange for me to post them here for you.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2021 8:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 12, 2021 9:48 am
Posts: 6
Another fantastic data set - thank you! Mystery solved in such short order. Amazing.

Reference's for DesRon 10 and MinRon 20:

https://destroyerhistory.org/benson-gle ... /desron10/
https://destroyerhistory.org/benson-gle ... /minron20/

_________________
Conducting Tier 12 ops at Fort Living Room.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2021 9:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 8159
Location: New Jersey
Wow. That's an unusual camouflage scheme for 1945, isn't it?

_________________
Martin

"Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." John Wayne

Ship Model Gallery


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2021 11:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 3825
Martin,

I had forgotten about this photo that I scanned at NARA back in 2015. Initially, I was surprised at this date that a DMS was still painted in dazzle. But, going to Lee Johnson's website and to the GLEAVES class DMS conversions ... http://www.usndazzle.com/design.php?cat ... for_num=19 ... it turns out that all of the first group of twelve converted units were assigned this pattern (Ms 32a/29D) or a couple of other patterns (Ms 32/3D(rev), Ms 32/25D and Ms32a/22D). The period prior to Okinawa Invasion, saw many Pacific units being repainted during the return of Ms 21 and Ms 22. But, I do have a few photos of some units still painted in dazzle into April 1945.

Reading Lee's notes for Ms 32a/29D, he couldn't find a drawing for this pattern and apparently the darker paint varied as well.

I miss Lee. For a longtime whenever I was at NARA, Lee would be there.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2021 11:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 12, 2021 9:48 am
Posts: 6
Thanks to all who have assisted my endeavor. With the information available in the thread, I believe there is enough data to proceed with my project. My intent is to construct three models of the USS Forrest depicting three general phases of its service history: early (1942 Operation TORCH timeframe); mid-war (1944 Operation NEPTUNE timeframe); late-war (1945 Operation ICEBERG timeframe). All comments, advice, and insight is very welcome. Thank you.

_________________
Conducting Tier 12 ops at Fort Living Room.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2021 6:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 12:44 pm
Posts: 99
Location: Huntington Beach, CA 92646-5446
Matt, what progress has Kraken Hobbies & Red Devil Designs made on Gleaves class square bridge (see above p58, 27MAR2021 and p55, 05JUL2020) conversion sets and also on Rick's suggestions for additional DESDIV22 (see above p55, 07JUL2020) conversion sets? Your earlier previews seemed so promising. R/David


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2021 10:32 pm 
Offline
Kraken Hobbies
Kraken Hobbies

Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 1:43 am
Posts: 125
Location: Pacific Northwest
David Sandifer wrote:
what progress has Kraken Hobbies & Red Devil Designs made on Gleaves class square bridge


David,

Apologies for the confusion. Justin over at Red Devil is now up and running with his own printer and releasing sets. He currently has an eBay shop but I know he is working on a website similar to Kraken's. You can find the parts he is doing now here-

With 20mm Bandstand
Without 20mm Bandstand

HTH,
Matt

_________________
Kraken Hobbies Online Store
Follow us on Facebook


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Aug 04, 2021 6:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 12:44 pm
Posts: 99
Location: Huntington Beach, CA 92646-5446
Justin at Red Devil Designs,
The 1/350 Gleaves Class Square Bridge Conversion Set with 20mm Tub/Ammo Box was delivered today. It's OUTSTANDING!
Please consider designing a WWII USN DMS conversion set, similar to the Black Cat Models AC350087 Royal Navy WWII Minesweeping Gear.
I'll combine a USN minesweeping suite, your Gleaves Class Square Bridge, and a Dragon 1945 Benson DD to build a DEC44 Harding DMS28 in ms 32/3D.
R/David


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2021 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 11:13 am
Posts: 263
Location: Michigan
David Sandifer wrote:
Justin at Red Devil Designs,
The 1/350 Gleaves Class Square Bridge Conversion Set with 20mm Tub/Ammo Box was delivered today. It's OUTSTANDING!
Please consider designing a WWII USN DMS conversion set, similar to the Black Cat Models AC350087 Royal Navy WWII Minesweeping Gear.
I'll combine a USN minesweeping suite, your Gleaves Class Square Bridge, and a Dragon 1945 Benson DD to build a DEC44 Harding DMS28 in ms 32/3D.
R/David


David, thank you! I'm glad they arrived safe! I look forward to your build!! keep us posted, please!! I will look into that conversion! I've got a bit on the plan board at the moment, but I'll give it a gander when I get a chance!

_________________
The Workbench:
1/350 USS Vincennes
1/350 USS Indianapolis
Future Builds:
1/350 USS Quincy
1/350 Tam USS Missouri





Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 12, 2021 9:48 am
Posts: 6
Caption: "USS Macomb sets sail from Boston for Panama" Date: April 1st 1947


Attachments:
USS Macomb DMS-23 Departs Boston for Panama April 1st 1947 resized.jpg
USS Macomb DMS-23 Departs Boston for Panama April 1st 1947 resized.jpg [ 292.62 KiB | Viewed 1705 times ]

_________________
Conducting Tier 12 ops at Fort Living Room.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2022 10:23 am 
Greetings to all Benson/Gleaves-class fans.
Got a couple of questions, would be very grateful if anyone could help me out.

No. 1. This is a picture of USS Livermore DD-429. What I am unsure of is which camouflage measure does she wear in the picture, what configuration of AA armament is present on the ship and when could this picture have been taken? Navsource doesn't indicate the date, sadly. Could this by any chance be the exact same configuration as Dragon's model represents, camouflage aside?
http://www.navsource.org/archives/05/pix1/0542907.jpg

No. 2. In this picture of the same ship there seems to be 2 extra objects around the director base (5 as opposed to 3). Am I seeing things or is there actually something there and what could it be?
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... 429_01.jpg

Any additional pictures are also welcome if anyone is willing to share.

Thank you all in advance.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2022 5:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:29 pm
Posts: 1950
Your first photo shows her in 1945 after an anti-kamikaze upgrade. She has quad 40MM just forward of mount 53 (#3 5" gun) and twin 40MM between the stacks. All torpedo tubes have been removed. She also has a MK-25 radar dish on the MK-37 director and the short ECM mast aft. Camo is MS-21, but from the photo, it can't be determined whether she is in Navy Blue, or the Navy Gray adopted when the blue pigment ran out.

As for the second photo, I am unsure what objects you are referring to.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2022 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:41 pm
Posts: 2927
Location: Mocksville, NC
Guest Wrote:
Quote:
No. 2. In this picture of the same ship there seems to be 2 extra objects around the director base (5 as opposed to 3). Am I seeing things or is there actually something there and what could it be?

The objects located on the outer surface of the Main Battery Director barbette are called "peep holes" although that's a rather generic term. Those are actually either round or oval openings or viewports in the sides of the barbette, more than likely equally spaced on either side of the barbette. They are very similar to the ones that originally were located on the conning tower of the IOWA class in that that they have angled openings to deflect possible incoming rounds or shrapnel from close bursts. These ports have covers which can be lowered to close off these ports when needed. As the picture is still a bit distant, I can't tell if those ports have retractable (geared) covers or hinged covers. The inside opening is thus smaller than the outside due to the angle of the opening.

Hope this helps,

_________________
HMS III
Mocksville, NC
BB62 vet 68-69

Builder's yard:
USS STODDARD (DD-566) 66-68 1:144, Various Lg Scale FC Directors
Finished:
USS NEW JERSEY (BB-62) 67-69 1:200
USN Sloop/Ship PEACOCK (1813) 1:48
ROYAL CAROLINE (1748) 1:47
AVS (1768) 1:48


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2022 6:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:15 am
Posts: 5003
The director barbettes on the destroyers only had anti splinter plating? Not sure but probably 20 lb plate max? This would allow for a fairly simple closure as opposed to those on the heavily armored battleship conning towers. Top weight was quite critical in these ships. It would be interesting to see drawings or photos of just how these worked. Alaska CB1 had similar viewing slits on her aft MK 37 Barbette but she probably could have allowed a heavier plating.

Best regards: Tom


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2022 3:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2021 3:36 am
Posts: 8
Hi Rick,

I’ve read this topic in detail, which greatly enriched my knowledge.What a wonderful forum! :thumbs_up_1:

Recently I'm building some 1/700 desron12 tincans, and I noticed your photo about Buchanan (the last picture, shows buke's foremast on 24 August 1943). It seems there’s a mascot on the side of the Mk37 director. I'm certain that it's neither the ship's scoreboard (shown on the bridge wings) nor the "Scrapperoos" symbol (not appeared until the Rabaul strike). I really wonder if it's an early version of desron12's symbol or just the mascot of buchanan herself.

Do you have a clearer version of the photo, or any ideas about buchanan's mascot? I tried to search on navsource and NHHC, but they didn't show this photo.

Thanks,
Pan

Rick E Davis wrote:
Matthew,


Here is a view of USS BUCHANAN ... 24 August 1943 ... even at this date, she still doesn't have a SG radar installed but does have a stovepipe BL antenna (installed on port yardarm)

Image


Last edited by cheyenovich on Sat Apr 08, 2023 12:14 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 3825
Pan,

Actually what you think is a "badge/mascot", is actually canvas around the rangefinder of the Mk 37 director.

I have three different views of USS BUCHANAN (DD-484) taken at the same time, but none are close-up or high enough res to clearly see the Mk 37 director due to distance from the camera of the photos. However, this image taken from a more forward quarter aspect shows that the "object" is not on the side of the director, but is hanging on the rangefinder.

Attachment:
zDD484x25crop-31Jul43.jpeg
zDD484x25crop-31Jul43.jpeg [ 182.45 KiB | Viewed 1599 times ]


Also, this in yard view taken at MINY after her summer 1944 overhaul was repaired shows the canvas cover of the rangefinder opening in the Mk 37 director is outsized and looks very baggy.

Attachment:
zDD484x34crop2-23Jun44.jpeg
zDD484x34crop2-23Jun44.jpeg [ 188.71 KiB | Viewed 1599 times ]


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2022 3:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2021 3:36 am
Posts: 8
Thx Rick,

I got what you mean, however, maybe I didn't make it clear. I refer to the irregular shape before the canvas (I've pointed it out in the picture below). I compared the photos of Buchanan's and Lansdowne's bridge in 1943, it seems that their scoreboards were both on the bridge wings... though in 1944 the scoreboard is at where the arrow pointed, the shape was different. So I don't think the irregular shape is a scoreboard.
Attachment:
20221219151347.jpg
20221219151347.jpg [ 111.42 KiB | Viewed 1586 times ]


I know that some sailors created interesting paintings on their ships, while many of them didn't leave official records. As an example, there's one on Wilkes' No.1 mount.
Attachment:
wilkes April 44_20221219152010.png
wilkes April 44_20221219152010.png [ 845.79 KiB | Viewed 1586 times ]


Anyway, Buchanan's case is simply my personal guess... Oh well, would you happen to have any info of the photo below? NHHC said its' taken on July 31, 1943, while Buchanan broke her bow on July 13, during the battle of Kolombangara... I have some doubts about it. If NHHC is right, it's over two weeks when Buchanan got the chance to enter a dry dock for reparations (That would show how hard the Solomon Islands Campaign is) ... And at that time, the irregular shape had appeared on the director.
Attachment:
0548402.jpg
0548402.jpg [ 122.79 KiB | Viewed 1586 times ]

Rick E Davis wrote:
Pan,

Actually what you think is a "badge/mascot", is actually canvas around the rangefinder of the Mk 37 director.

I have three different views of USS BUCHANAN (DD-484) taken at the same time, but none are close-up or high enough res to clearly see the Mk 37 director due to distance from the camera of the photos. However, this image taken from a more forward quarter aspect shows that the "object" is not on the side of the director, but is hanging on the rangefinder.

Attachment:
The attachment 20221219151347.jpg is no longer available


Also, this in yard view taken at MINY after her summer 1944 overhaul was repaired shows the canvas cover of the rangefinder opening in the Mk 37 director is outsized and looks very baggy.

Attachment:
The attachment 20221219151347.jpg is no longer available


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2022 2:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 3825
Pan,

I still think the "mystery" markings are more likely to be a scoreboard based on the shape and that the scoreboard was "expanded" at MINY during 1944 in that same location. But, who knows. There was no "standard" placement of scoreboards. In 1/700 scale, this "marking(s)" would be no more than a couple of "dots" anyway.

Dates on USN photos, especially taken in the forward areas and filed in the 80-G collection, should always be considered suspect without additional knowledge/research. The three images I have scanned at NARA that appear to have been taken at the same time and place, however they have two different dates ... 31 July 1943 and 24 August 1943. The dates on 80-G photos are more likely the date received by the USN Photo Collection Office or as turned in by the ship to higher command, unless the true date was written on the back of the original print. Checking Deck Logs and/or War Diaries would provide a better idea of when these photos were taken. I didn't note what ship the cameraman was onboard when he took the photo, which I normally provide unless the ship is unknown, which would narrow down the true date even tighter by cross checking when that ship (and USS PRINGLE in the background) was also at Tulagi. Her 13 July 1943 collision damage was repaired locally.

I neglected to comment about small cartoons applied on particularly 5-in mounts, this practice was fairly common, especially late in the war.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1211 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 57, 58, 59, 60, 61  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group