The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 4:56 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 359 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 18  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 9:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 203
Location: Wellington New Zealand
Quote:
Take note that I am admitting to only ONE screwup per stage. "Master"? I wish.........


If you wish to increase your screw up rate to 20-30 screwups per stage - I have some useful techniques that I can recommend.

In this I AM A MASTER. Take heed.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2016 1:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8816
Location: New York City
Duly noted. I suppose I should try and remain open to yet even more challenging experiences. (NOT!) :smallsmile:


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2016 1:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 5:36 pm
Posts: 2160
Location: About 50 miles away from the Gulf of Mexico ( traveling W is you do so :)
Simply fantastic!! :thumbs_up_1: :thumbs_up_1: Those little bridge structures look phenomenal!




Jose :wave_1:


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 3:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8816
Location: New York City
Progress slowly grinds on. The catwalks for both ship are now complete and in place. There were the usual missteps along the way. The technique I expected to use for the trestle (pp 4-5) proved to be too fragile and time-consuming. So, I just used the kit supplied PE part as the trestle, with the catwalk glued on top. Using one ship as a test bed definitely paid dividends in terms of ease of fabrication for the second. All the catwalks gained additional auxiliary piping below the walkway, which turned out as nicely as I could have hoped for.

I’m not crazy about the kit PE, which is made of stainless steel. The forward walk rises up to match the rise of the forecastle deck; if the bend wasn’t just right (no give to the steel), then the whole walk was subject to additional stress as it was glued into position. And, the footers needed trimming, which could be problematic.

Kenyo Maru first.


Attachments:
DSCN9507sm.jpg
DSCN9507sm.jpg [ 71.84 KiB | Viewed 1368 times ]
DSCN9526sm.jpg
DSCN9526sm.jpg [ 113.62 KiB | Viewed 1368 times ]
DSCN9536sm.jpg
DSCN9536sm.jpg [ 127.28 KiB | Viewed 1368 times ]
DSCN9571sm.jpg
DSCN9571sm.jpg [ 109.93 KiB | Viewed 1368 times ]
DSCN9576sm.jpg
DSCN9576sm.jpg [ 118.62 KiB | Viewed 1368 times ]
DSCN9577sm.jpg
DSCN9577sm.jpg [ 110.76 KiB | Viewed 1368 times ]
DSCN9578sm.jpg
DSCN9578sm.jpg [ 88.49 KiB | Viewed 1368 times ]
Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 3:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8816
Location: New York City
Kyokuto Maru. I know some of these shots seem repetitive, but they are two different ships. I'm particularly happy about Kyokuto Maru's trestles in that the spacing worked out almost completely correct.


Attachments:
DSCN9585sm.jpg
DSCN9585sm.jpg [ 137.75 KiB | Viewed 1368 times ]
DSCN9599sm.jpg
DSCN9599sm.jpg [ 127.4 KiB | Viewed 1368 times ]
DSCN9600sm.jpg
DSCN9600sm.jpg [ 130.56 KiB | Viewed 1368 times ]
DSCN9602sm.jpg
DSCN9602sm.jpg [ 95.52 KiB | Viewed 1368 times ]
DSCN9604sm.jpg
DSCN9604sm.jpg [ 85.06 KiB | Viewed 1368 times ]
DSCN9606sm.jpg
DSCN9606sm.jpg [ 107.45 KiB | Viewed 1368 times ]
DSCN9607sm.jpg
DSCN9607sm.jpg [ 117.43 KiB | Viewed 1368 times ]
DSCN9610sm.jpg
DSCN9610sm.jpg [ 127.65 KiB | Viewed 1368 times ]
Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 3:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2464
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Very nice. Great progress.

Am I correct in assuming that the large pipe on the fantail is the main fueling point and these ships would pass fuel only while stationary, or by floating/dragging the hose behind them? I seem to recall from "Shattered Sword" that underway refueling was the one thing the Japanese were very deficient at, and never really sorted out during the war.

_________________
We like our history sanitized and theme-parked and self-congratulatory, not bloody and angry and unflattering. - Jonathan Yardley


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:38 am
Posts: 1381
That looks amazing. Especially given all the tweeks you have done. Seamless work.

_________________
Gabriel


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 7:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8816
Location: New York City
Thx, guys.

Quote:
Am I correct in assuming that the large pipe on the fantail is the main fueling point and these ships would pass fuel only while stationary, or by floating/dragging the hose behind them?


Not exactly. At the end of that pipe is a "Y" shaped fitting for attaching a UNREP hose. If you look at the overhead, you'll see that there are seven such end fittings. Refueling was conducted both side by side as well as fore and aft. There are photos of ships being refueled in all these positions. It is true that the hoses were floated/dragged for fore and aft refueling. Not the side by side.

Quote:
I seem to recall from "Shattered Sword" that underway refueling was the one thing the Japanese were very deficient at, and never really sorted out during the war.


There is some truth in that, but I think it a bit more nuanced. The IJN was well acquainted with UNREP; they'd been doing it since the 1920s with their Erimo and Shiretoko class oilers (USN Kanawha class tanker was their contemporary in most aspects). The IJN recognized the need for a larger and faster ship, which resulted in the Kawasaki type. These ships were owned and operated by private Japanese shipping companies until requisitioned and re-equipped with UNREP equipment by the IJN right before the war. So, it was just a matter of the learning curve, which was ramped up significantly in the months leading up to Pearl Harbor.

Most of these ships were assigned to the fleet train/supply force for UNREP throughout the war. However, the IJN did not conduct ongoing fleet operations, so many were the times that the Kawasakis anchored and acted as fuel depot ships for the fleet, or even were used in a regular tanker capacity, merely to convoy oil from oil fields to Japan.

The USN Cimarron class tanker was the US response to the same need. The difference between the USN and the IJN is that some of the Cimarron ships were dedicated from the outset as UNREP ships, so the experience reservoir for the USN was larger at the outset of the war. IIRC, the problem for the USN was that they had a very limited number of these vessels at their disposal for the first year or so, fewer than the Japanese.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:38 am
Posts: 1381
I love watching your threads not only for the build itself (which are great) but great facts get handed out as well!

_________________
Gabriel


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 8:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:16 pm
Posts: 821
Location: Wisconsin
Beautiful of course Dan!


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 9:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:53 am
Posts: 154
Location: Southern New Jersey
Amazing!


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2464
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Dan K wrote:
IIRC, the problem for the USN was that they had a very limited number of these vessels at their disposal for the first year or so, fewer than the Japanese.


Thanks, Dan, for clearing that up. I've only read "Shattered Sword" once, and that was the only book I can recall discussing Japanese refueling protocols, or any protocols at all, so my memory is a bit spotty.

For a no means concise, but definitely interesting, take on the first year of the war and the U.S. refueling issues, give Lundstrom's "Black Shoe Carrier Admiral" a look. He gives a good overview as to what the issues were, how Fletcher had to work within those limitations, and how historians like Morrison branded him as over cautious and more willing to fuel than fight because of it.

_________________
We like our history sanitized and theme-parked and self-congratulatory, not bloody and angry and unflattering. - Jonathan Yardley


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 8342
Location: New Jersey
Brilliant work, Dan. That's quite of pair of targets you've got there!

_________________
Martin

"Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." John Wayne

Ship Model Gallery


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 10:24 am
Posts: 2580
Location: Belgium
They're coming together beautifully indeed! :thumbs_up_1: :thumbs_up_1: :thumbs_up_1:
The catwalks give the ships a lot of extra delicacy and busy feeling. Stainless steel can be a pain to work with (although I like it for very thin items like railings), the PE parts certainly look good when finished, as do the different gauges of piping.
Looking forward to the last steps!

Cheers,

Marijn


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 7:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:48 pm
Posts: 2646
Location: Connecticut, USA
Looking great as always Dan! These two will certainly look unique among your fleet, that's for sure.

_________________
Enlisted men are stupid, but very cunning and deceitful and bear considerable watching." - Marine Corps Officers Manual, 1894

http://www.modelshipgallery.com/gallery ... index.html


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 8:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8816
Location: New York City
Thx, guys, that's much appreciated.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 3:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8816
Location: New York City
Just a quick update. Accommodation ladders installed from the main deck. This was more difficult than anticipated, given the need for exact placement at an angle and not much room. Plus, I used Flyhawk ladders, which are very delicate. These ships have an awful lot of accommodation ladders in total: 19 for Kyokuto Maru, 20 for Kenyo Maru.


Attachments:
DSCN9620sm.jpg
DSCN9620sm.jpg [ 190.89 KiB | Viewed 1137 times ]
DSCN9621sm.jpg
DSCN9621sm.jpg [ 197.93 KiB | Viewed 1137 times ]
DSCN9623sm.jpg
DSCN9623sm.jpg [ 143.06 KiB | Viewed 1137 times ]
DSCN9624sm.jpg
DSCN9624sm.jpg [ 197.72 KiB | Viewed 1137 times ]
Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 1:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 9:25 pm
Posts: 250
Beautiful work, Dan. Amazing attention to detail and historical accuracy in this scale. Looking forward to seeing what's next after these 2 are completed.

_________________
- Greg


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 2:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 10:24 am
Posts: 2580
Location: Belgium
Well, the up-side is that they look very delicate too! :thumbs_up_1: :thumbs_up_1: :thumbs_up_1:

What is left to be done? They must be almost finished now?

Cheers,

Marijn


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:05 am
Posts: 2261
Location: Paris France
hello Dan

really a great job, very finely executed :woo_hoo: I like it
well done Dan
cheers
Nicolas

_________________
https://ladiagonaledubosco.blogspot.fr/


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 359 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 18  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group