The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Wed Sep 10, 2025 4:01 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 372 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 19  Next

waterline or full hull???
waterline - Atlantic
full hull Atlantic
You may select 1 option

View results
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:47 pm
Posts: 59
On Bismarck the bridge deck wasn't planked. There are pictures with wooden gratings in the front part of the deck and the rest was steel and there's at least one picture with the entire deck covered with wooden gratings.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:15 am
Posts: 677
Location: Fremantle Western Australia
If you have a photo please show it. The wreck theres is too much damage, sediment and not too forget that half the deck isn't even there anymore.

_________________
AT
1/72 Arleigh Burke flight iia
1/72 Hobart class AWD HMAS Brisbane
http://www.shipmodels.info/mws_forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=154767
1/72 Friesland
1/75 Wasa
1/53 STS Leeuwin II
1/72 HMAS Perth 1942
1/72 Russian Corvette Steregushchy


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 3:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 12:27 pm
Posts: 305
[quote=

I actually have a slightly clearer version of this photo showing the supports for the cradle that I can put up if you like. You can also see them in the aerial photos taken of Bismarck by the bf-109 before she set out on her final voyage, but they are a little fuzzy.[/quote]
Hello Bob,

I think we would all love to see any pics you have of this almighty ship. It would appear that this new Trumpeter kit has raised people's interest in Bismarck once again.
However, I think we should carry on this debate away from Antons wonderful build thread. Could you possibly post them in the "calling all Bismarck fans" section with a title something like "catwalk debate"? It would be great to see them and I'm sure the debate will carry on.

_________________
Regards

Nigel


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 3:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:15 am
Posts: 677
Location: Fremantle Western Australia
Thanks Nigel. Yeah if there was a photo clearly showing the catwalk that would e brilliant! I've made up the cradles not the catwalks. This is a section that AOTS has missed completely. There's no detailed view of the catapult and it's mechanism let alone the catwalk. The overall plan shows it being added in 1941 but again no detail what so ever. I personally like the look of having the catwalks there... More detail! :-) but if she didn't have them or atleast a photo showing them I won't add them.

_________________
AT
1/72 Arleigh Burke flight iia
1/72 Hobart class AWD HMAS Brisbane
http://www.shipmodels.info/mws_forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=154767
1/72 Friesland
1/75 Wasa
1/53 STS Leeuwin II
1/72 HMAS Perth 1942
1/72 Russian Corvette Steregushchy


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 3:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:47 pm
Posts: 59
Perth_shipyard wrote:
If you have a photo please show it. The wreck theres is too much damage, sediment and not too forget that half the deck isn't even there anymore.


Well, there's always a problem showing pictures. I croped it very much and reduced its size. I hope you still can see the gratings. I will delete it after a while.

Image


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:31 pm
Posts: 892
Location: Flensburg, Germany
BobaFettSlave_1 wrote:
Hopefuly Olaf or Herr Nilsson will help answer this one.


Well, you will not like my answer, so I will leave this to Herr Nilsson... :heh:


Happy modelling ~ Olaf!


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:15 am
Posts: 677
Location: Fremantle Western Australia
What's your answer Olaf?

_________________
AT
1/72 Arleigh Burke flight iia
1/72 Hobart class AWD HMAS Brisbane
http://www.shipmodels.info/mws_forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=154767
1/72 Friesland
1/75 Wasa
1/53 STS Leeuwin II
1/72 HMAS Perth 1942
1/72 Russian Corvette Steregushchy


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:31 pm
Posts: 892
Location: Flensburg, Germany
Perth_shipyard wrote:
What's your answer Olaf?


Herr Nilsson was quicker in replying. His answer is my answer. And there are other photos, but his photo does the job.

Nobody will like it, but I'm afraid some wooden cratings need to get scratchbuilt...

Happy modelling ~ Olaf!


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 7:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:15 am
Posts: 677
Location: Fremantle Western Australia
I knew it was wood! Hahaha

Now from that sliver of a photo... The gratings look to be what colour??

_________________
AT
1/72 Arleigh Burke flight iia
1/72 Hobart class AWD HMAS Brisbane
http://www.shipmodels.info/mws_forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=154767
1/72 Friesland
1/75 Wasa
1/53 STS Leeuwin II
1/72 HMAS Perth 1942
1/72 Russian Corvette Steregushchy


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:15 am
Posts: 677
Location: Fremantle Western Australia
some progress on the bridge structure, conning tower and turret mast. Each section is yet to be glued down as there are still a few small items required for each.


Attachments:
bismarck_0078.JPG
bismarck_0078.JPG [ 93 KiB | Viewed 985 times ]
File comment: admirals bridge deck as per kit
bismarck_0079.JPG
bismarck_0079.JPG [ 139.04 KiB | Viewed 985 times ]
bismarck_0080.JPG
bismarck_0080.JPG [ 159.95 KiB | Viewed 985 times ]
bismarck_0081.JPG
bismarck_0081.JPG [ 134.1 KiB | Viewed 985 times ]
bismarck_0082.JPG
bismarck_0082.JPG [ 139.83 KiB | Viewed 985 times ]
File comment: after PE treatment
bismarck_0083.JPG
bismarck_0083.JPG [ 85.63 KiB | Viewed 985 times ]
File comment: bridge structure and beginning of mast turret
bismarck_0084.JPG
bismarck_0084.JPG [ 97.56 KiB | Viewed 985 times ]
File comment: how it looks together so far
bismarck_0085.JPG
bismarck_0085.JPG [ 89.39 KiB | Viewed 985 times ]

_________________
AT
1/72 Arleigh Burke flight iia
1/72 Hobart class AWD HMAS Brisbane
http://www.shipmodels.info/mws_forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=154767
1/72 Friesland
1/75 Wasa
1/53 STS Leeuwin II
1/72 HMAS Perth 1942
1/72 Russian Corvette Steregushchy
Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 12:18 pm
Posts: 2068
Location: Salt Lake City, USA
Still shocked at your rapid progress! I'm getting jealous... I'm still waiting for more PE options to hit the market.

Your bridge superstructure just looks awesome though! The detail is several orders of magnitude above what the basic kit provides and man does it show!

_________________
-Jason Channell

Current Project: 1/200 Bismarck


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 11:01 pm
Posts: 311
Location: Concrete, USA
Channell wrote:
I'm still waiting for more PE options to hit the market.


You need more "brass-bling" than Anton has been using????

Strange .... very strange ....


ps: to Anton: what is with the goofy sepia wash in the photos? :-) Has the dingo been playing with your camera?

_________________
Мощность для рабочих, которые просто пытаются построить простой судна под строгим тиранов! - В. И. Ленин

Hello from Elk & Steelhead country and Cody the Incorrigible Cat

Image


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:00 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Posts: 12345
Location: Ottawa, Canada
codythecatt wrote:
Channell wrote:
I'm still waiting for more PE options to hit the market.


You need more "brass-bling" than Anton has been using????

Strange .... very strange ....


More like waiting for a set that doesn't cost $400.

Do try to keep up before putting snarky comments, won't you? :heh:

_________________
De quoi s'agit-il?


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 12:18 pm
Posts: 2068
Location: Salt Lake City, USA
Timmy C wrote:
More like waiting for a set that doesn't cost $400.


^ this. I have a strict personal rule about not paying more for a detail set than the actual kit costs (all at once, at least!)

The KA set is very nice but too much money for the likes of me. It's great to enjoy vicariously though!

_________________
-Jason Channell

Current Project: 1/200 Bismarck


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 11:01 pm
Posts: 311
Location: Concrete, USA
Timmy C wrote:
Do try to keep up before putting snarky comments, won't you? :heh:


Where would be the fun in that? :-( sniffle,sniffle :-(

_________________
Мощность для рабочих, которые просто пытаются построить простой судна под строгим тиранов! - В. И. Ленин

Hello from Elk & Steelhead country and Cody the Incorrigible Cat

Image


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:15 am
Posts: 677
Location: Fremantle Western Australia
Thanks Jason, I promise i'm not in a race! :)

Luckily having some time off has left me with a few hours a day to spend on her. Still not enough time though!
Oh you can get the KA stuff as separate sets, decks only, armament set, mast detail set and of course the base PE set.

After building 1/72 scale warships, I'm loving this PE stuff! yes, its expensive... but this Bismarck so far hasn't come near the costs of some of my scratch build warships... I am loving this scale though, big enough I can see what I'm working on yet don't have to go overboard with the detail. I've seen some smaller scale models with so much stuff crammed in it's either over scale or simply distracts from the model. Saying that I've also seen some 1/72 models and larger with too little detail. I guess like anything you need to find a happy medium.

Oh and cody, the sepia is just the light in the room. I'm shooting in ambient light, and the light source is quite yellow so hence the light cast. I prefer to take photo's during the day as I can open up the house and let the natural light come in but with the camera just sitting there :)

_________________
AT
1/72 Arleigh Burke flight iia
1/72 Hobart class AWD HMAS Brisbane
http://www.shipmodels.info/mws_forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=154767
1/72 Friesland
1/75 Wasa
1/53 STS Leeuwin II
1/72 HMAS Perth 1942
1/72 Russian Corvette Steregushchy


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 12:18 pm
Posts: 2068
Location: Salt Lake City, USA
Perth_shipyard wrote:
Thanks Jason, I promise i'm not in a race! :)
Luckily having some time off has left me with a few hours a day to spend on her. Still not enough time though!
Oh you can get the KA stuff as separate sets, decks only, armament set, mast detail set and of course the base PE set.


On the contrary... I'm a bit relieved I'm not the first online builder to forge ahead on it anymore! I'm taking notes... especially on the errors we're finding as everyone progresses on their builds. You deserve extra kudos for being a pathfinder!

_________________
-Jason Channell

Current Project: 1/200 Bismarck


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:31 pm
Posts: 892
Location: Flensburg, Germany
Channell wrote:
On the contrary... I'm a bit relieved I'm not the first online builder to forge ahead on it anymore! I'm taking notes... especially on the errors we're finding as everyone progresses on their builds. You deserve extra kudos for being a pathfinder!


I'm glad you're taking notes of the kit's ooopsies. I envision something like we did for the Dragon 1/350 Scharney. Did this ever went online here?

@ Perth ~ It's quite challenging keeping your pace. I hope it is not to late to give notice about the slightly wrong shape of the deck housing the Admiral's bridge. This deck was not symetrical as depicted by the kit. On either side of the Admiral's bridge you have the 3m rangefinders sitting in tubs on deck extensions. The aft edge of the starboard extension was angled aft, and not hitting the superstructure at right angle as on port side. This is just a minor detail though...
I have no measurments, but good plans do show this (and bad ones and pirate copies on accident).

Happy modelling ~ Olaf!


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:45 am
Posts: 116
Location: Massachusetts - USA
Herr Nilsson wrote:
Perth_shipyard wrote:
If you have a photo please show it. The wreck theres is too much damage, sediment and not too forget that half the deck isn't even there anymore.


Well, there's always a problem showing pictures. I croped it very much and reduced its size. I hope you still can see the gratings. I will delete it after a while.

Image

lol, so I guess we were both right.

Thank you for the photo Herr Nilsson. Very very helpful and educational. So would it be appropriate to paint the deck as steel and then place the grating on top (the steel showing through the grating? Might be too small in this scale)

Olaf you got a Pm inbound about the superstructure


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 12:18 pm
Posts: 2068
Location: Salt Lake City, USA
Olaf Held wrote:
I'm glad you're taking notes of the kit's ooopsies. I envision something like we did for the Dragon 1/350 Scharney. Did this ever went online here?


I can't speak for Anton but I'm open to ideas and constructive criticism on my build... though I might decide some things are beyond my ability to improve on and/or just aren't worth fixing in the end.

But if we all collaborate we'll all end up with better builds! Lavish praises only accomplish so much, after all.

But this is Anton's build so let us know if you want us to count rivets on ya or not!

_________________
-Jason Channell

Current Project: 1/200 Bismarck


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 372 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 19  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 9 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group