Filipe Ramires wrote:
JWintjes wrote:
a) the 6in guns are a waste of weight and manpower, being not very useful in most situations, manpower intensive and poorly protected,
d) the tactical thinking behind the fitting of such a large number of torpedo tubes was dubious, to say the least and
e) for employment mainly in the North Sea an aircraft isn't really necessary
A and B) GUNS - The 5.9' guns proved nearly useless in Graf Spee against the 3 cruisers.
D) TORPS - Uselessy used by Graf Spee.
E) PLANE - I wouldn't drop off the Arado. They are always useful even in the North Sea. I've rather prefer to have one onboard rather then go out in mission and cry for one and I don't have it.
F) ....speed which they didn't have (26 knots tops). Also no need to have that huge range they had. Eventually I would sacrifice some of the range to better speed.
these ships were designed as independent raiders:
A) the 15cm guns were intended for sinking merchies, they had more range than the 88/105s but had much more ammo than the limited # of 28cm rounds.
D) the torps served 2 functions: 1} they could be used to attack a group of merchies or quickly finish off one in a hurry if help arrived 2} there were some ships (Hood, Repulse...) that could both out run & out gun them, these gave them a weapon that could be used to defend against them (& mounted aft to discourage pursuit)....{the fact that they were defective, as with US torps, didn't come into design thinking}
E) planes were for spotting independent merchies (the ocean is a big place).
and F) I believe they were 28knts - not much but significant.