The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 2:20 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2017 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:59 pm
Posts: 52
Location: Paris
Martocticvs wrote:
I recently worked on this area on my 3D model. As you will know, there are lots of photos showing the catapult, but some of the details are extremely hard to make out - those hyrdraulic things (I assume they are involved in the operation of the turntables, as they appear to interface with them in some way).

Here are some screenshots from my model - feel free to disregard since they are of course only my interpretation.
https://snag.gy/pEKdbQ.jpg
https://snag.gy/TMxLES.jpg
https://snag.gy/750OCT.jpg
https://snag.gy/3ZhSkq.jpg
https://snag.gy/ei32WJ.jpg

It's as accurate as I could make it. I spent way too long staring at photos for this stuff.


Nice work on your 3D model. You have posted interesting pictures with details of equipments between rails. That's what I'm looking for. Did you get pictures from archives or plans?


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2017 4:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 7:59 am
Posts: 228
It's based entirely on what I could see in photos available via the Imperial War Museum. Size reference is reverse engineered from the only real known quantity I had, which was the Walrus aircraft. I have a 80 - 85% confidence on general dimensional accuracy based on this (it's obviously not going to be spot on, but it is visually close enough). Detail accuracy I think is fairly high in certain areas, less so in others. The hydraulic things between the fore-and-aft rails are probably the least clear component of the lot. I made several sketches to try and make sense of what I could see - I can guarantee that this is not correct, but I felt it was close enough, again. The buffers are fairly accurate when it comes to the top cylinder, the lower one is much harder to make out so some guesswork was required. Smaller details such as the hydralic locking bars for the rails are pretty close to the original, as are most of the structural details.

All of this is intended to be as accurate as I could make it for KGV. DoY, Anson and Howe had some slight differences, primarily in rail supports. Can't comment on PoW since detail shots are few.

_________________
King George V class Battleships in 3D


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:05 am
Posts: 2261
Location: Paris France
HI Jeff

go ......Redo all this in scratch ....the Heller part is realy ugly
A little personal work....your KGV Is worth it
cheers
Nicolas

_________________
https://ladiagonaledubosco.blogspot.fr/


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:59 pm
Posts: 52
Location: Paris
Hi guys,

As I was not really satisfied by the Heller part provided in the kit, event if I detailed it, i have decided to scratch built a new one. It takes me time, required patience but I enjoy doing it :big_grin:

This new part might not be as exact as I would like to, but for the scale it should be more than enough. Here is a picture of the work in progress

Image

Thanks Nico for pushing me :thumbs_up_1:

Cya, Jeff


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jul 16, 2017 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 7:59 am
Posts: 228
So much better than the kit blobs already! Definitely worth the effort

_________________
King George V class Battleships in 3D


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jul 16, 2017 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:59 pm
Posts: 52
Location: Paris
A little update guys, I keep on working on the catapult system :thumbs_up_1:

Image

A lot of things to do, work is not over :big_grin:


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:59 pm
Posts: 52
Location: Paris
Work is still in progress on the catapult. I try to do my best to implement it, but for a 1/400 scale model, there is no miracle. Anyway, I hope that it will be better than the one proposed by Heller :big_grin: . Parts are not glued yet.

Image

Image

Image

Image

About the Walrus, don't worry, it will be modified too :thumbs_up_1:


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:59 pm
Posts: 52
Location: Paris
I keep on working on my catapult, but I still don't manage to have enough time to finish this model.

Anyway I worked today on rails fittings.

Image

Keep the faith :thumbs_up_1:


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:05 am
Posts: 2261
Location: Paris France
Hi Jeff

this catapult has received a great work that brings a lot to your model :thumbs_up_1: no need for PE your personal work is much finer and convincing
well done
cheers
Nicolas

_________________
https://ladiagonaledubosco.blogspot.fr/


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:59 pm
Posts: 52
Location: Paris
Hi folks,

The weather was really good here today, so I took time to work on my catapult. It is nearly finished, I'll have to add details and cables next time.

I'm sorry for the poor quality of pictures as I took them with my mobile phone :big_grin:

Image

Image

Image

Image

As you can see, this scratch built part looks a bit better than the one proposed by Heller. I hope you will enjoy it :P

You'll find hereafter the catapult placed on my KGV. The parts is not glued for the moment as I still need to work on it.

Image

Image

Image

Cya next time all :thumbs_up_1:


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Nov 12, 2017 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:59 pm
Posts: 52
Location: Paris
Hi all,

Work is still in progress on my KGV. I've spend a couple of weeks on the upgrade of the walrus as the one proposed by Heller is .... ugly :big_grin: . White Ensign Models set had some details to the walrus, but not that much. Even with PE parts it is not looking that good.

That's the reason why I decided to completely modify it and scratch built. Here we go ;-)

Image

The engine must be rebuilt, I can't let it this way...

Image

Image

I also used mastic for plastic shrinkage

Image

I drill 0.3mm hole for wings masts. Avoid shaking !

Image

Image

At this stage, this is how it looks like

Image

Image

Image

Then I worked on the underneath of the aircraft

Image

Image

Mastic is used to modify floats fitting hole on the wing as they are too large.

Image

Image

The next step took me time .... and patience. It scratch built a new engine nacelle with high technology tools :big_grin:

Image

The nacelle is made of a plasticard tube of 2.4mm. Then I added the 9 pistons of the engine

Image

The propeller IS the one proposed by WEM. It's a four-bladed model why in reality it is 2 two-bladed propellers offset by 90 degrees. From my point of view, it not a problem at this scale.

Image

I did masts for the nacelle, based on copper wires.

Image

A view of the lower wing underneath after sanding

Image

I started painting the Walrus using a set provided by Vallejo

Image

I first paint the aircraft with Insigna White color.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

After drying, I paint upper surfaces with extra dark sea grey

Image

Image

Image

So that's all for today folk's.

Cya next time :wave_1:


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Nov 12, 2017 6:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 1:58 pm
Posts: 537
Location: Idaho, United States
That is a vast improvement over the kit's Walrus. :thumbs_up_1:

_________________
Image
Si hortum in bibliotheca habes, nihil deerit.
- Consul Marcus Tullius Cicero


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 7:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 2:17 am
Posts: 283
Location: _/\/¯¯¯¯¯\/\_ Cape Town
Really nice model, love what you're doing!!


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:05 am
Posts: 2261
Location: Paris France
HI Jef

great job on this Walrus :thumbs_up_1: nothing to do with the original horror :smallsmile:
keep the way ,my friend
cheers
Nicolas

_________________
https://ladiagonaledubosco.blogspot.fr/


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Dec 17, 2017 12:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:59 pm
Posts: 52
Location: Paris
Thanks guys for your support :thumbs_up_1:

I've been working hard to improve the Walrus. You'll fin hereafter the last pictures of the aircraft.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

It still requires varnish and then I'll fit it to the catapult. I'm stressed anytime I have to manipulate it .... I guess you know why :big_grin:

I hope you will enjoy.

Cya next time.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2018 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:59 pm
Posts: 52
Location: Paris
Hi all,

First of all I wish you a happy new year and all the best for 2018 :thumbs_up_1:

I took time today to finalize my Walrus. I'm happy of it, it is much better than the original one provided by Heller. I hope you will enjoy it :wink:

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Cya next time


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2018 6:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 7:59 am
Posts: 228
Good work! They were rather tough aircraft, in spite of their fragile appearance! Although at this scale, I would imagine a mis-placed sneeze could spell disaster :D

Do you have landing gear fitted? If so, I believe it was usually set in the lowered position for launch. They did sometimes not bother to fit it at all, though.

_________________
King George V class Battleships in 3D


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:59 pm
Posts: 52
Location: Paris
I did not fit the landing gear as it is totally hidden and PE part are absolutely wrong.

When aircraft is launched, the landing gear is in up position :wink:

Image


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2017 10:48 am
Posts: 220
That's a nice model you're making there Jeff....very nice indeed..

Pete


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 7:59 am
Posts: 228
I've seen footage of one being launched gear down, and you can see it being pumped up right after take off. But as I said, they sometimes didn't even fit the gear at all, so any configuration should be accurate :)

_________________
King George V class Battleships in 3D


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 80 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group