The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 4:08 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Aug 05, 2017 9:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:57 am
Posts: 234
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia
Started on the Very Fire USS Montana. Nice looking kit!

Image

Image

She'll be on pedestals...
Image

...to better display her shapely armour belt:
Image

Quite promising so far.
Image

More to follow.

_________________
Andrew P, PBFHS
Chesapeake, Virginia
www.PBFHS.org


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 06, 2017 5:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 5:33 pm
Posts: 1772
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Very nice ship model. Best with paper designs is you have a free hand at painting it. Nothing is wrong. Enjoy the build and post updates!

_________________
- @Shipific on IG
my gallery


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 06, 2017 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:57 am
Posts: 234
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia
Hull paint: Primed (rattle can grey primer) and base coated with the primary color, then masked at the full-load waterline for the boot topping and shot with rattlecan flat black.

Image

Base colors are PS Acrylic 5-N and MM Acryl 5-H:
Image

Unmasking after painting the lower hull (MM Acryl Hull Red). Note the tape spacers I used to mark the width of the boot topping. Note that if you choose do the boot top this way, you must account for the larger width of the BT where the hull is sloping inward at the stern. (I did it by eye).
Image

The kit comes with a very nice PE set. it is not the finest I've seen, but very complete. I shot the PE with an automotive self-etching acid primer (rattlecan).
Image

Here she is after a couple days painting. Hull colors are PS Acrylic 5-N and MM Acryl 5-H:
Image

Work continues.

_________________
Andrew P, PBFHS
Chesapeake, Virginia
www.PBFHS.org


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 06, 2017 3:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 5:33 pm
Posts: 1772
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
how straight is the blue camouflage stripe? In some pics it comes off as if it is drooping down a bit than kicks up at the bow in the last few mm....

_________________
- @Shipific on IG
my gallery


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 06, 2017 4:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:01 pm
Posts: 1257
Location: Detroit area
pascalemod wrote:
how straight is the blue camouflage stripe? In some pics it comes off as if it is drooping down a bit than kicks up at the bow in the last few mm....


The "droop" in the line between the Navy Blue and Haze Gray is a part of Measure 22, but the uplift just under the stem is probably not intentional.

_________________
Sean Nash, ACG (aircraft camo gestapo)

On the ways:
1/200 Trumpeter HMS Nelson
1/700 Tamiya USS Yorktown CV-5

In the stash:
1/35 Italiari PT-109
1/35 Tamiya "Pibber" Patrol Boat
1/350 Trumpeter USS Yorktown CV-10


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 06, 2017 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 5:49 pm
Posts: 1589
Location: The beautiful PNW
Looks pretty good to me,

Matt

_________________
In the yards right now:
USS Utah AG-16
On Hold
1/350 USS Portland CA-33 1942
1/350 Trumpeter Texas with a twist


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:01 pm
Posts: 86
I just got this kit. It looks like a nice set.

_________________
The most attractive project, to me, is the one that I've just heard someone say can't be done. :)


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 14, 2017 9:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:57 am
Posts: 234
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia
pascalemod wrote:
how straight is the blue camouflage stripe? In some pics it comes off as if it is drooping down a bit than kicks up at the bow in the last few mm....

You have a keen eye! I noticed too and was trying to convince myself that no one else would notice. Fortunately, I lost that argument with myself and re-did the Haze grey above the sheer line. Here she is with a couple more shots of 5-N and 5-H, plus a gloss coat of Future as a substrate for decals. Better now (not perfect, but the opposing voices in my head are appeased):

Image

Image

The MONTANA nameplate on her bum is from the kit decals, but I found the white hull number decals too small for my liking, so I replaced them with larger numerals, and added draft marks (GMM decals from my spares box):

Image

I also drilled out the chain pipes and hawse holes and painted the chain plates black (anachronistic, but I like it)…
Image

Image

…installed the kit’s pre-cut wood deck veneer...
Image

...and closed up the hull:
Image

PE work to follow.

_________________
Andrew P, PBFHS
Chesapeake, Virginia
www.PBFHS.org


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:01 pm
Posts: 86
My kit did not come with wood deck veneer, nor is it listed among the contents

_________________
The most attractive project, to me, is the one that I've just heard someone say can't be done. :)


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 10:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:57 am
Posts: 234
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia
Spot wrote:
My kit did not come with wood deck veneer, nor is it listed among the contents
Mine did. I don't know if it was a special deal, but the wood deck was included, all the way in the bottom of the box:
Image

Oddly, and like you pointed out, the wood is not mentioned in the instructions or on the box, nor on the built-up model images on the box.

Sorry that your kit doesn't include the wood deck. It fits like a glove.
Image

FYI, I ordered my kit from Hobby Easy in HK for $59 (including shipping) on June 9 and received about July 1, just outside 3 weeks.

_________________
Andrew P, PBFHS
Chesapeake, Virginia
www.PBFHS.org


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 7:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 19, 2017 9:14 am
Posts: 47
Location: Kansas
I did not know this kit yet existed Andrew. Your build log has inspired me to want to get it. From your pictures, are the gun barrels turned aluminum?


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:01 pm
Posts: 86
I'm excited to build the kit, having been fascinated by the Montanas forever. As for the wood deck, I think I read somewhere that it was a limited run for the first kits out the door and really it isn't a huge deal for me since I've gotten pretty good at painting simulated wood decking with a base of enamel and then dry brushing with acrylics and accenting with colored pencils and standard pencils. Topped off with flat clear coat and I'm happy. :)

Depending on which paint scheme I go with the deck might end up being blue any way.

Nice work on your kit, by the way.

_________________
The most attractive project, to me, is the one that I've just heard someone say can't be done. :)


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 3:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:25 pm
Posts: 1534
Location: England
Looking very good, nice sharp build! I'll be following to see this monster finished. Actually, you've tempted me somewhat to look into getting this kit, it is a very interesting "what-if" and a huge long model to boot.

Having said that, I'm not a fan of Very Fire's choice of Iowa style bridge. I know this is a valid interpretation and since the ships were never built it can't be "wrong", but it looks weird on Montana. I prefer the pilot house above and behind the armoured conning tower (North Carolina style) which appears in several drawings, art works and the big concept model for the ship. This doesn't detract at all from the workmanship of your build, but I would be tempted to chop that area up and convert it if I were to make one myself.

_________________
Vlad


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 7:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:01 pm
Posts: 86
I think that by the time they would have been constructed, it is at least not out of the question that the ships would have used sub-assemblies for a lot of parts, as other shipbuilding was doing, so superstructures resembling the Iowa class seems appropriate since they were the other class that would have been building at the time.

_________________
The most attractive project, to me, is the one that I've just heard someone say can't be done. :)


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:25 pm
Posts: 1534
Location: England
Spot wrote:
I think that by the time they would have been constructed, it is at least not out of the question that the ships would have used sub-assemblies for a lot of parts, as other shipbuilding was doing, so superstructures resembling the Iowa class seems appropriate since they were the other class that would have been building at the time.


Yes, it's definitely plausible. But consider that the enclosed bridge on the Iowas was an after-thought added at the request of officers. If the USN was backtracking on the open bridge design intruduced with SoDak, why would a new design just copy something that was only a "quick fix" in the first place?

Sorry for the thread derail :wave_1:

_________________
Vlad


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:01 pm
Posts: 86
I might build mine with the bridge of an Essex class carrier, just to mess with people. ;)

_________________
The most attractive project, to me, is the one that I've just heard someone say can't be done. :)


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 11:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 5:36 pm
Posts: 2160
Location: About 50 miles away from the Gulf of Mexico ( traveling W is you do so :)
I'm loving this so far! :thumbs_up_1: :thumbs_up_1:




Jose :wave_1:


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2017 3:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:01 pm
Posts: 86
I do wish the planes were molded in clear plastic.

I may have to raid my stash because that's one of the better inventions in modeling

_________________
The most attractive project, to me, is the one that I've just heard someone say can't be done. :)


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 9:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:13 pm
Posts: 7
Just ordered my Very Fire Montana. I'm probably going to use the Louisiana hull numbers since that's my home state, but I prefer the Iowa style bridge so I opted for the Montana model.

Did you keep the deck natural wood? I know its probably "incorrect" (as much as a paper ship can be) but I think the natural wood looks so much more striking against that gray and blue hull.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 8:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 11:33 am
Posts: 43
Location: San Antonio, TX
Love this, looking good, any chance of an update?


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 86 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group