marijn van gils wrote:
Wonderful!
Nanond wrote:
The tide mark still needs more work. I think I rushed it too much.
Looks quite ok to me. Only the transition from the tide mark to the grey hull colour can maybe be softened a bit.
Thank you, Marijn. I tried to soften it when I weathered that part. Maybe I'll have to do it more.
Dan K wrote:
Wonderful work.
Thank you, Dan.
JIM BAUMANN wrote:
I'm learning from your sunken German battleship too.
pascalemod wrote:
Tide marks look a little too swoopy to me. But otherwise looking great!
GOing to be an awesome diorama. I will make a project like this one day, it has real life and calmness to it.
I hope this photo helps your colour conundrum, especially that brownish line. Just paint it as you see it.
I havent got the foggiest idea why is it this raw metal that weathered to this level. As far as I know a lot of footage of these is from like 1946. And some of them look like they were tinkered with, studied, salvage work has been done, they were made safer to walk on, etc. So you should ask some salvage guys really about what type of work they do to ships to understand why it looked the way it did.
I did my Haruna bow section from same time, and it also had a ton of stuff done to it, like piece of metal pipes welded into its side, etc. Certainly bizzare.
Source for pic, as you may be can buy the book:
http://aeronautic.dk/Bookreview%20Japan ... War1-2.htmThank you for your comments. I have collected what photos I could find and noticed that they were taken at several different times, with the ship's condition getting worse over time. I'm going with earlier setting where the blast bags were still in place and with lots of camouflage materials on board. The branches and trees will be challenging.
Cheers!
Nanond