The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Tue Apr 16, 2024 12:26 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 24, 2022 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1021
This is my build of a 1/350 scale TAMIYA USS New Jersey converted into a what if post-1989 explosion reconstructed USS Iowa.
I'm trying to go for a possible 1992-1996 era timeframe. Only about 50% of the ship will be "technically believable".
The other 50% will be what if fantasy. So if something on the model doesn't make any sense, don't worry about it.
I'm just building "for fun" and my own enjoyment. :) Used Testor Acrylic Insignia Red for the bottom hull
and also Vallejo Model Air Color # 70.615 US Navy Light Ghost Gray for the upper hull side.
The Vallejo color will also be the primary gray color for a lot of the ship superstructures, guns, etc., etc.

Image

Image

Image

Image


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jan 24, 2022 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1021
More progress pics. :thumbs_up_1:

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jan 24, 2022 1:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1021
More progress.

Image

Image

Image


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jan 24, 2022 5:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:15 am
Posts: 5012
Perhaps not a real consideration in the what if world, but the longitudinal trim of the ship would be a design factor as these ships bow trim was very load dependent. In light ship mode as in current museum configuration with empty magazines the bow draft is at least 10' less. Removal of a very heavy turret, barbettes and associated magazine (and contents) would be a serious issue. It's one of the reasons most missile ship conversions proposed have all the effort concentrated midships to aft. Despite surface appearance with the broad stern, these ships actually had minimal hull volume aft to allow smooth flow to allow the large power plant to achieve good efficiency.

Anyway have fun with your project!


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jan 24, 2022 6:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1021
Fliger747 wrote:
Perhaps not a real consideration in the what if world, but the longitudinal trim of the ship would be a design factor as these ships bow trim was very load dependent. In light ship mode as in current museum configuration with empty magazines the bow draft is at least 10' less. Removal of a very heavy turret, barbettes and associated magazine (and contents) would be a serious issue. It's one of the reasons most missile ship conversions proposed have all the effort concentrated midships to aft. Despite surface appearance with the broad stern, these ships actually had minimal hull volume aft to allow smooth flow to allow the large power plant to achieve good efficiency.

Anyway have fun with your project!


Yep, I know all about trim, removing (or not removing) turrets, etc., etc.
But I'm not worried. This is a fantasy what if ship. It can be anything I want it to be.
If I wanted to, I could add a bowling alley to the aft flight deck area and nobody could do a damn thing about it. :big_grin:
My model, my choice on whatever I want it to be.

Anybody want me to add a bowling alley? :heh:


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jan 24, 2022 6:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1021
Two more pics for today.

Image

Image


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jan 25, 2022 7:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:38 am
Posts: 1381
Not only am I finding this what if entertaining, but I love the way you are captioning the pictures of the build. I wish more people would do that.

_________________
Gabriel


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jan 25, 2022 9:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2016 6:08 pm
Posts: 240
Location: Yorktown, Indiana, USA
Does anyone produce a set of weapons and fittings in 1/350, similar to the old Skywave sets in 1/700?

_________________
https://inchhighguy.wordpress.com/


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jan 25, 2022 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1021
Angeliccypher wrote:
Not only am I finding this what if entertaining, but I love the way you are captioning the pictures of the build. I wish more people would do that.


Thanks. The pictures may look "crowded" with all the text, red lines, and additional smaller pics,
but I actually find it easier to show and explain my progress this way than to show and explain things any other way.
I'm using Imgur image site. It allows a person to post the images in different sizes.
I chose the "Huge" format to make it easier for people to see everything that was going on and to read all the text.

InchHigh wrote:
Does anyone produce a set of weapons and fittings in 1/350, similar to the old Skywave sets in 1/700?


In my last pic above, you can see that I'll be using CIWS from Veteran Models.
They make a whole assortment of ship accessories in 1/350 (and other) scale for US Navy, Japanese Navy, and WWII German navy fittings.
Try searching for them on the Freetime Hobbies website.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 8:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1021
More progress pics.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2022 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 5:10 pm
Posts: 275
Location: Windsor Junction NS
Suggestion - if you switch your Harpoon Launchers so that they fire athwartships, then you don't need the blast deflectors. Have a look at how the Royal Canadian Navy have their Harpoon launchers configured on the Halifax class ships - the back end of the launcher is pointed over the side, with the missiles firing across the top of the ship, so basically a missile from the port launcher is fired at targets to Starboard and vice versa.

Just an idea for you.

NS

_________________
ICBM Address: 44:78N 063:63W

Ex RCN, HMC Ships Gatineau, Athabaskan, Charlottetown, St. John's, Montreal, Charlottetown, Summerside, Montreal.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2022 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1021
NavyShooter wrote:
Suggestion - if you switch your Harpoon Launchers so that they fire athwartships, then you don't need the blast deflectors. Have a look at how the Royal Canadian Navy have their Harpoon launchers configured on the Halifax class ships - the back end of the launcher is pointed over the side, with the missiles firing across the top of the ship, so basically a missile from the port launcher is fired at targets to Starboard and vice versa.

Just an idea for you.

NS


Yeah, I thought about having them the other way that you suggest.
I've seen them that way in pictures of Spruance class destroyers.
But for some odd reason, I just didn't like the look of them facing inward like that.
The amidships blast deflectors are already glued in place
and I'll be adding/gluing in the amidships Harpoon launchers later this week.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Feb 02, 2022 3:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1021
More progress pics.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Feb 02, 2022 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1021
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2022 6:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1021
Getting back to the below pic.........I need opinions.
I could possibly scratch build a whole new mast structure, but my eyesight isn't that good and trying to get all the styrene pieces either straight or at the correct angles won't be easy.
If I used the smaller platform that an RPV radome used to be on as shown in the upper left of the pic, I'm not sure if the platform could hold the weight of the Mk.23 TAS?
Anybody got any suggestions?


Image


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Feb 04, 2022 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:00 pm
Posts: 897
Location: Bowmanville, ON, Canada
Do you have any masts in the spares box that you could adapt?

If not, maybe add a couple of pole legs angled forward and put on a bigger platform?

_________________
Darren (Admiral Hawk)
In the not so tropical climate of the Great White North.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Feb 04, 2022 6:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1021
Admhawk wrote:
Do you have any masts in the spares box that you could adapt?

If not, maybe add a couple of pole legs angled forward and put on a bigger platform?


I've got a very old Revell New Jersey kit, and I've got a 2nd TAMIYA New Jersey kit that I can rummage for parts.
I don't want to use the Revell kit if at all possible because of the flash on so many parts, and some parts are misshapen/oversized, etc.
But........if I have to dig into either kit, then I'll have to. We'll see how things go.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Feb 05, 2022 6:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1021
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Feb 05, 2022 6:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1021
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Feb 05, 2022 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 5:30 pm
Posts: 5385
Location: Nr Southampton England
Ahoi EJM

my personal unbiased view...! :big_grin: :big_grin:
if you can strip tyhe decks -- remove the acrylic piant


dump the acrylic paint when brushing decks and use enamels for your decks

greater opacity even when thin coated, dries slower so can be worked and re-thinned if needed
and I find much less claggy when brushed than acrylics.

just a thought from confirmed enamel brush painter :cool_2: :wave_1:

GREAT works-- soooo much research and work

JB

_________________
....I buy them at three times the speed I build 'em.... will I live long enough to empty my stash...?
http://www.modelshipgallery.com/gallery ... index.html

IPMS UK SIG (special interest group) www.finewaterline.com


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group