The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:36 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 2:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 4:08 pm
Posts: 258
Location: United States
Tracy White wrote:
Circling back on the class as I'm trying to create "the" authoritative list of what dangerous black tubes I want to build. :big_grin:

At this time to it looks like:
Block I/II SSN-774 through SSN-783 - Hobbyboss kit "as is" with the addition of AN/WSQ-9 on the stern planes for SSN-776 and later.
Block III/IV SSN-784 through SSN-801 - Hobbyboss kit with some rescribing on the bow to update VLS and possibly vents, flat topped towed sonar blister, and AN/WSQ-9.
Block V SSN-802 through about SSN-811 - At least a plug to lengthen the hull and add four more VLS as part of the Virginia Payload Module.

Comments / ways I am leading myself astray?


The only thing I would add is that probably all of the Block V will have the Large Vertical Array. It's a large rectangular blister between the forward and mid WAA arrays that wraps around most of the hull on either side. The port array is a bit further back than the starboard array. The South Dakota has it fitted now, and I think it's planned to retrofit onto some of the newer Virginias (and the Columbia class).

Jacob

_________________
Under Construction:
1/350 Typhoon
1/350 Skate
1/350 USS Nautilus
1/350 Tang
1/350 November
1/350 Hotel II
1/350 Alfa
1/350 George Washington
1/72 Type VIIC


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 7:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 10:20 am
Posts: 55
Vepr157 wrote:
Tracy White wrote:
Circling back on the class as I'm trying to create "the" authoritative list of what dangerous black tubes I want to build. :big_grin:

At this time to it looks like:
Block I/II SSN-774 through SSN-783 - Hobbyboss kit "as is" with the addition of AN/WSQ-9 on the stern planes for SSN-776 and later.
Block III/IV SSN-784 through SSN-801 - Hobbyboss kit with some rescribing on the bow to update VLS and possibly vents, flat topped towed sonar blister, and AN/WSQ-9.
Block V SSN-802 through about SSN-811 - At least a plug to lengthen the hull and add four more VLS as part of the Virginia Payload Module.

Comments / ways I am leading myself astray?


The only thing I would add is that probably all of the Block V will have the Large Vertical Array. It's a large rectangular blister between the forward and mid WAA arrays that wraps around most of the hull on either side. The port array is a bit further back than the starboard array. The South Dakota has it fitted now, and I think it's planned to retrofit onto some of the newer Virginias (and the Columbia class).

Jacob


I'd just add that Blk I can be modeled "as built" without WSQ-9, but if you choose to add it, the forward WSQ-9s are positioned differently than boats with it from initial build.

The fatline array fairing on Blk III and on is flat on top except on the two removable parts (very front and about midway) where they are rounded like earlier blocks.

Concur Blk V on will have LVA and backfit will likely occur for all but Blk I. I find it interesting that they are not symmetrical port at starboard.

You'll have to add MIP to the kit as well.

Cheers,

Dave


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2022 2:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 2:38 am
Posts: 9
Location: Colorado, USA
Is anyone aware of an updated bow section (resin or 3D printed) for the Block III boats with the VLM that replaces the VLS? Or is there a diagram available that shows where a modeler would have to rescribe the VLM's into the bow to do a Block III. I am wanting to model the USS Colorado (SSN-788).


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2022 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:39 pm
Posts: 769
Location: Westminster, Colorado
Greetings all,
To start I have no affiliation with RCSUBS other than I'm a fanboy of their products and I've worked with him on this particular kit. I've been working with Oto Gerza of RCSUBS.CZ on the Block III variant of the Virginia Class submarine. He has already released the 1/144 Block I version of the boat and now has available the 1/144 Block III version. It's a big model at just under 32 inches. You can also buy it in 1/72 scale. I just ordered mine today! He provides a variety of way to purchase the kit.
Option 1: You receive STL files via download. Plans along with photo etch detail set are mailed to you. You print your own.
Option 2: You receive Printed hull sections off a high resolution Filament PLA printer, STL files, photo etch set, and plans all mailed directly to you.

I purchased one of their German UB-1 models which came in three sections and they match up perfectly. My friend printed them for me on his SLA printer. I expect the same results of this much larger model.

If you check out their web site https://www.rcsubs.cz/index.php you can sell all their products, and Oto also updates his Facebook page regularly.

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 10:20 am
Posts: 55
There are so many things I love when looking at this kit, but the bow is completely throwing me. The overall shape of the bow looks off and the arrangement of the VLS tubes and VPTs and surrounding areas just seems to miss,. I need to take a longer look, but there are so many things that they seemed to absolutely nail.

Dave


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2022 11:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:39 pm
Posts: 769
Location: Westminster, Colorado
ssn705 wrote:
There are so many things I love when looking at this kit, but the bow is completely throwing me. The overall shape of the bow looks off and the arrangement of the VLS tubes and VPTs and surrounding areas just seems to miss,. I need to take a longer look, but there are so many things that they seemed to absolutely nail.

Dave


Oto and I poured over every detail. I have the final drawings. The shape of the bow is correct. The VLS/VPT door covers have the proper angle to them. They are not 90 degrees to the center line. The depression around the VLS/VPT area was carefully studied and reproduced. The towed array cover for the Block III was also carefully studied as well as the stern planes and sensors. We also made some minor changes to the sail to reflect Block III. What you don't see here is that Oto also has created all the masts including the photonics. Also included with a high quality photo etch set are proper hull markings (not numbers and names). You can buy the kit complete and printed, or you can get the print file and Oto will send you the photo etch, decals, and plans separately. You won't be disappointed.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2022 1:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10448
Location: EG48
Direct Link

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 13, 2022 7:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 10:20 am
Posts: 55
davidwaples wrote:
ssn705 wrote:
There are so many things I love when looking at this kit, but the bow is completely throwing me. The overall shape of the bow looks off and the arrangement of the VLS tubes and VPTs and surrounding areas just seems to miss,. I need to take a longer look, but there are so many things that they seemed to absolutely nail.

Dave


Oto and I poured over every detail. I have the final drawings. The shape of the bow is correct. The VLS/VPT door covers have the proper angle to them. They are not 90 degrees to the center line. The depression around the VLS/VPT area was carefully studied and reproduced. The towed array cover for the Block III was also carefully studied as well as the stern planes and sensors. We also made some minor changes to the sail to reflect Block III. What you don't see here is that Oto also has created all the masts including the photonics. Also included with a high quality photo etch set are proper hull markings (not numbers and names). You can buy the kit complete and printed, or you can get the print file and Oto will send you the photo etch, decals, and plans separately. You won't be disappointed.


Like I said in my first comment, I love the fact that you got so many things right and have so much detail. Some things just stood out to me. The big thing that appears off is the shape of the bow. It may perfectly match your drawing, but I would then question the drawing. On the kit, by the pictures that are posted, the VLS/VPT area appears to be perfectly horizontal (meaning the hull is constant diameter through this area). On the real thing, the diameter of the hull starts to decrease just forward of the "boot" (the fairing at the bottom forward edge of the sail) making the entire VLS/VPT area slope down (at a slightly increasing rate) as you move towards the bow.

What I am seeing could just be a function of the pictures that are posted, but I don't think so.

Other minor comments I would make... the Blk I appears to show the forward OTAAs for WSQ-9 but not the aft ones on the sternplanes like the Blk III. It is all four or none. Blk Is had it back fit so early = none, now = 4. And the "backfit" forward ones are in a different spot from "as built" ones.

Blk I port stem plane doesn't show a towed array tube (you have it on the Blk III)

Dihedrals fair in to the hull like the curve of the sail "boot" but the kit has a 45 degree straight angle

You only give the upper access cover for the starboard external launcher, while port is missing ( your bottom detail here is correct though)

Overall, I think it is a beautiful kit that needs some love for the bow. I am highly impressed by the level of detail across the boat from stem to stern. I'll likely order one myself.

Dave


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:39 pm
Posts: 769
Location: Westminster, Colorado
This may help. Here's a segment from Oto's drawings showing the taper from the forward end of the sail. I think you'll be happy with the kit. I purchased his UB-1 submarine in 1/72 scale and it is a masterpiece. Much better than anything else on the market. I would highly recommend printing on a 4k SLA printer. If you don't have one find somebody who does. By doing that you get rid of the screw down towed array covers that you see in the drawings and any striations.

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 2:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 4:08 pm
Posts: 258
Location: United States
It's certainly an excellent effort for a model that did not use official drawings as reference, but like ssn705 said, it's not entirely accurate. It looks like the shape and some details (e.g., MBT flood holes) are similar to drawings I've seen on the Russian airbase forums and the Hobby Boss 1/350 kit, but unfortunately those aren't too accurate. The main issues I see are the bow and stern shapes and the WAA fairings (although in fairness, I have not seen a non-official Virginia model with correct WAA fairings).

Also note that on the Block III and later submarines, the forward MBT flood holes are totally different; they have an unusual splitter shape that you can see in roll-out videos published by NNS or in this photo:

http://navsource.org/archives/08/790/0879817.jpg

This drawing of the South Dakota is accurate (note the WAA fairing spacing and shape) and even has the MSW seachests indicated:

https://i.imgur.com/7HJC9n5.png

These drawings of the various designs for the VPM are also good reference material:

https://i.imgur.com/nXLmoj7.png

Jacob

_________________
Under Construction:
1/350 Typhoon
1/350 Skate
1/350 USS Nautilus
1/350 Tang
1/350 November
1/350 Hotel II
1/350 Alfa
1/350 George Washington
1/72 Type VIIC


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 6:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:39 pm
Posts: 769
Location: Westminster, Colorado
Fair comment about the intakes for the main ballast tanks. I've sent that forward to Oto Gerza, the designer. He's a stickler for detail and will want to address it. The challenge for anyone is getting drawings of these intakes and correct placement. I think about the best that can be done is to interpolate images.

It is correct that the Block I print does not have the extensions on the stern planes. I'll share that with Oto as well.

As far as the fairings go on the planes and dihedrals, the 45 degree angel discussed is a support for printing which is removed. They have the correct finished shape. I don't have permission to share the drawings I have so I'll not do that yet. But if you look at it you can see that they are meant to be removed.

Thanks for the comments. More to come.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 8:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2015 11:02 am
Posts: 160
davidwaples wrote:
Fair comment about the intakes for the main ballast tanks. I've sent that forward to Oto Gerza, the designer. He's a stickler for detail and will want to address it. The challenge for anyone is getting drawings of these intakes and correct placement. I think about the best that can be done is to interpolate images.

It is correct that the Block I print does not have the extensions on the stern planes. I'll share that with Oto as well.

As far as the fairings go on the planes and dihedrals, the 45 degree angel discussed is a support for printing which is removed. They have the correct finished shape. I don't have permission to share the drawings I have so I'll not do that yet. But if you look at it you can see that they are meant to be removed.

Thanks for the comments. More to come.


Any possibility in offering any of these up in 1/350?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 11:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:39 pm
Posts: 769
Location: Westminster, Colorado
Woodstock74 wrote:
davidwaples wrote:
Fair comment about the intakes for the main ballast tanks. I've sent that forward to Oto Gerza, the designer. He's a stickler for detail and will want to address it. The challenge for anyone is getting drawings of these intakes and correct placement. I think about the best that can be done is to interpolate images.

It is correct that the Block I print does not have the extensions on the stern planes. I'll share that with Oto as well.

As far as the fairings go on the planes and dihedrals, the 45 degree angel discussed is a support for printing which is removed. They have the correct finished shape. I don't have permission to share the drawings I have so I'll not do that yet. But if you look at it you can see that they are meant to be removed.

Thanks for the comments. More to come.


Any possibility in offering any of these up in 1/350?


Not likely. I was lucky to get them sized to 1/144. Typically they do larger scales for the RC submarine community.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2022 11:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10448
Location: EG48
I'm interested but will wait until the local sub mafia is satisfied that things are ship shape to order one in 1/144.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2022 7:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2015 11:02 am
Posts: 160
Quote:
Not likely. I was lucky to get them sized to 1/144. Typically they do larger scales for the RC submarine community.


Yeah for sure, 1/350 is purely for the static modeling community. A shame the Hobby Boss 1/350 kit is trash.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2022 8:11 am 
Offline
Model Monkey
Model Monkey

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 3952
Location: USA
I'd like to offer a Virginia class attack boat in 1/350 scale, a full 3D-printed kit, a big project for 2023. There are some significant issues that would have to be resolved in order to do so.

1. To make a reasonably accurate design pleasing to the local sub mafia, I'd need a lot of help with quality references and advice during development. Unclassified Virginia class authoritative references are rarer than hens teeth, understandably so.

2. I would want to steer well clear of any national security issues or concerns. Design characteristics of the real boat are obviously sensitive so we would have to be very mindful of that. We don't want anyone to get in any trouble over a model. Navy Public Affairs may be helpful.

3. 3D-printed models aren't cheap and model geometry matters in keeping the cost of a model within reach of most potential customers. I think the best way to print the model would be to print the hull in 4 tubular sections, like the real Block II / III / IV hulls. Taller parts take longer to print. Long print times adversely affect cost (time = money). By printing tubes, I can keep the print time reasonable and the cost within customer reach.

4. Mike makes some really good 3D-printed screws. He'd be the guy for the pump-jet propulsor. Again, the geometry of the real propulsor is sensitive and we'd have to be mindful of that. So this is a feature where a reasonable approximation would have to do. An okay propulsor model may be one of those, "Yeah I know the model is not quite right, but there is a very good reason it is not quite right" situations.

Thoughts?

In the mean time, the Hobby Boss kit is what we have.

_________________
Have fun, Monkey around.™

-Steve L.

Complete catalog: - https://www.model-monkey.com/
Follow Model Monkey® on Facebook: - https://www.facebook.com/modelmonkeybookandhobby


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2022 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:39 pm
Posts: 769
Location: Westminster, Colorado
Hi Steve,
I think a proper 1/350 Virginia Class would be great. You may want to see if you can work something out with Oto Gerza with RCSUBS as he's done the lions share of the work already. I'm not sure if he's interested but I don't think he has any ambitions to work with 1/350 models on his own. If you would like an introduction let me know.

I don't think there's much controversy about what Oto has done. There's some discussion about the bow section. However looking at drawings on the web there are a lot of inconsistencies. Photos can suffer from distortion. I've sent him the information about the updated bow flood holes. The aft seem to be unchanged. You might try reaching out to General Dynamics Electric Boat.

My favorite source of photos is seaforces.org. They have excellent high resolution photos that show a lot of detail, short of the propulsor.

Hard to know what block IV and V will really look like. The idea has been made public, but they have not been built yet so anything is just speculation. I would concentrate on a Block II and/or Block III.

Dave


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2022 1:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:39 pm
Posts: 769
Location: Westminster, Colorado
I've sent the photos that show (what there is to show) of the bow main ballast tank flood holes, or whatever they are called today. I think I have it pretty close and the rest needs to be interpreted from photos. Keep in mind that I don't have a good CAD package and this is about as good as I can do with the limited resources I have. Please be kind! I laid these over Oto's current plans. I have no personal interest in this project except that I'm like most of you and would like a good product which I believe Oto delivers.

What is unclear are the coverings of the four most aft vents and if there are any more vents past what is shown in the photos already provided. Also the finished covering of those vents. The aft vents according to photos I've seen of Block III seem to be unchanged. If anyone can show anything different please let me know.

Anyway, comments are welcome.

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2022 1:36 pm 
Offline
Model Monkey
Model Monkey

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 3952
Location: USA
Thanks, all.

Hope to be able to offer a 1/350 Virginia next year.

_________________
Have fun, Monkey around.™

-Steve L.

Complete catalog: - https://www.model-monkey.com/
Follow Model Monkey® on Facebook: - https://www.facebook.com/modelmonkeybookandhobby


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2022 4:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 4:08 pm
Posts: 258
Location: United States
davidwaples,

Nice work! In regard to the flood holes, there is a second group for MBT3 located at about the same distance back as the sail fillet. All of the forward flood holes have the splitter design (not sure why some of the aft ones on the MBT1/2 group don't have them in the photo above). This video has a view good views of them (also note the WLY-1 dome next to the MBT3 group):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMRFG5av-rc

You're right, the aft group of flood holes looks the same as the previous Blocks with the perforated grating cover, as evidenced by this photo (note the anchor; the SPM/SPU opening is on the other side):

http://navsource.org/archives/08/780/0878505w.jpg

Block IV is easy to model, because as far as I'm aware they are externally identical to the Block III. You could probably make a pretty good Block V from two sources of information, this EB slide and these photos I took of a (seemingly very accurate) Block V model at the Pearl Harbor museum:

https://i.imgur.com/7hYkuss.jpg
https://imgur.com/a/KXPnjPG

You can get a better view of the LVA here:

https://www.dvidshub.net/image/6858405/uss-south-dakota-ssn-790-change-command-ceremony

ModelMonkey,

If you used that drawing of the South Dakota above, you'd end up with a very accurate hull form. The appendages are the wrong size, but the hull and WAA faring forms are exactly correct. The position of the forward WAA arrays is a bit further forward (~6 feet) than on other Virginias to avoid interference with the LVA.

In terms of the propulsor, there is unclassified material sufficient to make a decent representation. There are a few photos on navsource that show the rotor on the nearly complete submarine draped in a tarp, and you can get an idea of the number and shape of the blades. NNS also leaves a few rotors and stators outside the building hall in tarps that can be found using google earth (you might have to use the feature of google earth to wind back time for the image date).

Jacob

Edit: And just to be clear, no classified information here ;)

_________________
Under Construction:
1/350 Typhoon
1/350 Skate
1/350 USS Nautilus
1/350 Tang
1/350 November
1/350 Hotel II
1/350 Alfa
1/350 George Washington
1/72 Type VIIC


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group