@ wefalck thank you for your illustrations and description
as ever your uncompromising high quality approach shows excellent results
- not sure if I could translate it into something 7 x smaller..?!
Meanwhile....
I have been busy airbrushing coats of white, rubbing down, more painting, more rubbing down, more pai.., more rub..., more p...,more r.....
for a whole 10 days (!) trying to get density into my white as well as final fairing
Attachment:
P1030283.jpg [ 1.8 MiB | Viewed 960 times ]
whilst in the meantime measuring off the mast and spar sizes off large scale plans,
then doing the maths and offering the result up to a scaled 1/700 version of the plan.
In politics... they would call it an acceptable degree of error...
( ie I don't have the tools to measure the error! )
Attachment:
P1030280.jpg [ 1.02 MiB | Viewed 960 times ]
The lower mast are tube ( with another section of Tube glued inside as a laminate )
with the tapered sections cut out of appropriate size of 1.350 scale yardarms
The yards were cut out of 1/350 and 1/700 spars of suitable diameter
The spars will be reinforced midships to form an Octagon section
I plan to use a combination of paper and decal stripe etc to keep it thin but looking angular
The lower yards in addition carried retracted stun-sail booms ( not cut yet )
this all needs more work and thought!
=========================================================================================
More bothersome and exercising of minutia in thiught ...........
has been the correct line of the underwater colour ...
-more precisely the copper plating-- which would appear as a dull light mid green
( I seek inspiration from Marjinns HMS Victory model )
viewtopic.php?f=59&t=167367&start=880#p1019524except rather less saturation ( and plate detail!) on my ship model at more than half the scale !
===========================================================
but even far more bothersome is the actual line of the waterline....?!
the only 'proper' photo of the ship in service is this ( captioned Brest 1860 )
Attachment:
11 Bretagne_daguerrotype1960Brest.jpg [ 522.97 KiB | Viewed 960 times ]
which tonally is inconclusive / unhelpful except she is down at the stern a little...
contemporary engravings... suggest a slight up-sweep at the bow of varying degrees?
Attachment:
800px-Bretagne_painting_detail.jpg [ 867.61 KiB | Viewed 960 times ]
Attachment:
fBFKXBpoD9uVDFaL.jpg [ 428.81 KiB | Viewed 960 times ]
the ( superbly huge ( approx 2,3 metres loa !) and inspiring model of Valmy( Musee de Marine)
appears to suggests otherwise
Attachment:
M58FC8~1.jpg [ 1.45 MiB | Viewed 960 times ]
The detail from another painting concurs with that ( but there is much other stuff wrong with that painting...
ergo is it a trustworthy source?
Attachment:
54001.jpg [ 496.87 KiB | Viewed 960 times ]
This photo dated 1884 --- its the " wrong kind " of Bretagne--
This is Borda renamed Bretagne as a training ship ( Borda had less sweeping sheer-line)
" My " Bretagne had been scrapped in 1880..... (!! )
but the image DOES I think ) show a slight up-sweep forward of the underwater colour ? )
Attachment:
bretag11.jpg [ 453.31 KiB | Viewed 960 times ]
I have been studying the photo images x 3 of her with no conclusive thought--other than
the same ' strake ' ( rubbing strake for boats?) appearing in all 3 images
Attachment:
1.jpg [ 1.39 MiB | Viewed 960 times ]
Attachment:
2.jpg [ 1.15 MiB | Viewed 960 times ]
Attachment:
3.jpg [ 299.3 KiB | Viewed 960 times ]
so ... what do my peers think??
best wishes
Jim Baumann